Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-04-26 Council MinutesApril 26, 2005 Council Meeting Agenda Presentations: 9:45 a.m. Shawn Taylor, Ratepayer 10:00 a.m. Public Hearing - Municipal Development Plan 1:00 P.M. Linden North Project Update - Stantec 1) Meeting Called to Order 2) Adoption of Agenda 3) Approval of April 12, 2005 Regular Council Meeting minutes ......................Page 4 4) Accounts Payable .........................................................................Page 11 5) Financial Reports ........................................................................Page 14 6) Old Business a) Linden North Project Decisions ................................................Page 18 Recommendation: That Council receive the report. b) Funding Bylaws ..................................................................Page 21 Recommendation: a) That Council give first reading to Bylaw No. 1505 b) That Council approve the use of Fiscal Operating Reserve Funds to pay for the balance of the Linden North Phase 1 project and provide for a 5 year reserve repayment scheme. c) That Council give first reading to Bylaw No. 1508 c) Approach Policy # 13-15-2, #13-15-3, #13-15-4 .............................Page 28 Recommendation: That Council confirms Approach Policies #13-15-2, #13-15-3, and #13-15-4. 7. New Business a) Fee Schedules i) Development Control ..........................................Page 32 Recommendation: A) That Council replace all the existing text associated with Policy #5-1 and replace with the 2005 Development Control Fee Schedule. B) That Council repeal Policy #5-12. ii) Safety Code Permits ........................................Page 41 Recommendation: That Council approve the 2005 Fee Schedule for Safety Permits effective May 1, 2005. b) Waiving of Subdivision Fees ....................................................Page 47 Recommendation: That Council reject the request by Mr. Haller to have fees waived for his new subdivision application. c) Road Upgrade Policy .............................................................Page 48 Recommendation: a) That Council amend Policy #5-13 by changing Policy Guideline #2 as per report. b) That Council approve the attached agreement, which may be used in conjunction with Policy #5-13 d) Gilmore Redesignation .......................................................... Page 60 Recommendation: a) That Council deny the request to redesignate the subject 4 acre parcel of the NE 12-31-26 W4 from AC to CR. b) That Council withhold a third reading until the Proponent has submitted... (as per report). e) Bylaw #1507 - Municipal Development Plan ...............................Page 66 Recommendation: Council Decision f) 2005 Dust Control Program .....................................................Page 69 Recommendation: a) That Council approve offering the Dust Control Program with the $1.00 rebate per lineal foot for 200' to max 400', as per Policy for 2005. b) That Council direct Administration to select an application deadline date and proceed with advertisement of this program for 2005. g) KRWSC 2005 Construction Review .........................................Page 70 Recommendation: That Council receive this report. h) Kneehill Regional Emergency Management Agency .....................Page 71 Recommendation: That Council endorse the concept of establishing a Kneehill Regional Emergency Management Agency. i) Equity System Water Users Meeting Report .................................Page 72 Verbal Report from Reeve Woods Recommendation: That Council receive this report. j) Tax Due Date and Penalty Bylaw #1506 .....................................Page 73 Recommendation: a) That Council proceed with first and second readings at this meeting. b) That Council proceed with third reading at the May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. 8) Correspondence Report ...................................................................Page 76 9) Business Pending & Summary Report ...................................................Page 79 10) Council and Committee Reports 11) Business Arising from Council and Committee Reports 12) In Camera a) Labour b) Legal Issues i) Master Fire Agreement ii) KRWSC RFP 0 13) Adjournment 0 KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 26, 2005 REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF KNEEHILL COUNTY AT THE KNEEHILL COUNTY OFFICE, 232 MAIN STREET, THREE HILLS, ALBERTA. PRESENT: Division No. 4 PRESENT Division No. 5 Division No. 1 Division No. 2 Division No. 3 Division No. 6 Division No. 7 Murray Woods, Reeve Vern Crawford, Deputy Reeve Brian Holsworth, Councillor Carol Calhoun, Councillor Jerry Wittstock, Councillor Ken Hoppins, Councillor Ken Knievel, Councillor ADMINISTRATION PRESENT: CAO Gene Kiviaho Finance Director Lavinia Henderson Director of Operations Rob Mayhew Transportation Secretary Yvonne Evans Planner Liz Stecko 0 Acting Recording Secretary Deanna Keiver Debi Moon from the Three Hills Capital, Darwin Durnie, Representative of Kneehill Regional Water Services Commission (KRWSC), and Laurie Watt were also present. 1. Reeve Woods in the Chair: ('ALL TO ORDER Reeve Woods called the meeting to order at 8:36 A.M. 2. Adoption of Agenda: ,?GENDA Additions to the Agenda: Under New Business - 7(k) KIBA Seed Cleaning Plant Under In Camera - 12(a) Legal Issues (iii) Contract Matter (iv) Drumheller Solid Waste Association (c) Land Issue • Under Committee Reports - Kneehill Ambulance Society - Meeting with Deputy Premier, Hon. Shirley McClellan - Red Deer River - Special Areas Water Supply Project - Show Me The Money 200/05 Councillor Wittstock moved approval of the agenda, as amended. CARRIED 'MINUTES 3.Approval of the April 12, 2005 Council meeting minutes 201/05 Councillor Calhoun moved approval of the April 12, 2005 Regular Council Meeting minutes. CARRIED TAFF Mr. Kiviaho introduced Liz Stecko as the new Pl nner for Kneehill Ree T CA KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 rLNNOUNCEMENTS County, replacing Jeremy Fenton who would be leaving for a position with another municipality. He also introduced Laurie Watt who would be the new temporary Executive Secretary. 4. Accounts Payable ',COTS PAYABLE Councillor Knievel moved approval of the accounts presented V 202/05 for payment subject to review by the Finance Committee. CARRIED 5. Financial Reports FIN REPORTS Councillor Crawford moved approval of the 2005 first quarter 203/05 financial reports. CARRIED OLD BUSINESS 6. Old Business :. INDEN NORTH a) Linden North Project Decisions (report attached and ROJECT DECISIONS forming part of the minutes) Council addressed the following specific areas with respect to the Linden North Water Service Area Phase One development. Item 8 - Crossing Agreements - Mr. Mayhew advised that in order for Alberta Infrastructure to consider allowing valves to be placed on provincial highway right-of-ways, the County would have to 40 provide a letter to Alberta Infrastructure acknowledging they will be responsible for any relocation of the valves and associated costs. This would also apply to highway crossings, as they do not meet Alberta Infrastructure's guidelines. If Alberta Infrastructure does not allow the use of their right-of-ways, easements from adjacent landowners will be required. 204/05 Councillor Hoppins moved a letter be sent to Alberta Infrastructure requesting the use of provincial highway right-of-ways for the placement of valves and water line crossings. If required, Kneehill County would be responsible for any future relocation and associated costs due to highway maintenance. CARRIED Item 18 - License (operation/construction) - Mr. Mayhew reported that as part of the approvals under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, Alberta Environment requires that a notice of the application be published in the paper. The notice will be placed in the Calgary Herald and the Three Hills Capital. 1. INDEN NORTH b) Linden North Water Service Area Phase 1 Funding Bylaws HASE 1 (report attached and forming part of the minutes) 1UNDING BYLAWS Mrs. Henderson noted, further to her report, that she had been advised the total number of benefiting service connections was 116 which would change the total levy against all parcels to $696,000.00, however that if this number should change in the future, an amendment could be made to Schedule A. BYLAW #1505 Councillor Crawford moved first reading of Bylaw #1505, this being a bylaw to authorize the benefiting service connection to the 205/05 Linden North - Phase 1 Water Service Area Project as a local improvement and to impose a special local benefit assessment with respect to the local improvement. CARRIED Reeve N>vc CA KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 206/05 Councillor Wittstock moved second reading to this bylaw. CARRIED 207/05 Councillor Hoppins moved consideration for third reading be given to this bylaw at this time. NOT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Bylaw #1505 will be presented for third reading at the May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. 208/05 Councillor Hoppins moved to table the remainder of Council Agenda Item #6(b) later on the agenda for further information. CARRIED c) Approach Policy #13-15-2, #13-15-3, #13-15-4 (report attached and forming part of the minutes) APPROACH Councillor Hoppins moved that Council reconfirm Approach POLICIES Policies #13-15-2, #13-15-3, and #13-15-4. 209/05 Councillor Crawford moved to table Approach Policies #13-15-2, #13-15-3, and #13-15-4 to allow administration to amend Policy #13-15-3 Approach Standards to include gravelling and culvert • specifications. CARRIED SHAWN TAYLOR Presentation - Shawn Taylor - Plan 4127EH, Block 1, Lot 10 PL 4127EH BL 1 LT 10 Shawn Taylor, owner of the property located on Plan 4127EH, Block 1, and Lot 10, (Torrington) presented Council with a request for an easement to encroach onto Kneehill County property adjacent to his parcel. He wishes an extra 12 feet on the west end of his property to build a garage, and further landscape. An old garage presently exists, however he would like to tear it down. He also requested an additional 8 feet to the north. Mr. Taylor noted that the reasoning for the request was to enable him to line up his fence with the Post Office's fence and so that he may upgrade his electrical system at his home to the required 100 amp service. The easement would be for the use of the Kneehill County alley, however it was noted that the route that was used currently for an alley, encroached onto his property. 210/05 Councillor Hoppins moved Council refer Mr. Taylor's request to administration for recommendation at the May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. CARRIED NEW BUS 7. New Business BYLAW #1507 MDP e) Municipal Development Plan Councillor Calhoun moved the meeting recess in order to hear the 211/05 public hearing scheduled for 10:00 A.M. CARRIED Time: 10:04 A.M. Councillor Calhoun moved Council reconvene the Public Hearing 212/05 portion of the meeting being completed. CARRIED 3 Re ve KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 Time: 10:15 A.M. Councillor Calhoun moved first reading of Bylaw #1507, this 213/05 being a bylaw to establish a new Municipal Development Plan and rescind former Municipal Development Plan #1338 and Amendment #1367. 16 CARRIED 214/05 Councillor Crawford moved second reading to this bylaw. CARRIED 215/05 Councillor Crawford moved consideration for third reading be given to this bylaw at this time. NOT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Bylaw #1507 will be presented for third reading at the May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. FEE SCHEDULES 7.(a) Fee Schedules DVP CONTROL i) Development Control (report attached and forming part of the minutes) 216/05 Councillor Crawford moved that Council receive this report. CARRIED 217/05 Councillor Hoppins moved that Council approve the proposed Planning and Development Control fees with the following amendments and repeal Policy 5-12: Class 2 Development Fee - add $50.00/unit for Multi-Unit Dwellings Class 5 Development Type - delete the examples CARRIED SCC PERMITS ii) Safety Code Permits (report attached and forming part of the minutes) 218/05 Councillor Hoppins moved that Council approve the 2005 Fee Schedule for Safety Permits effective May 1, 2005. CARRIED WAIVE SUBDIV FEES (b) Waiving of Subdivision Fees (report attached.and forming part of the minutes) 219/05 Councillor Knievel moved that Council approve waiving 50% of the fees for the applicant's new subdivision request. MOTION DEFEATED 220/05 Councillor Holsworth amended the motion by moving that Council reject the request by the applicant to have fees waived for his new subdivision application. CARRIED ROAD UPGRADE (c) Road Upgrade Policy #5-13 (report attached and formin POLICY #5-13 part of the minutes) Councillor Holsworth move that Council amend Policy #5-13 by 221/05 changing Policy Guideline #2 to include the provisions outlined in administration's recommendation. CARRIED 4 Reeve CA KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 222/05 Councillor Hoppins moved that Council approve the "Development Agreement Cost Share Road Construction" to be used in conjunction with Policy #5-13. CARRIED BYLAW #1495 (d) Redesignation NE 12-31-26 W4 from A to CR (report 10 attached and forming part of the minutes) 223/05 Councillor Crawford moved second reading to Bylaw #1495, this being a bylaw to redesignate the 4.0+/- acres of the North East Quarter of Section 12, Township 31, Range 26, West of the 4th Meridian (NE 12-31-26 W4) from Agricultural "A" District to Country Residential "CR" District. CARRIED 224/05 Councillor Hoppins moved consideration for third reading be given to this bylaw at this time. NOT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Bylaw #1495 will be presented for third reading at the May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. 225/05 Councillor Crawford moved that prior to third reading of Bylaw ® #1495, the required information regarding water availability and sewer servicing be provided. CARRIED The meeting recessed from 11:50 A.M. to 1:10 P.M. with Mike Steffler (Project Engineer) and Todd Simenson (Project Manager) from Stantec Consulting being present when the meeting reconvened. Presentation - Stantec Consulting STANTEC Todd Simenson and Mike Steffler highlighted the progress of the REPORT Linden North Water Service Area Phase One. They requested direction on the following: • Purchase of land for reservoir site • Crossing agreements • Connection fee for multiple residences • Final connection fee and payment options Purchase of Land for Reservoir Site 226/05 Councillor Calhoun moved the meeting go in camera to discuss a land issue. CARRIED Time: 1:37 P.M. Remaining for the in camera portion of the meeting were Mr. Kiviaho, Mr. Simenson, Mr. Steffler, Mr. Durnie, Mr. Mayhew and Mrs. Keiver. 227/05 Councillor Holsworth moved the meeting back in session. CARRIED Time: 2:00 P.M. C Cro Connection Fee and Pa Reeve CA KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 Mr. Simenson asked whether Scott, Land & Lease could proceed with obtaining signed crossing agreements from landowners. Due to the need to continue with the project, Council considered revisiting the funding bylaws. BYLAW #1505 Councillor Hoppins moved to reconsider third reading to Bylaw 228/05 #1505, this being a bylaw to authorize the benefiting service connection to the Linden North - Phase 1 Water Service Area Project as a local improvement and to impose a special local benefits assessment with respect to the local improvement. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 229/05 Councillor Wittstock moved to consider third reading to Bylaw #1505. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 230/05 Councillor Calhoun moved third reading to this bylaw. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY CONNECTION FEE Connection Fee for Multiple Residences MULTI RESIDENCES Councillor Wittstock moved that Council approve one curb-stop 231/05 for one residence (on properties with multiple residences) and if a second residence requires water, they can share the water with the first residence unless the second residence wants to pay $6,000.00 for an additional curb-stop. Each curb-stop will be assessed a benefiting fee. CARRIED 232/05 Councillor Crawford moved Council approve that no connection can service more than one land title. CARRIED OLD BUS CONT. 6. Old Business (continued) LINDEN NORTH b) Linden North Water Service Area Phase 1 Funding Bylaws PHASE 1 (report attached and forming part of the minutes) FUNDING BYLAWS Mrs. Henderson provided Council with figures for non-residential assessment based on a tax rate of 0.0007 and residential/farmland based on a tax rate of 0.00035 on a 20 year repayment schedule. BYLAW #1508 Councillor Hoppins moved that Council approve the amount of the 233/05 special tax to be imposed in respect of a non-residential assessment be 0.0007 and the amount imposed in respect of a residential assessment and farmland assessment within the Water Service Area be 0.00035 CARRIED 234/05 Councillor Holsworth moved that Council give first reading to Bylaw #1508, this being a bylaw to provide for a special tax to raise revenue to pay associated costs of the Linden North Phase 1 Water Service Area. CARRIED 235/05 Councillor Knievel moved that Council give second reading to this bylaw. CARRIED 236/05 Councillor Calhoun moved to consider third leading to this bylaw. 6 Reeve CA KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 237/05 Councillor Hoppins moved third reading to this bylaw. CARRIED 238/05 Councillor Holsworth moved that Council approve the use of Fiscal Operating Reserve Funds to pay for the balance of the Linden North Phase 1 project and replacement of the funds be as per Bylaw #1505 and Bylaw #1508. CARRIED NEW BUS CONT. 7. New Business (continued) 05 DUST CONTROL f) 2005 Dust Control Method (report attached and forming part of these minutes) 239/05 Councillor Calhoun moved that Council approve offering the Dust Control Program with the $1.00 rebate per lineal foot for 200' to a maximum of 400', as per Policy for 2005. eAd` t ?w ?`or? kP -4 mo Councillor Crawford moved1hat Council approve the Dust Control Program with the $1.00 rebate per lineal foot to a maximum of 800' rather than the original motion of 400'. CARRIED 1/05 Councillor Hoppins moved that Council direct Administration to a4O select an application deadline date and proceed with advertisement of this program for 2005. CARRIED KRWSC 2005 CONST g) KRWSC 2005 Construction Review REVIEW Darwin Durnie and Rob Mayhew presented Council with an update on the Kneehill Regional Water Line construction to date. RD CROSSING Mr. Mayhew presented Council with a Road Crossing Agreement AGREEMENT for the KRWSC Water Transmission Lines. (65 Councillor Calhoun moved that Council approve the Road ,A41 Crossing Agreement for the KRWSC Water Transmission Lines. CARRIED USE OF KC ROW'S Mr. Durnie requested Council approval for use of Kneehill County • right-of-ways for placement of water lines adjacent to Range Road 25-4 in order to avoid damage to mature trees and wetlands. 405 Councillor Crawford moved that Council direct administration to 2-u2 prepare an agreement to address the KRWSC request to use the Kneehill County right-of-way adjacent to Range Road 25-4 for the May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. CARRIED KNEEHILL REG h) Kneehill Regional Emergency Management Agencv (retort EMER MGMT attached and forming part of these minutes) AGENCY Councillor Holsworth moved that Council endorse the concept of 1A4705 establishing a Kneehill Regional Emergency Management Agency. ,2H3 CARRIED EQUITY H2O USERS 0 7 i Equity System Water Users Meeting Report KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 MTG Reeve Woods reported that at the April 14, 2005 meeting, those attending were advised that Kneehill County was continuing their negotiations with the Town of Three Hills. 05 Councillor Wittstock moved that Council receive the report. aNH CARRIED TAX DUE DATE & j) Tax Due Date and Penalty Bylaw #1506 (report attached and PENALTY BYLAW forming part of the minutes) #1506 Councillor Crawford moved that Council give first reading to 05 Bylaw #1506, this being a bylaw to establish the due date for taxes p,s and provide for the imposition of penalties for the nonpayment of taxes. CARRIED 05 Councillor Calhoun moved that Council give second reading to 24(o this bylaw. CARRIED 05 Councillor Hoppins moved to consider third reading to this bylaw. NOT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Bylaw #1506 will be presented for third reading at the May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. k) KIBA Seed Cleaning Plant KIBA SEED Councillor Wittstock advised that the KIBA Seed Cleaning Plant CLEANING PLANT Manager was being recognized for 25 years of service. I05 Councillor Wittstock moved that Council approve Councillor ?2N8 Wittstock presenting a plaque and a Kneehill County vest to the Manager of the Seed Cleaning Plant in recognition of 25 years of service. CARRIED CORR REPORT 8. Correspondence Report (attached and forming part of the minutes) 05 Councillor Knievel moved that Council receive the a?q Correspondence Report. CARRIED 9. Business Pending & Summary Report (attached and forming part of the minutes) BUS REPORT Councillor Wittstock moved that Council receive the 05 Business Summary Report. Aso CARRIED COUNCIL REPTS 10. Council and Committee Reports KNEEHILL AMB SOC Kneehill Ambulance Society - verbal report by Reeve Woods MTG WITH HON. Meeting with Hon. Shirley McClellan - verbal report by Reeve S. MCCLELLAN Woods RED DEER RIVER Red Deer River Special Areas Water Supply Project - written SAWSP report completed by Councillor Crawford 8 Reeve t c LC,? J CAO KNEEHILL COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES April 26, 2005 COUNCIL MTG Councillor Calhoun moved that Council approve to extend the TIME EXTENSION Council Meeting to 4:30 P.M. X05 CARRIED ,51 SHOW ME THE Show Me The Money - Swalwell - verbal report by Councillor MONEY Calhoun )3/05 Councillor Holsworth moved that Council receive the Committee ;25a Reports. CARRIED BUS ARISING 11. Business Arising from Council and Committee Reports RED DEER RIVER Councillor Crawford moved that Council approve to request SAWSP further information from the Red Deer River Special Areas Water Supply Project regarding their economic modeling. 4705 CARRIED 253 12. In Camera Session Councillor Hoppins moved the meeting go in camera to discuss 5 land, legal, and labour issues. asN CARRIED Remaining for the in camera portion of the meeting was Mr. Kiviaho. Time: 4:05 P.M. IN SESSION Councillor Wittstock moved the meeting back in session. X105 CARRIED Time: 4:27 P.M. INTERMUNICIPAL Councillor Hoppins moved that Council approve the CAO proceed with intermunicipal negotiations. 705 CARRIED DRUM WASTE AGR Councillor Calhoun moved that Council approve the Drumheller 105 Waste Agreement. a577 CARRIED 258 2/05 13. Adjournment ADJOURNMENT Councillor Wittstock moved the meeting be adjourned at 4:30 P.M. CARRIED : 0 G?Gy-;k, 9 Reeve ?QAJ- ?L'cc CAO 2005 MUNICIPAL BUDGET QUARTERLY BUDGET COMPARISON JANUARY 1, 2005 - MARCH 31, 2005 REVENUES General Revenue 100 Taxes 200 Grant In Lieu 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Administrative 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Assessment 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Fire Protection 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Disaster/Ambulance • 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Radio/Bylaw Enforcement 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Bridge Inspection 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Transportation 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Water Services 100 Taxes . 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue 2005 2005 OVER 2004 2004 OVER ACTUAL ACTUAL YTD BUDGET (UNDER) yTD BUDGET (UNDER) 11,298,691 64,903 10,588,050 66,956 2,342 (355) 4,020 (0) 32,745 505,100 (124,821) 105,707 384,600 102,780 490 15,608 850 15,608 126,000 1,500 610 1,500 (700) 33,235 11,823,241 (59,663) 106,557 10,993,778 295,036 15,100 (12,127) 585 15,200 3,008 2,356 8,100 1,626 800 4,900 3,875 438 36,543 (6,000) 26,000 84 2,794 59,743 (16,501) 1,385 46,100 6,967 (25) 350 70 25 9,400 733 4,100 10,338 708 4,450 10,408 25 9,400 16,250 (920) 560 15,250 55,130 35 (965) 35 1,000 10,000 8,000 2,000 26,285 6,115 595 18,250 55,130 13,750 (13,403) 13,403 45 396,500 6,000 - 13,750 383,097 - 19,403 45 2,820 28,000 (2,400) 2,404 5,200 (3,330) 2,820 28,000 (2,400) 2,404 5,200 (3,330) (90,000) 90,000 (2,722) 90,000 - - 90,000 (90 000) 90,000 (2,722) 4,188 101,000 (17,382) 2,194 52,000 19,736 1,351 14,900 13,777 3,762 8,100 8,976 244,000 200 - 186,259 1,596,687 (1,312,695) 1,916,742 143,847 682,733 (694,278) 486,652 1,218,452 191,797 2 639 320 (2,010,378) 492,609 3,195,294 172,559 (29,697) 29,697 (0) 1,151 45,847 7,179 7,872 34,900 456 80 18,300 18,862 154 550 192 350 (60,788) 61,000 45,172 1,231 64,497 (19 272) 8,026 126,147 648 is • • Sewer Services 100 Taxes (3,500) 3,500 (0) 400 Sale of Goods & Services 2,894 10,900 (2,661) 2,846 11,900 (314) 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 29,000 2,833 6,522 900 Other Revenue 2,894 39,900 (3,328) 2,846 15,400 6,207 Garbage Services 400 Sale of Goods & Services 65 9,000 9,217 4,200 4,158 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 95,000 4,107 900 Other Revenue 135,000 65 239,000 13,324 - 4,200 4,158 FCSS Services 400 Sale of Goods & Services 1,075 725 5,452 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 62,940 (725) 1,075 725 (207) 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 314,723 (59,645) 62,385 311,943 4,916 900 Other Revenue 64,015 315,448 (54,918) 63,460 312,668 4,709 KCRP 400 Sale of Goods & Services 3,410 30,000 1,000 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 20,023 227,298 16,795 25,000 3,321 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 182,207 (85,229) 180,550 641 900 Other Revenue 100,000 23,433 212,207 242,069 17,795 205,550 3,962 Cemetery Services 400 Sale of Goods & Services 1,200 2,800 211,394 600 1,800 2,993 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue 1,200 2,800 211,394 600 1,800 2,993 Planning Services 400 Sale of Goods & Services 4,901 18,400 (22,676) 8,140 25,900 6,331 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 21,310 48,600 (1,074) 10,689 29,000 34,322 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue 26,211 67,000 (23,750) 18,829 54,900 40,653 ASB 400 Sale of Goods & Services 7,043 33,350 73,701 33,550 33,186 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 67 7,500 (7,218) 200 7,500 7,105 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 111,015 (143,776) 182,715 44,315 900 Other Revenue 89,900 20,051 22,000 15,000 7,110 241,765 (57,242) 200 245,765 99,606 Land Resale 400 Sale of Goods & Services 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 900 Other Revenue Recreation 400 Sale of Goods & Services 10,500 (10,000) 10,000 2,149 500 Other Revenue Own Sources 700 Uncond Grants fm Other Govts 800 Cond Grants fm Other Govts 8,800 (8,800) 8,800 900 Other Revenue 40,000 10,350 - 59,300 (8,450) 18,800 2,149 Fiscal Services 900 Other Revenue (627,300) 627,300 TOTAL REVENUES 357,514 15,926,706 (2,106,795) 715,330 15,980,555 698,171 ? 57 • EXPENDITURES Requisitions School Foundation Golden Hills Lodge Legislative 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 500 Supplies & Utilities ® Administrative 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments 800 Financial Services 900 Other Transactions Assessment 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Fire Protection 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Disaster/Ambulance 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purc fm Other Govts-Dispatch • 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments-KH Ambul Radio/Bylaw Enforcement 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Bridge Inspection 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Transportation 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Water Services 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments 900 Other Transactions Sewer Services 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments 800 Financial Services 1,027,126 4,108,707 (4,108,707) 1,012,479 4,108,707 0 11,250 (18,916) ' 18,916 0 1,027,126 4,119,957 (4,127,623) 1,012,479 4,127,623 0 36,482 149,000 3,034,691 29,644 148,000 (29,845) 8,593 52,500 2,958 11,688 62,700 (17,036) 50 500 1,250 500 2,637 45,124 202,000 3,038,899 41,332 211,200 (44,244) 102,905 493,070 3,846 117,039 460,250 (10,243) 49,471 297,716 14,154 57,797 258,485 (3,240) 154 2,500 1,179 123 2,500 (345) 18,905 62,025 (17,386) 12,649 57,500 4,104 246,300 (56,359) 61 71,000 22,370 (1,998) 223 30,500 (29,964) 434 30,500 (38,806) 171,659 1,132,111 (84,530) 188,101 880,235 (28,158) 20,856 115,579 649,146 20,447 75,814 23,709 6,652 28,388 (4,466) 7,123 10,400 (2,540) 16,778 17,500 18,047 8 16,500 (36,094) 877 2,000 (1,692) (7) 1,700 3 2,000 (41,000) 41,000 45,163 165,467 620,035 27,570 145,414 (14,922) 16,987 90,090 141,450 19,602 71,330 (17,916) 3,788 68,500 (106,998) 22,002 188,250 10,701 125,000 2,794 4,207 7,500 (1,000) 236 1,000 3,737 377,500 (319,300) 319,300 28,875 24,983 668,590 (283,054) 41,840 579,880 25,397 5,464 6,000 777,302 6,000 (62) 1,721 7,617 27,511 (6,886) 4,794 27,511 2,916 55,927 56,586 (113,278) 110,418 113,278 2,253 70,729 90,097 657,138 115,212 146,789 5,106 802 46,207 247,186 2,045 1,600 (16,581) 1,739 16,600 (8,617) 13,500 (523) (8,575) 806 13,500 (9,062) 2,325 61,307 222,030 2,545 30,100 (17,679) 3,331 28,150 407 6,637 26,800 (134) 44,141 210,400 (209,207) 4,319 210,400 (126,426) 820 8,000 62,092 8,000 (4,417) 48,291 246,550 (146,708) 10,955 245,200 (130,977) 338,752 1,751,900 (173,780) 331,318 1,606,750 57,446 311,806 2,896,515 (654,068) 116,807 3,571,174 (959,074) 500 (280) 13 500 326 151,433 1,839,000 (706,423) 369,096 1,715,000 369,945 681,000 (654,156) 688,800 772,381 801,991 7,168,915 (2,188,707) 817,234 7,582,224 241,024 7,174 22,792 5,598,385 5,952 21,400 2,947 30,616 1,200 23,001 60,195 1,200 22,478 11,671 55,550 (17,538) 6,147 55,550 (10,055) 170,000 (106,018) 110,000 (10,000) 49,460 249,542 5,497,830 72,294 188,150 5,370 3,829 20,248 179,213 4,843 18,800 (135) 25,000 (24,386) 25,000 (12,430) 560 55,700 (30,006) 767 30,700 (6,210) 538 4,389 100,948 125,359 5,611 74,500 (18,775) • 0 • Garbage Services 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments FCSS Services 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments KCRP 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Cemetery Services 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Planning Services 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments ASB 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 400 Special Projects 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments Land Resale 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Other Transactions 700 Transfer Payments 900 Other Transactions Recreation 100 Salaries, Wages & Benefits 200 Contracted & General Services 300 Purchases fm Other Govts 500 Supplies & Utilities 700 Transfer Payments 900 Other Transactions Fiscal Services 700 Transfer Payments TOTAL EXPENDITURES SURPLUSI(DEFICIT) 20,398 81,920 (9,515) 17,027 76,900 (10,923) 63,869 358,927 (244,914) 60,896 271,955 (6,631) (8,366) 31,800 77,586 735 38,300 (4,913) 5,319 (11,781) 15,319 255 75,901 477,966 (188,624) 78,658 402,474 (22,212) 17,611 68,287 193,128 16,278 62,553 (1,554) 437 5,025 (587) 444 5,025 (307) 50 7,500 (5,213) 62 7,400 (1,335) 59,526 234,636 (237,690) 27,781 237,690 7,905 77,625 315,448 (50,362) 44,565 312,668 4,709 34,536 142,545 233,721 34,631 138,300 (70) 13,283 57,100 (39,597) 10,018 57,350 (895) 3,767 9,850 27,813 46 9,900 426 2,712 4,501 51,586 212,207 221,937 44,695 205,550 3,962 1,917 13,340 152,449 3,274 12,700 (19) 10,000 (9,852) 10,000 1,251 419 200 (36) 200 518 2,335 23,540 142,561 3,274 22,900 1,750 15,890 61,241 (2,402) 15,459 57,135 9,374 16,962 67,400 (38,154) 11,628 86,950 225 189 18,000 219 1,857 5,000 (2,046) 500 (500) - 500 8 33,041 147,141 (40,837) 28,944 149,585 7,561 27,274 117,000 69,356 25,103 113,500 31,292 3,666 26,500 (24,777) 5,160 34,700 4,480 3,839 (143,167) (737) 143,500 8,207 154,800 29,765 3,750 80,800 14,470 49,200 (18,164) 18,350 22,000 42,985 347,500 (86,987) 33,275 390,850 72,242 38,000 - 38,000 - - 218 275 (275) 118 275 (157) 142 18,100 (9,576) 227 18,100 (1,669) 416 15,900 (10,209) 448 15,900 1,563 25,000 233,000 (139,818) 37,500 245,000 (11,758) 40,000 25,775 307,275 (159,878) 38,293 279,275 (12,021) 620,000 2,600,488 16,074,661 3,168,479 2,606,878 15,974,617 698,133 (147,855) (5,266,607) 5,938 Note: The deficit shown in the 2005 budget column is not the true number - there's some missing entries that have to be tracked down. The surplus after the February 8 meeting was supposed to be approximately $ 10,000.00. 1-7 0 Council Agenda Item #6(a) 1] 0 TO: Gene Kiviaho Reeve Woods Members of Council FROM: Rob Mayhew DATE: April 21, 2005 Issue: Required Council decisions with respect to the Linden North Service Area. Background Phase I of the Linden North Water Service Area is progressing and there a number of areas that require Council decisions. Discussion The following list highlights the scope of decisions for Council and is not intended to be all inclusive but rather directional in nature. It is important that Council continue the process in an orderly manner and focus on the key decision areas. Following is a list of items with decisions made previously and decisions to be considered at the April 26, 2005 Council Meeting (X). A copy of the Table noting the items for discussion has been attached. Financial Implications Recommendation That Council receive the report. Rob N'aYhdw Public Works Superintendent 'CJVaQu-?_C- J-? Ge Kiviaho CA 18 0 • • u cm N >C DC X ?C >C Q U C 7 U c Of N >C >C CL 0 3 v c -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O V Na Q - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - o.. m O w U. c w o V -u N? •? ? •d a> U O /^ ' N O fC ,?Oi N . U - ? p ? G y c?3 2 'Eli } o " y ay ?°' E w Qo ?' 481 Q , .. O GJ ?: ,O .b 0:. . O O O O J V1 a L -•? O .O:' U *? 7 *? U v v R. aq bA Oq a0 N b U y C c?.. N J 44 U L1 no v O U u n 0 S4 `. fly ¢: U W daa K w C p p p° o ? 2 .? C 8 ° cd o U UU UUUA P , w: W. 1 a w ;.a 05 a,cv, z - lie t- 00 Cl? ?t wC)"0 I CA • u . . . . . . . . . . 0 V C1 N • Q O V N? _ ''yC V - f Q CC v O U N . L C U G=1 00 ,. to v k O C) ra. IC) a? d ? v, n p N CLS N L1i? '?" 7 ? O p CL C C6 ?. 15 ? ¢ 10 o a a. a . P4 uaax°` 333 3 N N N " N N N N N M M M M M d1 20 40 Council Agenda Item #6 (b) E To: Gene Kiviaho Reeve Woods Members of Council From: Lavinia Henderson Date: April 22, 2005 Issue: Funding Bylaws - Linden North Water Service Area Background: Council postponed further discussion on the Funding Bylaws for the Kneehill County Regional Water Service Areas at the recommendation of Administration at the April 12, 2005 Regular Meeting, to provide for the incorporation of changes to the bylaws so the levies related only to the Linden North Phase 1 Water Service Area and non-residential properties. Discussion: The changes have been incorporated into the levy bylaws. Council consensus was to have reserve funds front the cost of the Linden North Phase 1 project. An interim borrowing bylaw is not required, but a motion should be passed to this effect. 0 Bylaw No. 1505 is for the connection fee. This draft provides for incentives for those who will have a curb stop to sign up as soon as possible. The first is for a five month period and is for $ 4,000.00. The second is for the next block of five months and is for $ 5,000.00. After March 3, 2006 there will be no reduction. From April 1, 2006 those who will be receiving a curb stop may pay the full fee up front or have the rate added to their taxes over 15 years. Any difference between the reduced fees collected and the full service price can be covered off with the $ 150,000.00 which was provided as the County's share of the project within the 2005 budget. Section 5 can be removed should Council prefer not to offer incentives for signing up as soon as possible. The correct number of service connections is required for this bylaw. Bylaw 1508 is for the annual levy for the balance of the Linden North Phase 1 Water Service Area. This will have to be passed each year until the reserve is paid back. See attached repayment schedules for 5, 10 and 20 years. The tax rates required for each repayment scheme are outlined as well. The bylaw has been worked out based on a five year repayment. Recommendation: 0 a) That Council give first reading to Bylaw No. 1505 b) That Council approve the use of Fiscal Operating Reserve Funds to pay for the balance of the Linden North Phase 1 project and provide for a 5 year reserve repayment scheme. c) That Council five first reading to Bylaw No. 1508. L mia Henderso hector, Financial Services 21 0 Calculations based on: Principal is $913,900.00 E Loan Type is Interest rate of Term is 5 Years Blended Deferred payments NA 3.556 % Payment # Payment Principal 1 $202,732.96 $170,234.68 2 $202,732.96 $176,288.22 3 $202,732.96 $182,557 03 4 $202,732.96 $189,048.76 5 $202,732.94 $195,771 31 Total interest Res/Farmland in WSA = 25,073,440 Non-Res County Wide = 460,506,220 Interest $32,498 28 $26,444.74 $20,175 93 $13,684.20 $6,961.63 $99,764.78 Tax Rate =0.00042 = $ 203,943.46 Balance $743,665 32 $567,377.10 $384,820.07 $195,771.31 $0.00 Calculations based on: Principal is $913,900.00 0 9 Loan Type is Interest rate of Term is 10 Years Blended Deferred payments NA 4.13 % Payment # Payment Principal Interest Balance 1 $113,405.97 $75,661 90 $37,744.07 $838,238.10 2 $113,405.97 $78,786.74 $34,619.23 $759,451.36 3 $113,405.97 $82,040.63 $31,365.34 $677,410.73 4 $113,405 97 $85,428.91 $27,977 06 $591,981.82 5 $113,405.97 $88,95712 $24,448.85 $503,024.70 6 $113,405 97 $92,631.05 $20,774.92 $410,393.65 7 $113,405.97 $96,456.71 $16,949.26 $313,936.94 8 $113,405.97 $100,440.37 $12,965.60 $213,496.57 9 $113,405.97 $104,588.56 $8,817.41 $108,908.01 10 $113,405.91 $108,908.01 $4,49790 $0.00 Total interest $220,159.64 Res/Farmland in WSA = 25,073,440 Tax Rate =0.00023 = $ 11,683.32 Non-Res County Wide = 460,506,220 22 Principal is $913,900 00 • CJ Loan Type is Interest rate of Term is 20 Years Blended Deferred payments NA 4 726 % Payment # Payment Principal Interest Balance 1 $71,639.67 $28,448.76 $43,190.91 $885,451.24 2 $71,639.67 $29,793.24 $41,846.43 $855,658.00 3 $71,639 67 $31,201.27 $40,438.40 $824,456 73 4 $71,639.67 $32,675.84 $38,963.83 $791,780.89 5 $71,639.67 $34,220 11 $37,419 56 $757,560.78 6 $71,639.67 $35,837 35 $35,g302 32 $721,723.43 7 $71,639.67 $37,531.02 $34,108.65 $684,192 41 8 $71,639.67 $39,304 74 $32,334.93 $644,887.67 9 $71,639.67 $41,162 28 $30,477.39 $603,725.39 10 $71,639.67 $43,107 61 $28,532.06 $560,617.78 11 $71,639.67 $45,144.87 $26,494.80 $515,472.91 12 $71,63967 $47,278.42 $24,361.25 $468,194.49 13 $71,639.67 $49,512.80 $22,126.87 $418,681.69 14 $71,639.67 $51,852.77 $19,786.90 $366,828.92 15 $71,639.67 $54,303.34 $17,336.33 $312,525.58 16 $71,639.67 $56,869.71 $14,769.96 $255,655.87 17 $71,639.67 $59,557.37 $12,082.30 $196,098.50 18 $71,639 67 $62,372 05 $9,267.62 $133,726.45 19 $71,639.67. $65,319.76 $6,31991 $68,406.69 20 $71,639.59 $68,406 69 $3,232 90 $0.00 Total interest $518,893.32 Res/Farmland in WSA = 25,073,440 Tax Rate =0.00015 = $ 72,836.95 Non-Res County Wide = 460,506,220 9 23 1] Council Agenda Item #6(c) TO: Gene Kiviaho Reeve Woods Members of Council FROM: Rob Mayhew DATE: April 21, 2005 Issue: Approach Policies # 13-15-2, # 13-15-3 and #13-15-4 Background Requests for approaches from ratepayers. Review the number of approaches allowed in other Counties. Discussion Sight distance and number of approaches are felt to be reasonable. I find no reason to change these policies. Following are four Counties that were surveyed for their Policies on the number of approaches: Paintearth - "will install one (1) approach and, if necessary, one (1) culvert per one-half mile, at no cost to the landowner. Starland - "shall provide one access approach to every property for each half mile of "developed road allowance". Stettler - "at time of road construction the County will install one (1) approach and, if necessary, one (1) culvert per one-half mile. Any request for additional approach and/or culvert installation in one-half mile may be approved at the discretion of the Public Works Supervisor or his designate." Wheatland - unlimited but are presently reviewing policies with the increase in oil activity in the area. Financial Implications None Recommendation That Council confirms County's Appoach Policies #13-15-2, # 13-15-3 and # 13-15-4. RA ay ew Public Works Superintendent G Kiviaho CAM 28 Council Agenda Item #7(a) i) To: Reeve and Members of Council From: Planning and Development Date: April 5, 2005 1.0 ISSUE As the current planning and development fee policy has some issues associated with it, and is somewhat out-of-date, planning Staff would like to present, to Council, a new fee policy for their consideration. 2.0 DISCUSSION Having compared Kneehill County's planning and development fee policy with the fee policy of at least 8 other rural municipalities, and having considered the County's current policy in light of on-going issues with the policy, changes in application processing, rising municipal costs, etc., Staff will recommend some fairly comprehensive, although positive, changes. Each major component of the planning and development fee schedule (i.e. development, subdivision and LUB amendment fees) will be addressed separately. For each component, a cross-municipal comparison will be presented first, followed by a recommendation. A summary of the recommendations will conclude the report. 2.1 Subdivision Fees MUNICIPALITY FEE Kneehill County • First parcel out of quarter = $450.00 + $300.00 endorsement. • Second or more parcel = $750.00 + $300.00 endorsement per lot. Red Deer County • $400.00 + $400.00 endorsement • Multiple parcels = $400.00 + $100.00 per lot + $400.00 endorsement + $100 00 per lot. Lacombe County • First parcel out = $500.00 + $250.00 endorsement. • Multiple parcels = $250.00 per lot + $500.00 endorsement. Mountain View • First parcel out = $500.00 + $300.00 endorsement. • Multiple parcels = $750.00 per lot + $300.00 per lot endorsement. MD of Rocky View • First parcel out = $450.00 + $275.00. • Multiple parcel = $500.00 per lot for first 4 lots. For multiple lots over 4 lots = $250.00 per parcel. • Endorsement = $275 00 per lot for first 10 lots, $175.00 per lot for • more than 10 lots. Strathcona County • First parcel out = $600.00 + $300.00 endorsement. • Multiple parcels = $600.00 for first + $150.00 per lot. Endorsement = $300.00 per lot. Parkland County • First parcel out = $100.00 + $450.00 endorsement. • Multiple parcels = $300.00 for application + $200.00 per parcel. Endorsement = $200 00 per parcel. 32 Summary • For first parcel out the average total fee (application + endorsement) is, approximately, $800.00. • For multiple lot subdivisions, the average application fee is approximately $200.00 per parcel (plus a fee for the application or first parcel). • For multiple lot subdivisions, the average endorsement fee is $200.00 per lot. Discussion Kneehill County's fee for "first parcel out" subdivisions is slightly lower than average. Kneehill County calculates fees for multiple lot subdivision applications different than most other municipalities by having a set application fee, as opposed to a fee based on the number of lots being applied for. Recommendation 1. That, for subdivision applications involving the creation of a single additional parcel, the County charge $500.00 for the application and $300.00 for the endorsement. This is an increase of $50.00 (to the application fee). 2. That, for subdivision applications involving the creation of 2 or more additional lots or parcels, the County charge $500.00 for the first lot plus $200.00 per lot, and an endorsement fee of $200.00 per lot. Example - Country Residential Subdivision consisting of 5 proposed lots. 0 Current fee $750.00 (straight application fee) + $300.00 endorsement fee per lot = $2,250.00. Proposed fee $500.00 for first lot + $200.00 for each additional lot ($500.00 + $200.00 x 4) + $200.00 endorsement fee per lot ($200.00 x 5) = $2,300.00. 33 E 2.2 Development Fees MUNICIPALITY FEE Kneehill County $2.00/$1,000.00 of value of structure (to a max. of $10,000.00) plus $20.00 for permitted uses or $40.00 for discretionary uses. Red Deer County Same method as Kneelull County Mountain View • Farm residences and farm buildings = $125.00 • CR and ancillary buildings = $300.00 • Industrial and Commercial = $2.50/$1,000.00 (min. $250.00 and max. $10,000.00) MD of Rocky View • Accessory buildings = $200.00 • SDD = $250.00 • Mobile Home = $210.00 • Home Occupation = 350.00 • Com. and Ind. = Based on square footage. • Change in use of land = $400.00 • Change in use of building = $300.00 • Golf course = (per 9 holes) = $1,400.00 • Gravel pits = $350.00 per acre for the first 10 acres and $175.00/ acre thereafter with a minimum fee of $3,500.00 Strathcona County • SDD = $100.00 • Mobile Homes = $100.00 • Additions = $80.00 + $0.50/m2 for each m2 over 185 m2. • Decks and fences = $25.00 • Home Occupation (minor) = $50.00 • • Home Occupation (major) _ $200.00 • Permitted Comm. and Ind. = $250.00 + $1.00/.m2 for each additional m2 over 500m2 • Discretionary Comm. and hid. = $500.00 + $1.00/m2 for each additional m2 over 500m2 • Resource Extraction = $600.00 • Telecommunication facilities = $250.00 • Outdoor recreation (including campgrounds and golf courses) _ $600.00 • Signs = $100.00 t Temp uses = $150.00 Parkland County • SDD = $75.00 • Variance = $100.00 • Accessory building = $75.00 • Home Occupations = $75.00 • Natural Resource Extraction = $500.00 • Signs = $100.00 • Comm. And Ind. = $200.00 + $0.05/sq. ft. to a max. of $5 000.00 Lethbridge County • • , Home Occupations = $50.00 SDD = $100.00 • Additions to dwellings = $50.00 • Accessory buildings = $50.00 • Change of use = $50.00 • Commercial building = $200.00 - $1,000 (depending on square footage • Application for variance shall be accompanied by $200.00 34 0 • • Penalty for development without permit = Double the usual fee. Leduc County • SDD = $75.00 • Ind. And Comm. and CFOs = $150.00 • Sign permits = $75.00 Wheatland County • Accessory buildings = $100.00 • AG processing and Distribution = $500.00 • Campground = $500.00 • Comm. And Ind. = $200.00 for first 2,500 sq. ft. and $0.10 for each additional sq. ft. • SDD = $200.00 • Home Occupations = $200.00 • Institutional = $500.00 • Natural Resource Extraction = $1000.00 • Tele-towers = $500.00 • Intensive AG uses = $500.00 Summary The fee amounts and method of calculation vary amongst municipalities. Discussion The current method employed by Kneehill County is to charge a base fee of $20.00 for Permitted Uses and $40.00 for Discretionary Uses plus $2.00/$1,000.00 of the value of the proposed structure. This method has at least two problems associated with it: 1. The method is susceptible to abuse, as some developers may provide a spurious value in order to pay less for the application fee. 2. The value of a proposed structure does not necessarily reflect that amount of work involved in processing an application. For instance, the same amount of time is involved for processing an application associated with a $100,000.00 home as is required for a $150,000.00 home. For commercial and industrial development, it may be more appropriate to apply a fee that is based on the size of the proposed development, as commercial and industrial developments may differ, substantially, in terms of size and potential impact on the environment and neighboring landowners. It is common, amongst the municipalities studied, to charge a fee for commercial and industrial based on the proposed square footage of the structures, while applying a set fee for all other development types. 35 0 Recommendation C F Classification Development T e Fee Class 1 Minor • Additions to buildings $75.00 Development • Dugouts • Porches • Fences • Signs • Accessory buildings • Temporary buildings • Minor Home Occupations Class 2 Residential, minor • All dwelling types $150.00 commercial and • Major Home Occupations change in land use • Change in use of land, or intensity of use, where a permit is required. • Bed and Breakfast Class 3 Institutional, • Telecommunication towers o 500 - 2,000 sq. in. Commercial • Single wind turbine = $200.00 and Industrial • Kennels • 2000 sq. in. and • Fertilizer blending plants over = $400.00 • Grain elevators • Minimum fee of • Greenhouses $200 for all • Private schools and churches Class 3 • Machinery repair and/or sales • Restaurants, service stations, hotels, retail, service Class 4 Major Commercial • Sand or gravel extraction $500.00 and Recreation • Wind farms • Golf courses • Campsites Class 5 Exceptions • Non-profit public or community No fee buildings (i.e schools and churches) • Public utility buildings • 1. $75.00 will be added to the base fee for any application that requires a variance or relaxation to the development standards (i.e. setback requirements). 2. Penalty for construction without permit shall be double the original fee. 3. Where a proposed development is not listed, the Development Officer, at his/her discretion, may categorize the development according to the most appropriate classification. At the request of the Applicant or the Development Officer, the Council, at their discretion, may adjust, or waive, a fee. 4. If more than one proposed development or building is listed on a single application, every proposed development or building listed will have a separate fee associated with it. 36 2.3 LUB Amendment Fees MUNICIPALITY FEE Kneehill County • First residential lot from a i/ section = $300.00 with a $300 00 . charge for any additional lots. • For one or two non residential lots, the fee is $750.00. • For three or more non-residential lots or for a redesignation covering 80 acres or more, the fee is $2,000.00. Red Deer County • Redistricting = $700.00 • Text amendment = $1,300.00 (both include cost of advertising) Lacombe County • Rezoning to allow for a subdivision o $1,000.00 for first lot o $300.00 per lot (for next 24 lots) o $200.00 per lot thereafter Mountain View • AG and residential (per lot) = $400.00 • Non-residential o 1 or 2 lots = $750.00 o 3 or more or 80 acres plus = $3,000.00 • Direct Control o Less than 80 acres = $3,000.00 o Over 80 acres = $5,000.00 • Text amendments = $2,000.00 (ad fees N/A) MD of Rocky View • Outside of an ASP area = $2,000.00 • Inside of an ASP area = $1,000.00 • $300.00/lot (next 44) • $200.00/lot (next 50) • $75.00/lot thereafter. Strathcona County • Fee is based on district classifications. However average redistricting fee is $1,000.00 (including ad fee) • Text amendment = $1,000.00 Parkland County • LUB amendment = $1,000.00 • Statutory plan amendment = $1,500.00 • 50% refund if the amendment application is defeated at the first reading. Lethbridge County • Land Use amendment (text amendment or redistricting), ASP, ARP $1,000 MD of Willlow Creek • LUB amendment = $1,000.00 Summary Most municipalities studied charge, as a minimum, $1,000.00 for an amendment to a LUB (the exceptions are: Red Deer County [$700.00 including ad fee], Kneehill County and Mountain ® View [$300.00-$400.00 for first parcel]). Many municipalities, including Kneehill County, charge a per lot fee if the redesignation is to allow for the subdivision of multiple new lots. Many charge a straight fee irrespective of the number of lots to be created. Discussion Kneehill County's minimum charge is $300.00, and this is much lower than the average minimum charge. It is also incongruous with the County's minimum subdivision fee, as, 37 E approximately, the same amount of time is required to process each type of application. Although, more time is, generally, required to process a multi-lot subdivision application. Many municipalities (i.e. Red Deer County) charge, in addition to a base fee, an advertising fee, and this fee differs with the amount of text included in the advertisement (i.e. in Red Deer County, applications to amend the text of a LUB costs more than a redistricting application because much more text is associated with the newspaper advertisement). As Kneehill County's adverting fee is a fixed annual amount, the amount of text in an ad does not affect advertising costs. Recommendation 1. For all redistricting applications, the fee shall be $800.00. 2. For a textual amendment or review of an ASP or LUB, the fee shall be $2000.00 (this is the same as current fee). 2.4 Miscellaneous Application Existing County Fee Average Recommended Fee Subdivision appeal o $300.00 for owner or adjacent $300.00 $300.00 landowners. ® $600.00 for others living more than 2 miles away from subject parcel Development appeal Same as above $300.00 $300.00 • RPR compliance $25.00 $75.00 $40.00 Discharge of caveats $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 Time Extension $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 File Research $50.00/hr. w/.5 hr. min. charge $50.00/hr. $50.00/hr. w/.5 hr, min. charge Summary The fees required by Kneehill County for the above noted applications are similar to the other municipalities studied. Recommendation That the fees recommended above be implemented. 0 38 E 3.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS That Council replace all of the text associated with policy 5-1 with following text: E 0 Development Permit Fees _ Classification Development Type Fee Class 1 Minor • Additions to buildings $75.00 Development o Dugouts • Porches • Fences • Signs • Accessory buildings • Temporary buildings • Minor Home Occupations) Class 2 Residential, minor o All dwelling types $150.00 commercial and • Major Home Occupations2 change in land use • Change in use of land, or intensity of use, where a permit is required. • Bed and Breakfast Class 3 Institutional, • Telecommunication towers • 500 - 2,000 sq. in. Commercial • Single wind turbine = $200.00 and Industrial o Kennels • 2000 sq. m. and o Fertilizer blending plants over = $400.00 o Grain elevators • Minimum fee of • Greenhouses $200 for all • Private schools and churches Class 3 • Machinery repair and/or sales • Restaurants, service stations, hotels, retail, service Class 4 Major Commercial • Sand or gravel extraction $500.00 and Recreation o Wind farms • Golf courses • Campsites Class 5 Exceptions • Non-profit public or community No fee buildings (i.e. schools and churches) • Public utility buildings Respecting development permit applications, please note the following: 1. $75.00 will be added to the base fee for any application that requires a variance or relaxation to the development standards (i.e. setback requirements). 2. Penalty for construction without permit shall be double the original fee. For this policy, Minor Home Occupation means a Home Occupation that does not have any customer traffic associated with it, no additional employees (beyond the landowner(s)) and takes place completely inside main dwelling, or accessory building, and has no impact on neighboring properties in terms of noise, odor, etc. (Examples include- "over-the-phone" or internet based businesses, home office, etc.) 2 For this policy, Major Home Occupation means a Home Occupation that may have customer traffic associated with it, takes place inside or outside of main residence or accessory building (including storage) and may be a source of noise, traffic or odor. (Examples include: automotive sales, mechanical repair, craft sales, etc 39 1 3. Where a proposed development is not listed, the Development Officer, at his/her discretion, may categorize the development according to the most appropriate classification. At the request of the Applicant or the Development Officer, the Council, at their discretion, may adjust, or waive, a fee. 4. If more than one proposed development or building is listed on a single application, every proposed development or building listed will have a separate fee associated with it. Subdivision Fees • For subdivision applications involving the creation of a single additional parcel, the fee is $500.00 for the application and $300 00 for the endorsement. • For subdivision applications involving the creation of 2 or more additional lots or parcels, the fee is $500.00 for the first lot plus $200.00 per lot, and an endorsement fee of $200.00 per lot. LUB/MDP Amendment Fees For all redesignation applications, the fee is $800.00 For a textual amendment or review of a MDP, ASP or LUB, the fee is $2000, 00. Miscellaneous • Development or subdivision appeal hearing = $300.00. • RPR compliance certification = $40.00. • Discharge of caveats = $50.00. ® • Time extension for subdivision endorsement period = $250.00. • File Research = $50.00/hr. w/.5 hr. min. charge. 2. That Council repeal policy 5-12 a,, ? W- L I J my Fenton P er 40 Ll Council Agenda Item #7(a) ii) To: Gene Kiviaho Reeve Woods Members of Council From: Deanna Keiver Date: April 26, 2005 • Issue: Fee Schedule for Safety Permits Background: Kneehill County's 3 year contract expired with IJD Inspection Services on January 1, 2005. The contract was renewed for another 3 years, however at that time the current fee schedule was also reviewed and adjusted slightly. As a result of the new contract fees with IJD, a revised fee policy is presented for Council's consideration, which will, in the future, be reviewed when the rest of the County's fees are reviewed. Discussion: The fee schedule is attached. Those fees in normal or italics font have had no changes and remain the same as they have the previous 3 years. (The italics are minor alterations that have been made in the last 3 years from the original fee schedule approved December 12, 2001.) The fees that are bolded are the ones that have been changed or added in the new 2005 proposal. The only disciplines that changed were the gas, plumbing, and private sewage, whereby a fee was added for permits taken out by homeowners. The inspector's reasoning for this was that more inspections and time is required on these permits. New fees were also developed for modular and move on homes, with and without basements, as these types of developments are becoming more common. No other fee schedules were investigated at this time, as there were only minor changes made. When the original fee schedule was approved in 2001, the fees were similar to other fees in other municipalities at that time. As of April 1, 2005, the Safety Code Council increased their levies. Previously these were $3.00 per gas, plumbing, electrical, and private sewage permit, and $5.00 for a building permit. They now are $4.00 or 3.5% of the permit fee, whichever is greater up to a maximum of $500.00. Recommendation: That Council approve the 2005 Fee Schedule for Safety Permits effective May 1, 2005. Deanna Keiver Corporate Services Clerk 41 • C7 Draft 2005 Fee Schedule for Safety Permits Building Permits $5.V^o V Safety Code Coutieff Fee ?yJ Single Family Dwellings Floor Area (Ft2) 0-999 1000-1249 1250-1499 1500-1749 1750-1999 2000-2249 2250-2499 2500-2749 2750-2999 3000-3499 3500-3999 Permit Fee $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1000 $1100 $1200 $1300 $1400 Additions Renovations & Basement Developments Garage /Carport (Attached or Detached) Manufactured Home/ Move-on Mobile Home Wood stoves & fireplaces Decks $0.40 per ft2 - minimum $75 $0.20 per ft2 - minimum $75 $75 $0.20 per ft2 - minimum $125 $75 $100 $ 75 Industrial & Commercial (Based on project value stated on Development Permit) $1 - $1,000,000 projected value $5.00 per $1000 of project value over $1,000,000 projected value $3.50 per $1,000 of project value Minimum Fee $150 Farm Buildings Plumbing $3.00 Safety rode Council F $3.5/$1000 of project value Minimum Fee $75 Residential (Homeowners) Single Family/Two Family (developed area) 42 E (New Construction/modular/move-on and additions) Less than 2500 sq. ft. $190 2500 to 4999 sq. ft.. $250 5000 sq. ft. and over $400 Residential (Contractors) Single Family/Two Family (developed area) (New Construction/modular/move-on and additions) Less than 2500 sq. ft. $140 2500 to 4999 sq. ft. $200 5000 sq. ft. and over $-300 $350 Mobile Homes $60 Modular/Move On Finished Basement $140 Modular/Move On Unfinished Basement $80 Minor renovations, upgrades, less than 5 fixtures $70 Accessory buildings $70 Each Service Connection $70 Multi-family and non-residential including: Commercial, Industrial, Institutional and Agricultural Base Price (1 to 5 outlets) $50 plus 6 to 20 outlets $10 each outlet 21 to 100 outlets $5 each additional outlet Additional Outlets $1 each additional outlet (note: outlet means: a plumbing fixture, a floor drain, a laundry outlet, a built-in dishwasher, a rough-in for future development) Each Service Connection $70 in addition to above 0 43 Gas $3.00 Safety Code Council . Com rcc Residential (Homeowners) Single Family/Two Family (developed area) (New Construction/modular/move-on and additions) Less than 2500 sq. ft. 2500 to 4999 sq. ft. 5000 sq. ft. and over Residential (Contractors) Single Family/Two Family (New Construction/modular/i Less than 2500 sq. ft. 2500 to 4999 sq, ft. 5000 sq. ft. and over $140 $170 $200 nobile/move-on and additions) $90 $120 $150 (based on total developed area including an attached garage that contains a gas appliance) Mobile Homes $60 Modular/Move On Finished Basement $90 Modular/Move On Unfinished Basement $90 Renovations, upgrades, accessory buildings Replacement of single appliance $70 Single appliance installation $70 • Multi-family and non-residential including: Commercial, Industrial, Institutional and Agricultural New Construction 0 to 200,000 BTU input $90 200,001 to 400,000 BTU input $125 400,001 to 1,000,000 BTU input $175 1,000,001 to 2,000,000 BTU input $240 Over 2,000,000 BTU input $240 plus $40 per additional million BTU or portion thereof Replacement of Single appliance 0 to 400,000 BTU input $70 per appliance 400,001 to 5,000,000 BTU input $110 per appliance over 5,000,000 BTU input $250 per appliance Propane and Small Gas Installations: Temporary Propane/Natural $70 Gas Heating (Including Tank Set) Gas/Propane Cylinder Refill Centers $100 Secondary Risers (gas co-ops only) $50 44 Private Sewage & Disposal $3.00 Safety Code -Coned Fee Private Sewage & Disposal Permits Contractor $150 Homeowner $200 Electrical $3.00 Safety-Code Council -cc Residential (Homeowners) Single Family/Two Family (New construction and additions-includes all developed floor area) Less than 1500 sq. ft. $175 1501 to 2500 sq. ft. $200 2501 to 5000 sq. ft. $250 over 5000 sq. ft. $300 (based on total developed area including attached garage) Mobile Homes/Modulars $80 Temporary Service $50 Minimum Fee (well connection) $80 Residential (Contractors) Single Family/Two Family (New construction and additions) Less than 1500 sq. ft. $100 1501 to 2501 sq. ft. $120 2501 to 5000 sq. ft. $150 Over 5000 sq. ft. $200 (based on total developed area including attached garage) Mobile Homes/Modulars $50 Temporary Service $50 r: 45 Multi-family and non-residential including Commercial, Industrial, Institutional and Agricultural Based on total value of materials and labour (including fixtures) Homeowners - residential or farm - Value of work less than $500 $70.00 Contractors - residential or farm - value of work less than $500 $60 $0 to $1000 $70 $1001 to $2000 $90 $2001 to $3000 $110 $3001 to $4000 $130 $4001 to $5000 $140 $5001 to $6000 $150 $6001 to $7000 $160 $7001 to $8000 $170 $8001 to $9000 $180 $9001 to $10,000 $190 $10,001 to $11,000 $200 $11,001 to $12,000 $210 $12,001 to $13,000 $220 $13,001 to $14,000 $230 $14,001 to $15,000 $240 $15,001 to $16,000 $250 $16,001 to $18,000 $260 $18,001 to $20,000 $280 $20,001 to $25,000 $290 $25,001 to $30,000 $320 $30,001 to $35,000 $350 $35,001 to $40,000 $380 $40,001 to $50,000 $410 $50,001 to $60,000 $460 $60,001 to $80,000 $510 $80,001 to $100,000 $610 $100,001 to $120,000 $710 $120,001 to $140,000 $810 $140,001 to $160,000 $910 $160,001 to $180,000 $1010 $180,001 to $200,000 $1110 over $200,000 $1110 plus $5 per $1000 of • value 46 0 Council Agenda Item #7(b) To: Reeve and Members of Council From: Planning and Development Date: April 26, 2005 Issue Elvin Haller is requesting that Council waive the fees associated with his proposed subdivision application. Background On November 24, 2004, the County MPC approved a "first parcel out" subdivision for Mr. Haller. Mr. Haller would now like to alter the configuration of the approved subdivision by reconfiguring one of the property lines of the approved acreage so that it goes around a farm building, which is located on the periphery of the acreage, thus leaving the building within the parent parcel. Mr. Haller claims that this is what his original intent was, and that the Planner misrepresented him at the MPC meeting. Discussion The approved configuration was the result of the decision of the MPC and dialog between Staff and the subdivision applicant. As verbally discussed, the Applicant agreed to the approved configuration as a second and less desired option. As agreed, although the Applicant preferred to keep one of the farm buildings with the parent parcel, he would accept a different configuration where the subject building was included with the proposed acreage. Furthermore, the Applicant had an opportunity to appeal the decision, but did not do so. Although, if submitted, the application may be similar to the original, a great deal of Staff time will be required to process the application. Recommendation: That Council reject the request by Mr. Haller to have fees waived for his new subdivision application. Submitted by: Je y Fenton, Pl ing and Development 47 0 Road Upgrade Policy Council Agenda Item #7(c) To: Reeve and Members of Council From: Planning and Development Date: April 26, 2005 Issue Additions to County "Road Upgrade Policy" - Policy #5-13 (policy is attached). Background Staff have drafted a contractual agreement, which outlines the terms and conditions associated with the upgrading of a County road allowance by a private developer. The County's legal consultants have reviewed the draft agreement and have offered some additions and changes. These provisions recommended by the legal consultant are not reflected in the current policy. Therefore, Staff suggest that Council consider adding the following changes to Policy #5-13. Attached, is a copy of a draft agreement, as recommended by Staff. Staff suggest that Council consider accepting this agreement as a template, which may be used to address similar situations. Discussion As liability issues may result from a situation where a private developer, or his employees, injure themselves while working on a County road allowance, the County's legal consultant suggests that the County add, to the contractual agreement, the following: 1. An indemnifier or "save harmless" clause. 2. An obligation of the developer to obtain a policy of liability insurance, with coverage in an amount of not less than $2,000,000.00, and naming the County as the insured party. • 3. A provision stating that the Developer shall comply with all requirements of the Workers' Compensation Act. Recommendation: That Council amend policy #5-13 by changing Policy Guideline #2 to the following: At the time of subdivision or development approval, whichever comes first, the Developer will enter into a Development Agreement whereby a caveat will be attached to the title outlining the Developer's and County's responsibility of the upgrade of the road. The agreement will include the following provisions: • An indemnifier or "save harmless" clause. • An obligation of the developer to obtain a policy of liability insurance, with coverage in an amount of not less than $2,000,000.00, and naming the County as the insured party. • A provision stating that the Developer shall comply with all requirements of the Workers' Compensation Act. Prior to subdivision or development approval, Council approval will be required for the upgrade • of the road. 2. That Council approve the attached agreement, which may be used in conjunction with Policy #5-13. Je e y Fenton, Planner 48 • Policy # 5-13 Development of Undeveloped Road Allowance Department: DEVELOPMENT CONTROL Amendment Dates: Motion #385/03(Aug 19/03) Motion #47/04 (Feb 10/04) Reference: Approval Date: July 22, 2003 Replaces: • PURPOSE To establish a policy with respect to development on undeveloped road allowances POLICY STATEMENT Provide Administration with guidelines relating to the upgrading of undeveloped road allowances for those dirt road allowances associated with new subdivisions and developments. - POLICY GUIDELINES 1. Undeveloped Site - Future Residential, Confined Feeding Operation, Industrial, or Commercial Development 1) The County will pay fifty percent (50%) of the costs, to a maximum of $15,000.00, including gravel and seeding costs, for the building of the road to County standards ( as per Schedule A - Major Local Road Standard) 2) At time of subdivision or development approval, whichever comes first, the • Developer will enter into a development agreement whereby a caveat will be attached to the title, outlining the Developer's and County's responsibility of the upgrade of the road. Prior to subdivision or development approval, Council approval will be required for the upgrade of the road. 3) The Developer will be responsible for hiring a contractor for completion of the J ob 4) County standards will apply for seeding of the roadside upon completion of construction, in accordance with Policy #13-25, Seeding Roadsides. 5) Upon completion of the construction, inspection will be required by the Public Works Department, and any deficiencies noted will require correction. Final inspection will be completed one (1) year following corrections of any defects or deficiencies and a Final Acceptance Certificate will be issued. The County's portion of the cost will be paid to the developer upon issuance of the Final Acceptance Certificate. 6) Maintenance of the road will be the responsibility of the County once a Final Acceptance Certificate has been issued. 7) An individual or individuals shall have no claim for refund of the cost share if at any future date, the use of the road develops to the extent that it may be • considered to be in the interests of the general public. Related Documents: Cost Share Road Construction Development Agreement Caveat Affidavit in Support of Caveat Affidavit of Execution Schedule "A" Minimum Roadway Guidelines/Regulations Schedule "B" Final Acceptance Certificate 49 E jenet Co nty DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Cost Share Road Construction This Agreement entered into this day of , 2005 BETWEEN: Kneehill County A Municipal Corporation in the Province of Alberta • (hereinafter referred to as the "County") OF THE FIRST PART -AND- Robert J. Guedo Of: 24020-112 Ave., NW Calgary, AB T3R 1A6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Developer") OF THE SECOND PART 0 WHEREAS, the Developer holds fee simple title to property legally described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION MERIDIAN 4 RANGE 21 TOWNSHIP 28 I SECTION 35 QUARTER NORTH EAST 46 CONTAINING 64.7 HECTARES (160 ACRES) MORE OR LESS EXCEPTING THEREOUT: PLAN NUMBER HECTARES (ACRES) MORE OR LESS ROAD 7137BM 0.741 1.83 SUBDIVISION 0112341 8.094 20.00 EXCEPTING THEREOUT ALL MINES AND MINERALS AND THE RIGHT TO WORK THE SAME (hereinafter referred to as the "Lands") AND WHEREAS, the Developer submitted, to the County, development permit application # 2647-05 (application to develop single detached dwelling - hereinafter referred to as the "Development"- on the Lands). AND WHEREAS, because a portion of County Range Road 21-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Road"), which provides access to the Development and the Lands, has a surface quality consisting of dirt, County Policy 5-13 (attached as Appendix A with this Agreement) applies to the Developer and the Development. AND WHEREAS, on January 25, 2005, the Kneehill County Council authorized, by way of County Resolution #38/05, the following: 1. The Road be Upgraded from the intersection of Township Road 29-0 and Range Road 21-1 southward for a distance of approximately .6 kilometers. (That is, from the aforementioned intersection to the approach (driveway access) of the Lands.) 2. A variance of policy 5-13 by approving an upgrade of the Road from the "Local Major" standards to the "Local Minor" standards. 3. A financial contribution, by the County, of $2,437.00 towards the Upgrade of the Road in accordance with the terms outlined in County Policy 5-13. 4. All other costs of Upgrading the Road to be paid by the Developer. 2 0 AND WHEREAS, the Developer shall, at its own expense, and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, construct the Road Upgrade as set forth herein. AND WHEREAS, the County, having obtained Council approval to Upgrade the Road, conditionally approved Development Permit # 2647-05 on April 6, 2005 with the proviso that the i Developer enter into an agreement with the County regarding the Upgrade of the Road. NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE TERMS AND COVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED, AND THE OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, THE PARTIES MUTUALLY COVENANT AND AGREE, THE ONE WITH THE OTHER, AS FOLLOWS: 1. In this Agreement: 1.1. "Agreement" shall mean this Agreement; 1.2. "Council" means the Kneehill County Council. 1.3. "Development" shall mean the development(s) that are the subject of County • Development Permit #2647-05. 1.4. "Guarantee Period", with respect to the Road Upgrade and seeding required to be done by the Develop, shall mean a period of one (1) year from the date on which the County notifies the Developer in writing that the County has accepted the Road as constructed by the Developer. 1.5. "Road" shall mean, specifically, that portion of Range Road 21-1 from the intersection of Township Road 29-0 and Range Road 21-1 and southward for a distance of approximately .6 kilometers. (That is, from the aforementioned intersection to the approach (driveway access) of the Lands.) 1.6. "Upgrade" means the task of transforming the Road from a surface consisting of dirt to that of a gravel blade grade, which conforms with County "Minor Local Road" standards. 2. The Developer shall be responsible for the construction of the Road Upgrade and shall use a competent contractor to carry out the Upgrade of the Road. • 3. The Road shall be Upgrade according to County "Minor Local Road" standards. (Description of "Minor Local Road" standards is attached as Appendix B). 4. Once the Road Upgrade is commenced, it shall be completed in a diligent manner and shall be completed within one year of the date of this Agreement. 3 11 5. Upon completion of the Road Upgrade, the Developer shall be responsible for the seeding of the roadside in accordance with County Policy 13-25. (County Policy 13-25 is attached as Appendix C.) 6. When the Developer determines that the Road Upgrade has been completed, the Developer shall notify the County of completion. The County will then inspect the Upgrade and will promptly notify the Developer of any deficiencies that require correction. The County, upon being satisfied that any deficiencies have been corrected, shall notify the Developer in writing that the Guarantee Period has commenced. Final inspection, by the County, will be completed at the end of one (1) year following the date that the County notifies the Developer that the Guarantee period has commenced. After the completion of the Guarantee Period, and after the County has determined that the Upgrade is acceptable, the County will issue a "Final Acceptance Certificate" and will pay the Developer $2,437.00. 7. Following the issuance of the Final Acceptance Certificate, maintenance of the Road will be the responsibility of the County. 8. The Developer shall indemnify and save harmless the County from any and all losses, expenses, costs, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, claims, and demands resulting from any negligent act or omission by the developer or his employees or agents including his contractors or suppliers in pursuance, or purported pursuance, of this Agreement. This indemnity shall be a continuing obligation of the Developer and shall not cease upon the expiration of the Developer's other obligations under this Agreement. 9. The Developer will obtain a policy of liability insurance, to be approved by the County Development Officer, and will deliver a certified copy of same to the County with coverage in an amount of not less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) and naming the County as the insured party. This policy will remain in place for the duration of the construction phase and guarantee period. 10. In the event of a default by the Developer, and in the event that the County undertakes any work to complete the road upgrade on behalf of the Developer as the result of the developers default, then, and in that event, the Developer agrees to pay all the actual engineering costs, and other direct costs, that may be incurred by the County in that regard within thirty (30) days of being invoiced for the same. 11. The Developer shall comply with all requirements of the Workers' Compensation Act, RSA 2000 c.W-15. • 12. Notwithstanding any approval of the County, the Developer has the sole responsibility for and remains responsible for the design and construction of the Road Upgrade, in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, and for the purposes of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, RSA 2000, c. 0-2, is the prime contractor of the work to carry out the Upgrade. 13. Relating to the Upgrade of the Road, the County shall not refund any money, or provide compensation in anyway, for any reason, and the Developer shall not seek any compensation, for any reason, from the County. 4 • 14. In the event of default by the Developer under this Agreement or the development permit for the development, the County shall be entitled to issue a Stop Order requiring all work or use of the Development to cease until the default is rectified. 15. Whenever under the provisions of this Agreement any notice, demand or request is required to be given by either party to the other, such notice, demand or request may be given by delivery by and to, or by registered mail to, the respective addresses of the parties being: Kneehill County 232 Main Street, PO Box 400, Three Hills, Alberta TOM 2A0 -and - Robert Guedo 24020-112 Ave., NW, Calgary, AB T3R 1A6 16. Any notice, demand or request mailed by prepaid registered mail shall be deemed to have been received five (5) business days after the posting thereof. 17. This Agreement shall ensure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the County, its successors and assigns and upon the Developer, his heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. In this Agreement, the singular and body corporate shall be deemed to include the masculine and feminine and plural where the context so requires. CJ 5 LJ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto affixed their names and seals at the Town of Three Hills, in the Province of Alberta, on the date first above written. 6 KNEEHILL COUNTY, (SEAL) Per: 0 Witness is SCHEDULE OF APPENDICES A. Kneehill County Policy 5-13. B. Description of "Minor Local Road" standards. C. Kneehill County Policy 13-25 OF THE SECOND PART 6 Per: Murray Woods, Reeve Gene Kiviaho, Chief Administrative Officer OF THE FIRST PART Robert Guedo 0 APPENDIX A Kneehill County Policy 5-13. Department: DEVELOPMENT CONTROL Approval Date: July 22, 2003 Amendment Dates: August 19, 2003 Replaces: Reference: Motion #385/03 PURPOSE To establish a policy with respect to development on undeveloped road allowances POLICY STATEMENT Provide Administration with guidelines relating to the upgrading of undeveloped road allowances for those dirt road allowances associated with new subdivisions and developments. POLICY GUIDELINES 0 1. Undeveloped Site - Future Residential, Confined Feeding Operation, Industrial, or Commercial Development 1) The County will pay fifty percent (50%) of the costs, to a maximum of $15,000.00, including gravel and seeding costs, for the building of the road to County standards (as per Schedule A - Major Local Road Standard) 2) At time of subdivision or development approval, whichever comes first, the Developer will enter into a development agreement whereby a caveat will be attached to the title, outlining the Developer's and County's responsibility of the upgrade of the road. Prior to subdivision or development approval, Council approval will be required for the upgrade of the road. 3) The Developer will be responsible for hiring a contractor for completion of the job 4) County standards will apply for seeding of the roadside upon completion of construction, in accordance with Policy #13-25, Seeding Roadsides. 5) Upon completion of the construction, inspection will be required by the Public Works Department, and any deficiencies noted will require correction. Final inspection will be completed one (1) year following corrections of any defects or deficiencies and a Final Acceptance Certificate will be issued. The County's portion of the cost will be paid to the developer upon issuance of the Final Acceptance Certificate. 6) Maintenance of the road will be the responsibility of the County once a Final Acceptance Certificate has been issued. 7 0 rl APPENDIX B SCHEDULE A -. MINOR LOCAL ROAD >?Cn?ehill ?nty ?co0 MINOR LOCAL ROAD (GRAVEL) I I ? or 9 DESIGN SPEED yD KM/H FINISHED WIDTH = 7.3 UNDERCUT = NO SPECIFICATION SIDESLOPE (S.S.) 3:1 DITCH DEPTH (D)= NO SPECIFICATION DITCH WIDTH (D.W.)NO SPECIFICATION DITCH DROP (D.0:) NO SPECIFICATION BACKSLOPE (B.S.d 3:1 NOTE* ALL 0II 190 FIBRES MESS DTs I S • SERVICEES FIGURE 6 EXHOD. STANDARD CROSS-SEC i 100213EZ00z 11 25 TYPE FIVE - BLADE C O"1 R(iDEE3 8 0 APPENDIX C Kneehill County Policy 13-25. POLICY # 13-25 SEEDING ROADSIDES Department: Transportation Amendment Dates: August 19, 2003 Reference: Motion # 385/03 Policy Statement To provide the required specifications for seeding roadsides once any form of road construction has been completed including blade grades, borrow pits, and back sloping Policy Guidelines Approval Date: April 25, 2002 by Policy Review Committee Replaces: Existing Policy #13-25 1. Only a certified mixture of Crested Wheat and Creeping Red Fescue accompanied by a • Certificate of Analysis will be used. It is recommended that fall rye also be planted to establish an early root system to secure the shoulders of the road. 2. Seed is to be sowed at a minimum rate of twenty-five (25) pounds to the acre on County Road Allowances. 3. Weed control and any reseeding (should it be necessary) along a disturbed roadside will remain the responsibility of the party who was initially responsible for seeding of the roadside, until grass is established. 4. Should a ratepayer require a different type of grass seed mixture for seeding any borrow pit areas, the information must be provided by the ratepayer on the borrow pit back sloping agreement, prior to County approval. Failing provision of such information, the roadside mixture will be used. 5. The County is responsible for seeding the ditch area following road construction undertaken by the County. 6. Private Companies Contracted by Kneehill County a) Should the County tender road construction and the contractor wishes the County to complete the work, the private company will be charged on a cost that will be determined by the Agricultural Fieldman on an individual basis. b) Should the private company do the seeding themselves, they are responsible for seeding as per the specifications outlined in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3. 7. Ratepayer/Developer Request for Road Construction a) The ratepayer or developer will be responsible for seeding as per the specifications outlined in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3. b) Seeding will be done by the County at the request of a ratepayer or developer upon availability of staff and equipment and at a cost determined by the Agricultural Fieldman. 9 9 AFFIDAVIT OF EXECUTION CANADA ) PROVINCE OF ALBERTA ) 46 TO WIT: I, 0 of the of in the Province of Alberta, make oath and say: 1. That I was personally present and did see Robert Guedo named in the within instrument, who is personally known to me to be the person named therein, duly sign and execute the same for the purposes named therein. 2. That the same was executed at subscribing witness thereto. 3. That I know the said Robert Guedo and he/she is in my belief of the full age of eighteen years. SWORN - before me at the ) in the Province ) of Alberta, this day ) of A.D. 2005. ) A Commissioner for Oaths in and for the Province of Alberta My Commission expires 10 in the Province of Alberta, and that I am Council Agenda Item #7(d) To: Reeve Woods Members of Council From: Planning and Development Date: April 26, 2005 W, do I. Background On October 12, 2004, Council gave first reading to a proposed bylaw amendment to redesignate 4 acres of the NE quarter of section 12, 31, 26, W4, from the Agricultural district to Country Residential (CR). The purpose of the redesignation is to allow for the creation of a new parcel and a single detached dwelling, which is to be serviced by an on-site water well and septic field system. As the proposed dwelling site is in the same quarter as the Hamlet of Sunnyslope, where there are many existing water wells and sewage field systems, it was the recommendation of Staff that Council withhold making a decision until the Proponent provided the following information: 1. Proof that there is adequate groundwater supply. (The Province of Alberta defines adequate groundwater supply as the ability of a well to .provide a long-term supply of 1,250 cubic meters of water per year without depriving other existing users from obtaining that same amount.) 0 2. Proof that the soil conditions and topography of the site are suitable for an on-site sewage field system. The aforementioned requirements stem from both the LUB and the MDP. It is stated within section 4.2.1 (f) of the MDP that, for CR lots, "there is an adequate supply of potable water on the site, and soil and water table conditions on each lot are satisfactory for private servicing". Council tabled the issue, and requested that the Proponent submit proof that the subject property is capable of supporting a long-term supply of potable water, as well as a septic field system. II. Discussion The Proponent has provided new information relating to water and sewer servicing. Regarding the water issue, it appears that the Proponent did their own research. Information was submitted to Staff relating to water yields of adjacent wells, as well as water quality, as determined by the University of Calgary Centre for Toxicology. The Proponent concludes that there is adequate groundwater supply. Regarding the sewer issue, the Proponent submitted a letter from a private excavating contractor. In that letter, the contractor indicated that the site is suitable for an on-site septic field system. However, contrary to the direction provided by Planning Staff, the Proponent has not provided any information supplied by, or supported by, a professional qualified engineer. In the document Draft Environmental Guidelines for the Subdivision of Land, by AB 60 0 Environment, it is recommended that proof of a site's suitability for on-site water and sewer should be supplied by a standing member of the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologist and Geophysicist of Alberta (APEGGA). Staff suggest that this is important in order to ensure that all information is reliable in terms of quality of information and veracity, whereas information from the Proponent, or private contractor, may be biased. Staff would also like to note that the Province, in conjunction with the AAMDC, recently provided a new document relating to on-site sewage systems and the types ® of studies municipalities should expect when considering applications involving proposed on-site systems. According to that document, when a municipality is considering a development or subdivision where a proposed on-site sewage system is to be used, and there are already more than 4 parcels on the same quarter, the municipality should expect a detailed report, which includes a soil test, but not necessarily a percolation test. (Excerpt form the aforementioned document is attached.) III. Recommendation That Council deny the request to redesignate the subject 4 acre parcel of the NE quarter of section 12, 31, 26, W4, from the Agricultural district to Country Residential (CR). Or, That Council withhold a third reading until the Proponent has submitted proof from a qualified engineer (member of APEGGA) that the proposed site is suitable in terms of long-term on-site water supply, and has appropriate soil conditions for an on-site septic field system. Any report relating to a proposed on-site sewage field system must follow the "Level 2 Assessment" requirements, as outlined in the document: Model Process Reference Document To Guide Municipal Consideration of Subdivisions and Development Using Private Sewage Systems. (AB Municipal Affairs and AAMDC - 2004). Regarding water supply, proof may be in the form of either a "desk top study", which uses existing well data, or a test well. Submitted by: l_uCJ?J FC-yk Je e y Fenton 0 61 LI • 9 B. LEVEL 2 ASSESSMENT This level of assessment is for a subdivision where one additional parcel is created and where parcel size is relatively small and/or density exceeds 4 parcels within the surrounding 160 acres. Example: a 10-acre parcel is divided into two 5-acre parcels. Variations (requiring a higher level of assessment) to a Level Three Assessment for this type of development should be applied where: There is no available reserve area to replace a failed system; The parcel is in a sensitive area due to surface water source or unconfined aquifers, or; ¦ The proposed use is expected to generate more than 1250 gallons (5.68 cubic metres) of sewage per day ¦ The initial report or available information suggests difficult site soil or hydrogeological conditions LEVEL TWO ASSESSMENT Evaluation Information required in the report Interpretations, conclusion or component recommendations to be included in the report. 1. Site ? On the subdivision plan, develop a ? Make comment on ability of drawing of drawing/sketch showing: proposed system(s) to be proposed ? location of springs, dugouts or wells sited and any existing subdivision accessing groundwater under direct system(s) on property to parcels, influence (GWUDI) providing water maintain required clearance for domestic purposes within 500 feet distances. Indicate if these (150 m.) of proposed subdivision, required distances cause ? location of proposed system(s) and any limitations in developing existing system(s), property: ? location of test pit(s) and/or bore hole(s) ? location of optional percolation test hole(s), and ? provide measurements to pertinent features that require separation distances. For example: property lines, wells or proposed wells within 200 ft. (60 m.) of proposed system(s), surface water within 500 ft. (150 m.) (describe type of surface water body), buildings or proposed building sites, right of ways or other encumbrances that affect system siting location and size of the PSTS reserve area(s)(if any). Page 30 ? List the clearance distances required for the proposed system(s) and any existing system(s). ? List system types excluded because of inadequate land space. 0 LEVEL TWO ASSESSMENT • Evaluation component 2. Density 3. Set out type of on- site system(s) proposed 4. Assess soil conditions 5. Assess topography and surface drainage 6. Classify parcel suitability for onsite systems. Information required in the report ? Identify the number of parcels on the quarter section and adjoining quarters ? Describe proposed land use/type of development expected expected sewage volumes used in assessment considerations type of proposed or existing system(s) land area required for PSTS system at the expected volumes used in assessment considerations. Required: Take soil samples from borehole or test pit to assess soil, determine soil water conditions, and submit soil samples for laboratory soil texture classification; Optional: Percolation test may be conducted but is not required ? Determine surface slopes and surface drainage characteristics ? Consider information from complete evaluation and classify the parcel as: 1. unsuitable except for holding tank 2. severe limitations 3. moderate limitations 4. well suited Page 31 Interpretations, conclusion or recommendations to be included in the report. ? Comment on number of parcels and density of development within the area of assessment Make comment on suitability of proposed and/or existing system(s). ? Make comment on system types not suitable for the proposed parcel(s) ? Identify soil characteristics that limit the selection of and/or the long term suitability of an onsite sewage system ? Document soil characteristics using the PSTS Soil Assessment Field Form (or equivalent) ? Document results of percolation test (if conducted) ? Identify surface slopes or drainage characteristics that may limit system selection, design or location. ? Identify suitability of parcel and make comment on why it is placed in that classification (Use Tool #8 "Assignment of PSTS Suitability Type" as a guideline) Benefits provided from the Level Two Assessment • Reduces occurrence of unexpected requirements having to be met by owner of parcels - i.e. open discharge not allowed. • Identifies opportunities for smaller parcel sizes. • A clear site assessment provided by the proponent reduces time and resources required by municipality in considering the subdivision proposal. • Money and resources expended for the assessment will benefit the owner at • the time of development and when designing the sewage system. • Minimizes the chance an unplanned layout of the development will severely limit choices in designing and locating a system. • Minimize possible impact(s) on adjoining property, e.g. encroaching on a neighboring well or PSTS system. Key information obtained from a Level 2 Assessment • Limitations on site due to parcel size; • Suitable and unsuitable system types for the parcel • Expected sewage volume used in assessment consideration • Limiting soil or groundwater conditions • Topographic limitations • General suitability type of parcel for PSTS installation (see Model Process Tool #8**) • Recommended location for the proposed system based on soil/site assessment 0 Page 32 ? t-I 11 Council Agenda Item 7(e) To: Reeve and Members of Council From: Planning and Development Date: April 26, 2005 Issue Adoption of new MDP. Background Staff (MPC and MDP Committee) are pleased to present to Council a new MDP for their consideration. (MDP attached.) Discussion The MGA requires, as part of the process to adopt a new MDP, that Council give three readings to a bylaw to adopt a new MDP. Prior to second reading, a public hearing must be held. Recommendation Having considered the draft MDP and public submissions, if Council is satisfied with the MDP Staff recommend that 3 readings be given to the required bylaw. Or, If Council would like changes or additions made, or additional information provided for Council's consideration, Staff recommend that the first and second reading be given to the required bylaw and that third reading be withheld until Council is in receipt of, and has considered, any additional required information. ?G c? Fix Jer y Fenton Pl g Department • 66 0 Council Agenda Item #7(f) TO: Gene Kiviaho Reeve Hoppins Members of Council FROM: Rob Mayhew DATE: April 21, 2005 Issue: 2005 Dust Control Program Background In 2002, the Dust Control Program was presented as a trial program using a blade mix crude oil product. The Dust Control Program was offered in 2003 and 2004. Discussion Feedback in general has been positive the three years. Financial Implications The same dollars in the 2005 Budget for dust control - $100,000.00 with $50,000.00 of this amount being the ratepayers portion. The present price of oil is higher in 2005 than 2004 and 2003, but will fluctuate from now to construction season. Recommendation 1. That Council approve offering the Dust Control Program with the $1.00 rebate per lineal foot for 200' to max 400', as per Policy for 2005. 2. That Council direct Administration to select an application deadline date and roceed with advertisement of this program for 2005. Rob a ew G Kiviaho Public Works Superintendent CA' 69 • Council Agenda Item #7(h) To: Reeve Woods Members of Council From: Gene Kiviaho, CAO 4 Date: April 21, 2005 Issue Kneehill Regional Emergency Management Agency (KREMA) Background There were several suggestions arising from the Community Summit held in February with respect to regional protective services. Suggestions included regional partnership agreements; regional training; regional emergency response exercises; development of a regional disaster plan and establishment of a regional emergency management services agency. On April 18, Kneehill County conducted a meeting with various emergency services representatives and there was full support to proceed with the establishment of the Kneehill Regional Emergency Management Agency (KREMA). Don Huestis along with representatives from Acme, Carbon, Linden, Three Hills and Trochu attended the meeting. Discussion This initiative is consistent with the direction resulting from the Community Summit and the County Strategic Plan. The participants agreed to approach their respective Councils and recommend that they endorse the concept of creating a Regional Agency. The next meeting of the proposed KREMA is scheduled for Thursday, May 5. It is expected that KREMA will adopt a working model and discuss related matters. This is another regional partnership opportunity for the County and municipalities within the County to continue to foster and enhance positive working relationships. I encourage Council to endorse this important initiative. Recommendation That Council endorse the concept of establishing a Kneehill Regional Emergency Management Agency. is Ge e Kiviaho Chief Administrative Officer 71 It Council Agenda Item #7(j) TO: Gene Kiviaho Reeve Woods Members of Council From: Lavinia Henderson Date: April 22, 2005 Issue: Tax Penalty Bylaw Background: Council passed motion -numbers 182/05, 183/.05 and 184/05 at the April 12, 2005 Regular Meeting. These motions set the basis for the new Tax Penalty Bylaw where current taxes remaining unpaid as at November 1 and December 1 would be penalized at a rate of 2% of the total current outstanding, and arrears would be penalized at a rate of 2% per month. Discussion: Much difficulty was encountered in trying to formulate a clear statement concerning Council's intent for penalization of arrears. Finally, section 4 was divided into two sections to make it clear arrears from 2004 were to be penalized in November and December of this year and all arrears from January 1, onward would be penalized on the first of each month for as long as the arrears remained outstanding. Recommendation: a) That Council proceed with first and second readings at this meeting. b) That Council proceed with third reading at the May 10, 2005 meeting. inia Henders n Director, Financial Services 0 73 • BYLAW NUMBER 1506 BEING A BYLAW OF THE COUNCIL OF KNEEHILL COUNTY, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, TO ESTABLISH THE DUE DATE FOR TAXES AND PROVIDE FOR THE IMPOSITION OF PENALTIES FOR THE NON PAYMENT OF TAXES. • WHEREAS Section 344 of the Municipal Government Act being Chapter M-26, Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000, as amended, provides that a Council may by bylaw impose penalties in the year in which a tax is imposed if the tax remains unpaid after the date shown on a tax notice with the penalty imposed at the rate set out in the bylaw and not imposed sooner than 30 days after the tax notice is sent out. WHEREAS Section 345 of the Municipal Government Act being Chapter M-26 Revised Statutes of Alberta, 2000, as amended, provides that a Council may by bylaw impose penalties in any year following the year in which a tax is imposed if the tax remains unpaid after December 31 of the year in which it is imposed with this penalty rate set out in the bylaw and the penalty not imposed sooner that January 1 of the year following the year in which the tax was imposed or any later date specified in the bylaw. WHEREAS the Council of the municipality of Kneehill County in the Province of Alberta, desires to impose penalties on current and arrear taxes that remain unpaid on the due date shown on the tax notice. • NOW THEREFORE THE COUNCIL OF KNEEHILL COUNTY, IN THE PROVINCE OF ALBERTA, DULY ASSEMBLED ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: In this bylaw a. "Current taxes" shall mean all taxes which are imposed or levied in the current year; b. "Arrear Taxes" shall mean all taxes that were imposed or levied in a previous year or years. 2. Current taxes levied in any year shall be due and payable in full on or before the 31St day of October. 3. a) In the event of any current tax not being paid in full on or before the 31St day of October in any year, there shall be added to the unpaid taxes, by way of penalty, on the 1St day of November, an amount equal to two percent (2%) of such unpaid taxes. b) In the event of any current tax not being paid in full on or before the 30th day of • November in any year, there shall be added to the unpaid taxes, by way of penalty, on the 1St day of December, an amount equal to two percent (2%) of such unpaid taxes. 4. a) For taxes deemed to be arrears which remain unpaid on the first day of November and December in 2005, there shall be added, an amount equal to two (2 %) percent of the then unpaid taxes. 74 0 b) Commencing January 1, 2006, all arrear taxes outstanding on the 1St day of each month of each year, there shall be added, an amount equal to two percent (2%) of such unpaid taxes for so long as they remain unpaid. 5. A penalty equal to 2.0% of the amount added to the tax roll of a parcel of land pursuant to Section 553 or Section 553.1, of the Municipal Government Act, shall be imposed, where the amount so added remains unpaid for more than 30 days after the date the County has sent a notice that the addition has occurred. 0 6. A penalty imposed pursuant to this bylaw is part of the tax in respect of which it is imposed. 7. If any date specified in this bylaw as a penalty date falls on other than a normal day of business for the County, then the penalty date shall be deemed to be the next normal business day. 8. This bylaw shall take effect for the 2005 tax year and remain in force from year to year until repealed. 9. Nothing in this bylaw shall be construed to extend the time for payment of taxes, or in any way impair or restrict any remedy available to Kneehill County for the collection of taxes. 10. This bylaw shall, upon receiving third and final reading, come into effect and as of that date. 0 11. Bylaw Number 1479 will be repealed in its entirety. COUNCILLOR moved first reading to this bylaw this day of A.D. 2005. CARRIED COUNCILLOR moved second reading this day of A.D. 2005. CARRIED COUNCILLOR moved third reading to Bylaw #1506. CARRIED DONE AND PASSED IN A REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL THIS DAY OF , A.D. 2005. Reeve Chief Administrative Officer • 75 0 • 0 a) 0 c E m a) ti V C CL o p y C V C) y ID C Y o m o L m a - L C O a _. C m O C N m c C7. c c E cn Y, -p ¢ ° c m n a o h i W ID) c 8 a v a C O? O: 0 0 o m o u > co a) Q) E T a = .._ C C 0 C T 0 L N a N O= O >, O C O O C Z U W C U N °? C N .C C d O N L U 3 m <.-- a m C .0 U a O O: C C Y 0 0 '- 0 n E 0 O O t3 a f6 C O '? N - 'V N 7 7 F- 0 O N U p E `c m O _O C a U U c S 0 0 Z C C V c C C 0 0 V 'J Q m N C o O T N C O O I U C C to O E N 7 N O N N N a) O E N N O U m - V C U D U o ' O C ? O O U . N N v n N m a Q o a U E 0 o o o v v ?? m w U E m `y a) o p o o m O c m m ` .a w •a a N 0 O IL C C C C C C C C C C C w a) C m co m C CEE M .M C C W a) ) 0 a) 0 a) a) 0 0 m a) N (0 U` 0 () a) Q) 0 0 0 a) 0 C a) (D C C a) N N O > > > C) U (? 0 J J' J - _ > > J _- r C p N U .? t V aJ L ? C U 2 O ' L i0 52 C E C C 0 :3 C o C .0 L O) C 3 0 C U p a L ID M D a CO O _ Q ' a O N p O a N 0 % o ' ' C O 7 p ° Y .O L - ` N Q c . O C G 3 Q U N M ti - 0 L U m a) a) L O E C 1 .2 Z _ Y C J C: :-° aC Y Q) y a '?> m D . N in c m '. p U O 0 U 0 N J -O N E C 7 . C V (D 'O Z (' -0 m N °) a ) fA 7 m Q (? p 0 C '7 1 m "O C U Q ' V O J C 0) E5 E- - .5 L > .0 > 2 j 4] Q > j Y ' O M a N C J¢ 'a y y 0 7 N E- •p L O . O O m ) C) l C 3 Q1 V ' U, ' O O U; E t>° co a N + j 0 N O c. - -0 aa) .N b Q L T 3 j c C Y O U lIj O ?• Q m , 0 N m « O N J O v U 0 U > > a) a 0 Co p O N C ?, a d ^? UI Q C Q) a) 7 O _ (cri N ' O y c U 1 9 7 N L N m p L C O v¢ O N _ U a) w ?? , L t v CO T )° N. N !-' 7 N (? m a) vi Co a) L - 7. Q) j 7 N C O C l C N O C >• y y p O 5 T C L L O a) N ' N Ct k 3 Q. N a) m y O, ' U') ? . J >> m 0 _ O C 1 F- J T t Oi N (, O 0 O> O O LN C Q wL. m [L Q, O U Q) 'IT U m co co 7 m u g L N p I T 6 Q) =' C m 0 1 0 U .n L Y U A O m' Q) O N a- O °) V U 5, O¢ O'.. m a) o V O N Q O p L v d O m Q O a 0 O O N m ltd c O E E p 0 L C U N LL a- O] U O N _ U O a O ` N 0 m , p o o c N C 0 U O C W C: 0:0 m a) u) + N ' d Q N r O m 0) (D U O p 8 = °i a) 1 U O a) > to 0 t 5 I O U Y I/) p d m C C O C > t0 U .C jn C O a) > C C 0 S a C a) L 0) j) w Oj C P C J ¢ U 7 U a ?- N C O V ON L C a) Q O O C w y L C o U 0 < Y 9 O L o y O) 0 'r c o C ' m O U .n o _ Q U U E > O` c c v m a) L m v r a T 'O m c L O) o v m m o u c It Q Q a cm: U t n a) m O 0 co LC? Ncc J Y? U 1? = C 0 '15 9 o )c° T > ?? J a N VI Q 3 ?1 m n T a) c E N E a) m N ' N O ° n U •O m _ U co c m C m-o a) 0. c O a) O N- p J o C r .0 CL n m co N m c O N a i C d c p J W c O C' 3 ;?- C 0 ._ a i 0 Y u C m -0 O Q C V a a) m 0 E T O O U O m ti v >• •= ?° a a) y C m Y E Y C C U y - L u i C y: C y E E U N o p O (n '0 a) o L a) d m Y o C O a) 0 m ]. 7 p ST O m U o O .? > c O H O C O o t .o U` o •? L= ,6 J p V c o D > > o v E v v w °) .- 0 ? o c a o o > a E c ' m a c » o O a) a o o 3° = o U E m a Q ' a)) c o O y C N a, (` o= v 0 >' . 0 m O U O E C V 0) 4 0 E ' N > .2 L W E > m E Y r m p ¢ _ m a m> o p 3 •U ? a L m m o {- r O O O U )° . C O O N ) 0 C y . D - J O N= L O ¢ ,- O Y 'C O ~ >) M N N E O) '0 > fA 7 U O O m .O V = V Y N a - J C O 3 C ._. Y O ? E O L Q. ?N ?J - C C ?- T U C a U C U) T q ? V l p 0) V 0 v o a) U CO a) a a) E 0 > 0 n C _ 0 C `n O U d ) W V W 7 (n m N Q) C O a O j 0 m U 0 J _ _ m c) a) U C N 0) c O m 7 a3 U N _ 0 C Q) p N Q J; i ? m m C C y _0 ¢ LL Q - _ C - N '> p1 o N N U h 0 y N a _ U N ¢ a) N a N cm N O U y N .U a v v .n) C J C a 0 0 a) - L p V O m m a) a, CC a) c co J c `I: [[) ° - 0) -- -- . , - !' - o v ) p o )n O tG W (U i h 0 . rr„ N ) 04 U v 0 C E W a) N Y O I Q U c C 7 W '- A a O N ? O 3 U 0 O m ? v 'n z Z > Y U N 'a c o - d M a > o c v 0 d U 0 h o L v v Q O Y a uj U .x Co U Y O Z?i p > a cr. ?c :32 E 4: . Q v a u p v'= C m -) ¢ p C C C W W ... u ¢ m .0 O J m v U O C Q p .. o o U ?. O U C °i O.m O r0 m c - > C O C m j T 0 O 0 v C C: > > m C J Q ?- J 0 O U' O U cr A J (Y 2 0 0 : U O U 0 U O Z ,..? C 0 C 0 0 0 ' Q W O C . T l a O N 0'3 N y- V ) v •7 y R U m Sc C N •7 U ) 0 ` ° N v v U w 0) v ¢ d ` Y d ` p U N ¢ a U C. '$ d D a s ` C O 0 O m m m m co m m co LL W W W C C v W W C v W W cl c v v v v c C v W a c W W C v W C C > v C C C C > '> '> •? C N C •C C > ) W W Q U U U , C7' U (.7 0 0 0 J J J J J J J J N v tUi' o= ° u L N a) p v m 2 d y C a) c N W a 75 W a c L 7 m °> 3p o i 0 o U nil - W C7 O o E U m v o c e w p • _ = N N O O N J 7 7 c d 0 C m C y y E N Q. O v 7 m E m N O CO W m ? W V1 m? a 0 > m J i a) r N E m 7 i O `" 7 m a c m 0 E o U ' a U" N m a ' E c u o- u ° m ¢ p? > m m N o Q' b -0 p 0, S vcv i , M o6 rn Oa an d IV (U!) tea-) Z-0C L' W m w m Ei d -S 0 m L m p co ll U ^ ) Q G =n m a`+ O m T 'Z a co c Y 7 v7 y_- L - Ei w 3 m O W' C O > W Q O . C 7 C = a W O 'O N ?- Lo u C a l :z O N ` 10 L '?- a v C f6 O J ° w y m W O ) ? •L T Cl iy 3 ' C Q E 7 ? i.. W v o 0 O v m 0 C m 't m e o W m _ I J R O o Q ] W a 0 C: 0 y C 0 E W m C ) L 0 C U E O W ¢ m O C: N = a L:? a O r O m O U Y a j U U ( (D C o N c C v a) [) L "U 0 C: 41 a a ) ?L L r a _ c v u C m- p U I- o- O d E ° ) C N a ) E C L" m U - a T m Z 7 a (7 th N N N d N E S m m ° m ` > o m Y m W y d a, 3- 3 N r _ rn u c O i W i d > U N T m o 3 C _ 0 Y a) m ?- L Q) m a p m E E .N C N ' d 0 3 ?' .- S C p 10 m' j d ? L W O j L ¢ W U v O, n N O V C m 'O ) O) W W a On N . m p J J U V 1 E j d p E 3 C >- N W C E r C ) 7 3 N_ 1N m n U W .C L L Q C > v a) d O L vv 0 0 L v C O N C O W V O Q 0 CO 1 C a Y d y N , ° 3 o s N C n Q O W W E L L U a a) N v C -0 O v O LT m =) O - C v> 4 V 0 O iv - _ (6 C 3 L ° W - E E O ' O j L 0 O to V N C 7 L U7 m N ) i O) U m y a 0 C 7 T v p N ) fn " ) d u v 7 6 O ? 3 m W > E W L U V C V O (a 7 0 U C C? m .C C) U 7 C7 < W E U W O O •C m m L L O C 0? V 3 O N 7 O L 7 72 0 T N - ' T W C 0) W ._., .j L a-0 m O j N 0' V? W > O) C fN 9 a a y v N U m N O C U ) p. C 3 y ) O o y a V -0 U C y o ' C c o y y . C Q a u a C 7 W W m fn Ix ?: W t n' O N j - QI Q 0 N U O 2 L o E > v v O ) O C N 0 x W > O v C 7 v 2 C 7> C U O m U N > U W - 7 p in > D U a) c C N u = ]„ 'O O 6 _ O c' 1 °£ c U C D - a ? O N °> ? 3 O F, w d O 7 o :S N a 2 0 W a L 7 O o a E O ° a W y a 0 j O' O 'N ) m p c m u t c o CO Q U W N n 0 O O .6 U 4) N E 7 '0 Co W N ) N 0 c` r Q Y n O J c > O m T N 7 v 7 O: 7 n T m d • 0 1 (n ?) O U m N ?) C r? 7 7 a` O ` V F= C- Q C U. ' ° O L m> U - ' ° °' O N O C - m C m - d 0 y c U W ti 7 L o w a 0 3 _ 7 0 w c _^ ti c - W = W m V C 'C m L co 0 - m co m C - ° a) K > U) Q Y d < O LL Q d )- < Q H U Q F- C: C) 2 2 =i F - < Q Q C 0 Q 0 Q LU M p n II is • • a) E 0 U O C E a) a, C a) c 0 0 -o 0 - - ------ ---- _ s n 0 F o o o C ,U o U c U .U - C C C = ? o =1 U O = - O O O U N m a) C y °' c L c? : o o c n m (D c -C C u , ti :r a aa)i o '` o N an d v W Y L O U Y Y D7 O to c U o. C a r_ N a) J CL .O ED a O m' O O O L F > 'o O N C C p.. U C C CL Q - a) O U 9 w p J R Z c ?, N N 7 m U = (P Q) co Y 1 Y 3 Q) U C c° c: u L) ¢ ° o a o a > o > o ° -o U o a ?'I o c o a) Q co n a m c m F- U O 7 U C) T U •? O' U ' U O () a) ati O L.L ?O C Z U C C N O O C C C1 O C . CC v O _ m C ' O c CD 'C O > 'ma C y) ° O C C( C C m N, c a) a I C o S? N C c -2 oo ¢ o o °-? ?° o u c o omo ?oo U E o o -oo o i a a CIO -- - - u= - u .o U __, ._ o --_- -- o T m m u U U 0 m o Q 0 2 N N O o a' O o O L o (u J C o LL C a q)I ? o a) m a '' m I a) o m C C' C CII C ` ` C G W a) 0 C C a) a)II 0 0 C a) 0 C. a) 0 c a) 0 C c' () a) 7 C C' a) a) c C'. a) C. ' a1 d m N .0 O m a) , a)I O O > C > N Q) C 0 U C7 C7 ' 0 0 ? 0 0 (9 0 .0 .0 0 Y U. m o ° o o m c m 0 ai U m I e ID o _ E x W o 0 j C ro •? . W p - c U o `o N ' 51 N m a a) ) c m N c U S E I y c a) ca ax c u o? o a C a N U a co U v .] j 'Q ro 0 p car) o z U 'O ? L 9 O. Q C >` Q) o C a a c a) .] H . to ' ? o O p ° a) L '5 m ro O 11 N 3 o. u Q V U E a 3 °0 N o >' D O J O ?N N O U . O O O T L C 0 •C _ C C a O C T .C iEy b3 U ' N -0 C N .a 11 L C ` Q N M W O C O U O O O O O . c a) a 0 U- a C a u?I 5 ?? rn ?C2 U ?? ?V - E O aa> 7 _ cl- m I L L 5 - ' a C Y t . a O) W v) N u v ° E a m .? -0 D C v c W W o m '0 n> ? c °' = s C o o v ] o m _o r. >m . C- i °N ?i_] Z o to v O t U ay O n' c cm >• Z O d V C = N = N N 0 y Y C N C Q °. 7 7 U ? C) N ti '>O T L a to o C (h 3 U v m m n E E o Q o o o m c a v m N m ) n H 5 C Q _ I < _ N 2 o O N c Cj a E u ' U 0 N C D o m o C vroi N 7 Cm o._ a 1 V) O a) a , L a) L a1 .N O N' N I J i - O _ - N L C j 1 p m ] U U !n _ o U m N o .? n o 7 Q 2 C U O N O 7 C O' O a) C a) C . L U' C > l U ?? C O a) U C C C m•, N ?. l (a c l!] C (0 rj C N CL C C cu , 0 `_ c a ° '- aa) 0 Y I ' Y c, O m a. m C o - - ?q m 3 n YI ?' m y in v moo N m_ U cn F a N o u O) _ c m c - a E '6 p) c O 7) n m o- n ` ` `y u'] 3 a o o N c It m o a V' 0 O C °) C C f.. N, o . r l ° Y to ?p N 0 6 m °i d o O - E O C o O IL J G a U ?! N c, a' J o C b N C I I N _ O a M? 7 C E C 7 a o E 1 y 6 ] 0 5 O o o n y u a ) ] ' . ° •? a a'. m T° d', ` ° o m v o c •_ m ° a °U E U O o o NO O N 'SON ¢ O.N n N O m ro'N' C OC UI O i m Q o 6 ¢ ? m E - rnm - m m `Ny CO)`? W o ? '., o d Q? v w m a) a) ? j a) a). o or'= ro T .. L li ni o a)O ,4 4 w au). o a) m u E - U S - n ° > L v >o ? ? aL a' d ¢ 3 F o ° U r Q Q La. U.0 0 ` a m 2 a¢ 2 a - U - - -- - O - -'J -- - ?I d ] ] m T U O i C a O > G U Lo ° U C) C ` O a) n U m T > Q ' D C C - ro a) c w ?' a d S c T- m: d o c 5 a c ° o o .N v c 0 N m .? c LL LLI z O U ._ Z. C a C L N L 0 O C [v ti o a Y6 C W o . m° O `-] n ) C C o > A r 6) ? o o a G ? I f- -- ¢m - <¢ - c a - ` ¢ - > CL N Qa S r. Q HU QQ Q ?, o . u q o q Ll? - q o c? 0 o Ln 0 o c In o n :' c c a $ N . $ a ` n c n W - _J .N N ry N M µ.' L7 cD F C Fa 5 PENDING BUSINESS ITEMS FROM 2002 - April 26, 2005 Mountain View Emergency Service (56-02) - Sept 24/02 - Gene and Greg will meet with Mountain View County to discuss this outstanding item. Meeting with CAO first part of March 2005. Mutual Aid Agreement (52-02) - Oct 8/02 - Mountain View and Wheatland County still pending. Feb 05 KAS looking into Mountain View agreement. Feb 2/05 Wheatland County looking into agreement. Water Policy (16-02) Equity Water - The Water Policy is on hold until current developments have been resolved. Water Policy: A policy to encompass the costs of lowering any water lines will be presented to Council at May 10, 2005 Council Meeting. PENDING BUSINESS ITEMS FROM 2003 - April 26, 2005 Fire Agreements (73-03) Fire Agreement with Three Hills signed. In March 2005 Acme, Carbon, and Linden signed master fire agreement. Greg and Gene to meet with Trochu within the next two weeks. Foreign Animal Disease & Mass Livestock Mortality Disposal (including BSE) (94- 03) - July 22/03 Bruce Sommerville, Jeremy Fenton, developing contingency plans for the County. Greg, Jeremy, & Bruce will prepare a report on plans in case of disease outbreak to Council in May 2005. Recycling Policy (136-03) Sept 23/03 Discussed at March 23' Committee of the Whole meeting. Councillor Holsworth presented terms of reference of a Waste & Recycling Study to Regional Partnership Initiative Committee for consideration. Committee has taken no further action. Waste & Recycling under discussion by the Community & Cultural Summit. PENDING BUSINESS ITEMS FROM 2004 - April 26, 2005 Bylaw Enforcement Officer (#6-04) - Jan 13/04 Currently on a monthly basis -2005 budget approved to hire as a permanent employee. March 05 advertising for position. Posting closed. Applications yet to be short-listed. Huxley Property for Sale (#20-04) - Feb 10/04 Tax forfeiture properties were advertised for sale. May 251/04 Council refused only offer as too lo?? Administration to look at a way of marketing to get the market ' alue for the property. Feb/05 Advertised in the Capital and on v ebsite Report to Council April 12/05 Second offer refused. • Kneehill County Water Strategy (#52-04) - May 11/04 Ongoing - Jan 25t C.M. John VanDoesburg presented draft funding package for Council consideration. Issues being addressed (Three Hills Water West) Linden North Water Service Area (#53-04) - May 25/04 Jan 25/04 Council approved proceeding with Phase One of the Linden North Water Service Area. Letters sent to Linden North Phase I & 2 residents giving information on the waterline. Items for discussion on-going, presented at upcoming Council meetings. Agreement signing Sunnyslope Hall on March 7th - Stantec updated at March 8th C.M. March 22nd some funding decisions made. Ongoing. Recreation Areas/Parks (#82-04) - Sept 14/04 Long term plan requested. Included in 2005 Draft Budget. Will be further developed and presented to Council using the assigned budget dollars. Approach Policy (#83-04) - Sept 14/04 On April 26` Council agenda. Tax Payment Incentives Policy (#84a-04) On July 2005 Council agenda. Community Grants Procedure Change (#85-04) Tabled until after the February 4t grant funding deadline - Requested changes to be presented at June 14`h Council Meeting Community & Cultural Services Summit (#86-04) - Oct 12/04 Nov 13` First meeting with Council and CAO's from urban centres and the County. Feb 1St & 2d follow up meetings with facilitator Gord McIntosh. Working committee of CAO's established, and Steering Committee comprised of Elected Officials. List of 12 possible issues for sharing. Working committee meetings scheduled March 17th and 29th at County Office 9.00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. Working Committee meeting held April 11th in Carbon. Next meeting scheduled for May 3"' in Acme. Councillor Policies (#89-04) - Oct 26/04 Council approved amendments. Policy book needs to be updated and circulated. EnCana Corporation Texas Gate Request (#93-04) - Oct 26/04 Council declined request to install Texas Gates and referred Policy #13-29 for review, and a recommendation made to Council. Texas Gate policy on April 12`h Council agenda. Council approved Texas Gate policy with amendment. Amended policy in April 26. 2005 info package. Partnering Options of WVater Reservoirs (#95-04) - Oct 26/04 Council requested options and possibilities of partnenng with urban centres for the building and shared use of water reservoirs. Under review with water strategy :J E Laptop Purchase Policy (#99-04) - Nov 9/04 Council requested further information on purchase options & recommended policy. On Council agenda for April 12, 2005. Council approved table style laptop purchases for Elected Officials, CAO, Recording Secretary, and Council Chamber (180/05 & 181/05). 0 PENDING BUSINESS ITEMS FROM 2005 - April 26 2005 Preparation of a Tax Penalty Bylaw (#182/05, 183/05, 184/05) - Apr 12/05 Council approved administration to prepare a Tax Penalty Bylaw with the minimum tax being increased from $25.00 to $35.00, and outstanding current and arrears taxes are penalized starting November 1 S` at a rate of 2% per month, compounded. Subscription/Advertising Contract (#189/05) - April 12/05 Council directed Administration to negotiate the contractual renewal with an increase to $6.00 per unit. Kneehill Water Services Commission RFP (#190/05) - April 12/05 Administration to submit proposal on a 1 year trial basis, for Operator Services of the KRWSC. Waste Transfer (#191/05) - April 12/05 • Administration directed to investigate options for a sorting depot to be located at the Three Hills Waste Transfer Site to be used by KC rural residents. On June 14, 2005 Council Agenda. 0 r 0 • • 0 C o D a) d) Ct Ct +?+ O p a) Q) Q) U o -C C c E o c (D a) a a _ C a) ° E a) O E E c E _ E E o E U o ° 0 ° o ° C) o U) co o V) ` L C i O :ED . t7 L c co o o? y > E C a) O N U C -p C O O Li- v0. O N a to L C -0 :F N Q CU = Q) cu o a a C D 0 w O .r 0 0) c U> is C c a) c C N o c 0 Q M io Z' 0 j C (n rn a) c Ur L D > U> a) c) C ?, ?,. L o V d) 0 U •a O 2 0 o a o N O to ?O U i a) i w i y C c m - - a L a -O? 0 a LO U') CL x U '0 c E CD 0 0 amp -oU Q a i O O 0 V CN LL a) U c o C) V) O E m O U L > C) C C C Q) U C -E N m CD a) CD Q) C7 m 0 °?' m C7 co 7 CD C L 0 C '' O O cOi a) .n c E a) o o c o c) Q U ILI E Y co E o > C c C 0 0 0 C L. o O 4- O O , M C) O (0 O o6 U 0 Q - 0 a ? Ct N M Q CO O CU < O y V a) O U p 0 in G C) 0 Q y (n g L Ct 0) > U) 0 O ,?o to ca. 3 U m 'o U o a) a) ??Q ? o mg ?»? C) O o C Q o Z 42- O .. Li 0 v) O U % O U voi o V) a) (n (D o N o o 0 c° 0 w C C to O N a o U w O W j c ° c a C N L . E O °' ? W = c N a) ) a Q 6 a 0 C- ) L D o c a? U c E Q M CO C v o o c o `O d ) u) C: C 0 0 O E o 0 C V v - m Q,W E o 0 U U U a c ° U O m y) ct n) O fu E U a U ai C) 0 0 0 0 0 LU 0 LO LU - r ?- U) LU 0 0 0 0 Q r r N 00 CO CO CO C C C C G C - .C -Q co U. LL lL Q) f O O C O MO U U 16 ` O U) 3; = v C (D C o C C C O Q ?- Ln Ft N = V) a > Q) o v) U C) 0 E L ` n Q) RS m a) C? a C C t U >L O > U V Q O U) CX (n U LL U U > C W m m v) J L Q Q CD 0 LU o In O to o to O tP o to In 0 Lf) o U) O L7 o C) *k k ?t :rt 4t U 4t ;t U _ *.` • (n = Q) (1) c a 0 Q L o F- a) O > 0 CY) C) L •0 "0 "0 D C O 0 L• (d O O a) _O Q) O L _N O C Q - 4) O Q) Q) Q) O U a) a) a ' p o c Q c o a L C) U E E E c E E E o ai 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 C d O O C L O 0 N O E- U) (a C ` C 0 U (0 (D r ) N C 0 C D o f E C 0 ° -a o C) c co 0 0 .0 c _0 C a) 0 m r C Q) CD (n 0 -0 C. m O 0 ir- 0 Co 0 co LL C a) E. ate) (6 U) 0 C N C LD :U) m a ? ? 7 Cc ? c 0 c 0 0 _ C o 0) m -0 0 m Q) C O -0 Q 0 _0 0 C C D r ? M. a U= .O 0 (B 0- Q) a) 0 0• C N L - Q) C a) CO L ('? a) .C C Q) ° L- •U > Q) •() •E Cc E V • 0 L LL a) 0 Q) 0) •- m L U Q) L Q) U -? Q) (6 0 C 00 0) 7 Q -0 C C 0 E O C L (..) 7 Q) m Q C) ?Y ? o °? o n U mm0 Q U 0 (z U 0 N U) a) - 6 .0 ..0 E C C V) m m m m co co (D U' co > (2) (1) O 70 0 4) O m O 0 0 C7 CD O 73 C: J C Q) (6 I U (D U) Q) O O p O O 2 Q Y c o U o -0 0 Q ) a a) o 0 U 3.r > > > ) E 0r a o m 0 c c 0 o L (O A W O L 0 L L iy L 4- U N Q Q] > F ° m N Q) •_ N CD- _0 Q C > ( Q Q O Q Q c c - a) U O -0 a) c U) C (t Ct Q) 0) (a O (0 O O E ` 0 > o ? -0 Q 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 U0- 0 U 0 C D C 0 C :3 C O :3 0 C> =1 C :3 C 1 m O C n C :3 O N O D O 0 O 0 O 0 O= (4 O 0 0 O (6 2 U E U U U (fl U is U U 12 4? U U Ln U) U) LO U) U) (n O O O O 0 O U) LC) U) CD N N N N N O O O co N N N N N N co Co CO ..0 _O . .0 .0 .0 .0 - - LL LL LL LL LL LL LL C o Q O Q) co 0, C Lz o6 n U O CO Q Ln CD O > 0 Co Q Q Q) F- > O 0 U U C U) 0 CJ) C _ U O Q C Q) U) C O Q) .? E E O Q C C 0) a) u) Q C O 2 U .O C Q) >. 0) C C) 0 L 9- (6 o J V) Q.. ._ C ? C E (n (6 C c C (d U O c Q) 0 (0 Q U L (ti U 0 U E E ? Q) -O a) co - o 2 m Q C U a) O a) O) 0 -U o C Q) O 0 Q) 0 0 (3 O Q < 0 (C, O O Q) Q) - C) w F- CL U U (n < W W U Z> < < U C 2 N LL > > lL O LY O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O r N (`7 C) U) (U f- co Ci) 0 F- I L i • C co ° a) CI] co O U C6 > vC U U U) M 0) C U U cn ' E E o Q 0 0 Y c o o D L " O U o o c° a U > a Q to 0) C: U C C O 0 N t/? 0) U O E -a E cn U -0 =_ Q -0 - C m C - O - _ O 2 0- c o E o `- D O C U C O o m o U F a N Q a W O U 0 LO V O C -0 N -0 U) C: B ) O U U U U > 0 0 N -0 (D N CV (0 -0 p L d U Rs Q v Q . C) C (U U N- v E to to a) CT C U cn U C CL L L .C O a) (B (6 N ll M O V Q O O .C .L U U Q_ N }- U N U E U O U I a) U c U o c °? C I a o C7 cc co 0 U C U (t 0 C w L. O O U C cu m o ti U ,Q C U C C N C 0 7 U ? Q? wr O L L 0 Q w: ri _0 C) E > ct i co a y 0) rt O L E C > w O °Q_ o U a O Q_ O , U _0 C) Z3 -0 c C C O (6 U U O O y O O C :3 U) Q) co ca- (D Q le Q) U Q 69 cc 4 Q V) V) to LO u') O O XZ) N N O \ O N N co co N N L L L L 'i 'i Q Q CG L U Q U C m .__I U C V U ? O U n C O • cu U) (D y N a) J Q U) UH X u) it) in Lo L) to O i O O O C) O O - N M 4 LO 4t 3 3t • LY ?A ? --o 40 i r o ? 1 0 0 CIF W z