HomeMy WebLinkAboutBylaw 1806 - Kneehill and Wheatland County IDP - FebruaKneehill County &
Wheatland County
Intermunicipal
Development Plan
Bylaw No. 1806
&
Bylaw No. 2019-33
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 3
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 5
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ................................................................................................................................ 5
1.2 MUNICIPAL PROFILES ................................................................................................................................... 8
1.3 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS....................................................................................................................... 8
2 PLAN AREA ...................................................................................................................... 11
2.1 PLAN AREA CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................... 11
2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 18
2.3 OTHER PLANS ............................................................................................................................................. 18
3 INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES ........................................................................ 20
3.1 GENERAL LAND USE POLICIES .................................................................................................................... 20
3.2 AGRICULTURE ............................................................................................................................................. 21
3.3 RESOURCE EXTRACTION & ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................. 22
3.4 RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................ 23
3.5 TRANSPORTATION...................................................................................................................................... 23
3.6 TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS / UTILITIES ............................................................................................. 24
3.7 RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................................. 25
3.8 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................................................... 25
3.9 WATER QUALITY AND FLOOD PROTECTION............................................................................................... 26
3.10 INTERPRETATION ....................................................................................................................................... 27
4 PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................ 28
4.1 INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMITTEE ............................................................................... 28
4.2 INTERMUNICIPAL REFERRAL POLICIES ....................................................................................................... 30
4.3 PLAN VALIDITY ........................................................................................................................................... 32
5 DISPUTE RESOLUTION ................................................................................................... 34
5.1 GENERAL DISPUTE PROCESS ...................................................................................................................... 34
APPENDIX A | DEFINITIONS
4 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
Table of Maps
MAP 1: REGIONAL CONTEXT.......................................................................................................................................... 6
MAP 2: IDP PLAN AREA ................................................................................................................................................ 12
MAP 3: SOIL CLASSIFICATION ...................................................................................................................................... 13
MAP 4: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................................................. 15
MAP 5: HYDROLOGICAL AND ROAD NETWORK........................................................................................................... 16
MAP 6: ENERGY ........................................................................................................................................................... 17
MAP 7: LAND USE DESIGNATION ................................................................................................................................. 19
Table of Figures
FIGURE 1: DISPUTE RESOLUTION FLOW CHART .......................................................................................................... 36
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 5
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN
The purpose of the Kneehill County and Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan (IDP) is to foster
a collaborative planning approach for lands along the common border between the two counties (see Map
1). The Municipal Government Act (MGA) mandates municipalities that share common boundaries to develop
an Intermunicipal Development Plan.
Municipalities are mandated to work together to adopt IDPs to:
• promote consultation, coordination and cooperation regarding planning matters of joint interest
within a defined planning area;
• provide a framework for addressing land use concerns with regard to joint planning matters;
• establish procedure for dealing with development proposals within a defined planning area; and
• address any other matters relating to development considered necessary within a joint planning
area.
An IDP is a planning tool that can provide numerous benefits to participating municipalities, which may
include, but are not limited to the following:
• municipal cost-savings, as a result of infrastructure and service sharing, which also provides residents
with a higher quality of life;
SECTION 1.0 | INTRODUCTION
6 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
• reinforcing and protecting both municipalities’ development philosophies and goals while mitigating
the potential for future intermunicipal conflict; and
• ensuring development for both municipalities occurs in an orderly, economic, efficient and
harmonious manner that is sustainable by considering existing development conditions and future
municipal goals.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 7
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
Map 1: Regional Context
8 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
“The purpose of the Kneehill
County and Wheatland
County Intermunicipal
Development Plan (IDP) is to
foster a collaborative
planning approach for lands
along the common border
between the two counties.”
The Plan contains policy that is to be used as a framework for working cooperatively, communicating and
making decisions in each municipality. As such, the IDP must also provide for the following:
• Conflict Resolution Procedures;
• A process to amend or repeal the Plan; and
• Documentation for administration of the Plan.
These procedures will provide more clarity between the partnering municipalities to ensure the
administrative functions required through the Plan are understood. Each municipality is ultimately
responsible for making decisions within their own municipal jurisdiction.
1.2 MUNICIPAL PROFILES
Kneehill County
Kneehill County is located in south-central Alberta spanning an area of
331,900 hectares (820,143 acres), situated between Red Deer County
to the north, Mountain View County to the west, and Starland County
to the East, and Wheatland County to the south. The majority of the
land is zoned for agricultural uses, allowing the population of 5,001
(Statistics Canada, 2016 Census) to enjoy a rural way of life. As a
region, Kneehill County with the Towns of Three Hills, Trochu and
Villages of Acme, Carbon, Linden, and four hamlets, have a combined
population of over 11,000 residents. Oil and gas is the second major
industry in the region. The County’s goal is to protect this rural way of
life while proactively enhancing it. The eastern border of Kneehill
County runs along the Red Deer River Valley down to the heart of the
Canadian Badlands, making tourism a viable market opportunity.
Wheatland County
Wheatland County covers an area of approximately 460,000 hectares (1.1 million acres), with a population of
8,788 (Statistics Canada, 2016 Census). Wheatland County surrounds four urban municipalities and contains a
number of other hamlets and communities not officially designated as hamlets. The County is bordered by six
rural municipalities, two towns (Drumheller & Strathmore), three villages (Rockyford, Standard & Hussar) and
one First Nation. A portion of Wheatland County around Strathmore is within the Calgary Metropolitan
Region Board jurisdiction. The economy of Wheatland County is based on agriculture, including beef and
grain production. In recent years, industry, manufacturing and oil and gas development have played key roles
in the County’s economic growth.
1.3 LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS
Intermunicipal Development Plans (IDPs) are now mandatory for all municipalities to complete with their
municipal neighbours. However, Bill 25 amended Section 631 of the Municipal Government Act (MGA) to
include a new subsection that states if the two municipalities that are mandated to enter into an IDP agree
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 9
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
they do not require one, they are not required to enter into one.
Municipal Government Act (MGA)
The Intermunicipal Development Plan was prepared in accordance with the requirements of Sections 631,
636 and 638.1 of the Municipal Government Act (MGA). The MGA mandates that when an IDP is completed
between neighbouring municipalities, and the document must address the following items:
i. the future land use within the area,
ii. the manner of and the proposals for future development in the area,
iii. the provision of transportation systems for the area, either generally or specifically,
iv. the co-ordination of Intermunicipal programs relating to the physical, social and economic
development of the area,
v. environmental matters within the area, either generally or specifically,
vi. any other matter related to the physical, social or economic development of the area that the
councils consider necessary,
and
b) must include
i. a procedure to be used to resolve or attempt to resolve any conflict between the municipalities
that have adopted the plan,
ii. a procedure to be used, by one or more municipalities, to amend or repeal the plan, and
iii. provisions relating to the administration of the plan.
10 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
Page intentionally left blank
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 11
SECTION 2 – PLAN AREA
2 PLAN AREA
2.1 PLAN AREA CHARACTERISTICS
The Plan Area consists of an area approximately 1.6 to 2.5 km (1.0 to 1.6 miles) on either side of the shared
municipal border. The Plan Area consists of approximately 19,640 hectares (48,532 acres) and is illustrated
on Map 2.
Key characteristics of the Plan Area include the following:
AGRICULTURE & SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
• Agriculture is the primary land use of the area.
• There is a mix of agricultural operations including grazing, irrigation, and crop
farming in the area.
• The region contains a variety of soil characteristics that range from poor crop
capability to crop capability with no limitations. For example, as shown on Map
3 soil classes 1 through 7 are present, resulting in a diversity of agricultural
capacity and associated agricultural activities.
KneehillCounty
StarlandCounty
WheatlandCountyRockyViewCounty
Carbon
Rockyford
Drumheller
MidlandProvincialPark
Serviceb e r ryCreekKnee h i ll s Cre
ekSe
vern
Cr
e
e
kAtu
si
sCreekTwp: 27Rge: 22
Twp: 28Rge: 22
Twp: 27Rge: 23
Twp: 29Rge: 23
Twp: 28Rge: 24
Twp: 29Rge: 24
Twp: 27Rge: 25
Twp: 28Rge: 25
Twp: 28Rge: 20
Twp: 26Rge: 21Twp: 26Rge: 22
Twp: 29Rge: 22
Twp: 28Rge: 23
Twp: 26Rge: 23
Twp: 27Rge: 24
Twp: 26Rge: 24
Twp: 26Rge: 25
Twp: 29Rge: 25
Twp: 28Rge: 19
Twp: 26Rge: 19
Twp: 27Rge: 19
Twp: 26Rge: 20
Twp: 27Rge: 20
Twp: 27Rge: 21
Twp: 28Rge: 21
Twp:29 Rge: 19
Twp: 29Rge: 20Twp: 29Rge: 21
30
31
8
17
32
18
32
6
18
1516
20 23
26
31 36
5
7 9 10
1417
20 22 23
2526
33 36
145
9
1417
24
26
32
7 9 11
1618
19 20
2529
31 36
10
1417
21 24
27
35 36
246
8
13
20 21 23
30
33
16
12
15
1518
19 22 24
31 33
15
8 10 11
18
20 21 24
2829
31 34
245
8
14
20 23
25
31 36
4
7 10
1417
1317
19 21
29
36
235
12
1315
24
2630
32 34
24
11
131518
24
25
33 34
235
8 10 12
15
17
22
2628
34 35
8 9 12
131617
19
26
34 36
3
13
19 24
2830
31 34 36
24
11
18
13
23 24
26
35
12
14
2
12
23 24
26
1
19
16
20
6
17
27
20
22
33
6
22 24
28
32
2
9
18
12
16
20 22
35
1
9
17
13
24
28
2
11
13
19
30
3
13
18
2728
11
19
28
24
28
34
3
18
1923
31
5
10
33
5
12
20
7
13
36
11
34
11
5
7 12
15
31
4
7
18
27
32
4
11
18
1417
19 22
29
33
31
5
10
14
19 23
32
46
11
14
6
31
5
8
17
8 12
1518
24
27
31 35
26
12
26
10
1517
13
1
14
25
35
2
14
13
21 23
30
32 36
3
9 12
26
15
22
25
36
6
11
1316
21
5
13
15
21 24
30
33 36
7 11
18
20
21
26
34
36
16
23
26
33
27
35
1
1418
2729
13
10
14
4
15
29
9
19
2
1815
22
11
26
16
11
21
7
18
1
11
7
17
1816
17
9
31
15
35
11
19
324
19
30
12
35
1
35
30
16
27
25
6
10
7
13
35
29
6
35 36
29
8
22
7 9
20
2529
36
21
4
30
5
21
12
13
27
35 36
16
15
27
17
27
29
1
8
32
27
4
18
28
1
16
1
23
34 35
25
10
1414
23
29
16
25
35
13
5
6
16
8
25
34 35
18
20
17
26
18
13
24
1517
33
25
18
7 11
17
23
12
20
29
31
34
27
4
22
3
14
36
9
22
17
30
13
20
22
10
25
5
17
30
4
1314
1
33
16
24
21
29
2
8
15
24
17
27
10
16
8 12
25
34
23
3
19
15
31
8
2628
13
19
26
6
19
28
3
31
18
14
22
33
5
25
7
1417
9
31
1316
32
26
18
32
7
15
33
5
1315
14
9 10
2728
9
26
28
7
2
33
13
30
1
34
22
36
7
30
11
32
2
35
25
12
30
6
23
19 21
28
3
36
30
9 12
12
14
21
32
23
31 32
32
16
34
10
15
16
34
23
1
22
28
6
8
20
25
35
29
29
14
29
2630
16
20
27
24
21
32
5
23
DunphyEntice
Gatine
Beynon
Wayne
Nacmine
Redland
Sharples
Hesketh
Rosebud
")21
")10
")9
")56
UV838
UV840
UV575
UV836
UV10X
UV576
UV569
UV841
Map and data for informational and planning purposes only.
Legend
Wheatland County - Kneehill County Shared Boundary
IDP Plan Area Boundary
Municipal Boundary
Map 2: IDP Area
Wheatland County - Kneehill CountyIntermunicipal Development Plan
December 2019
0 2 4 6 81km
Carbon
Rockyford
Drumheller
DunphyEntice
Gatine
Grainger
Beynon
Wayne
Kirkpatrick
Nacmine
Sharples
Hesketh
Rosebud
KneehillCounty
StarlandCounty
WheatlandCounty
RockyViewCounty
MidlandProvincialPark
Se rviceberryCreekRosebud River MichichiCreekA t us i s C reekKneehillsCr e e k
")10
")9
")21
")56
UV838
UV840
UV575
UV836
UV10X
UV576
UV837
UV569
UV841
Legend
Wheatland County - Kneehill County Shared Boundary
IDP Plan Area Boundary
Municipal Boundary
Soil Classificaiton
1 - No significant limitations in use for crops
2 - Moderate limitations that restrict the range of crops or require moderate conservation practices
3 - Moderately severe limitations that restrict the range of crops or require special conservation practices
4 - Severe limitations that restrict the range of crops or require special conservation practices
5 - Very severe limitations restricting capability in producing perennial forage crops, and improvement practices are feasible
6 - Capable only of producing perennial forage crops, and improvement practices are not feasible
7 - No capacity for arable culture or permanent pasture
8 - Organic Soils (not placed in capability classes)
Map and data for informational and planning purposes only.
Map 3: Soil Classification
Wheatland County - Kneehill CountyIntermunicipal Development Plan
December 2019
0 2 4 6 81km
14 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 2 – PLAN AREA
NATURAL LANDSCAPE
• The unincorporated community of Beynon is primarily a private 500+ acre
ecological preserve. It is located within a deeply sculpted portion of the Rosebud
River valley and the area is recognized as being regionally significant.
• The Rosebud River defines part of the border between the two Counties. The
river valley area in both Counties is environmentally significant. Some
conservation efforts exist in the area.
• Environmental features are shown on Map 4: Environmental Considerations
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE
• Highway 9 is the main transportation corridor in the Plan Area. There are a
number of regional intersections along Highway 9. The major intersection is
Highway 9 and Highway 21, a major north-south corridor that runs parallel to
Highway 2.
• The CN Calgary-Drumheller line also defines a portion of the border between the
two municipalities. There are setbacks (dwellings, berms and fences, noise
attenuation barriers, etc.) that both Counties will have to consider.
• Transportation Infrastructure is shown on Map 5: Hydrological and Road
Network.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
• There is minimal residential development within the Plan Area, primarily
farmsteads and acreages.
• The unincorporated community of Beynon is located within the plan area.
ENERGY
• There are numerous energy facilities within the Plan Area including wellsites and
pipelines as shown on Map 6: Energy.
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D
Grassland ESA'National'Rating
Carbon
Rockyford
DunphyEntice
Gatine
Grainger
Beynon
Wayne
Kirkpatrick
Nacmine
Sharples
Hesketh
Rosebud
Drumheller
KneehillCounty
StarlandCounty
WheatlandCounty
RockyViewCounty
Se rviceberryCreekRosebud River MichichiCreekA t us i s C reekKneehillsCr e e k
")10
")9
")21
")56
UV838
UV840
UV575
UV836
UV10X
UV576
UV837
UV569
UV841
Legend
Wheatland County - Kneehill County Shared Boundary
IDP Plan Area Boundary
Municipal Boundary
Sand And Gravel Deposit
Alberta Wetland Inventory
D D D
D D D
Environmentally Significant Area
Historic Resource Value
*Alberta Culture and Tourism - Historic Resources Management Branch
HRV 1 - Provincial Historic Resource
HRV 2 - Registered Historic Resource
HRV 3 - Historic resource that will likely require avoidance
HRV 4 - Historic resource that may require avoidance
HRV 5 - High potential to contain a historic resource
Map and data for informational and planning purposes only.
Map 4: Environmental Considerations and Historic Resources
Wheatland County - Kneehill CountyIntermunicipal Development Plan
December 2019
0 2 4 6 81km
Township Road 280
Township Road 284
Township Road 281
Township Road 275A
Range Road 195A
Range Road 210ARange Road 243Range Road 250Range Road 233Township Road 272Range Road 251Range Road 232Range Road 242Range Road 234Range Road 241Range Road 244Township Road 282
Range Road 20510XHig
h
w
a
y
Township Road 290
Town ship Ro ad 280RangeRoad214A
Range Road 195Township Road 274
841
HighwayRange Road 235Range Road 201Range Road 223Range Road 225Range Road 230Range Road 245Range Road 231Range Road 215RangeRoad203To w n s h ip Road 275Range Road 222Range Road 200Range
Road204Range Road 213RangeRoad212Range Road 214Carbon
Rockyford
Drumheller
DunphyEntice
Gatine
Grainger
Beynon
Wayne
Kirkpatrick
Nacmine
Sharples
Hesketh
Rosebud
KneehillCounty
StarlandCounty
WheatlandCounty
RockyViewCounty
MidlandProvincialPark
R osebu dRiver
Serviceb erryCreekAtusisC reekKneehi l lsCr e ek
")10
")9
")21
")56
UV838
UV840
UV575
UV836
UV10X
UV576
UV837
UV841
UV569
Legend
IDP Plan Area Boundary
Municipal Boundary
Provincial Paved Highway
Paved
Unpaved
Railway
River/Stream
Water Body
Map and data for informational and planning purposes only.
Map 5: Hydrological and Road Network
Wheatland County - Kneehill CountyIntermunicipal Development Plan
December 2019
Carbon
Rockyford
Drumheller
DunphyEntice
Gatine
Grainger
Beynon
Dalum
Wayne
Kirkpatrick
Nacmine
RosedaleStation
Sharples
Hesketh
Rosebud
KneehillCounty
StarlandCounty
WheatlandCounty
RockyViewCounty
MidlandProvincialPark
ServiceberryCreekRoseb u d RiverSever
nCreekA t us i s C reekKn e e h illsC r e ek
")21
")56
")9
")10
UV838
UV840
UV575
UV836
UV10X
UV569
UV841
UV576
Legend
Wheatland County - Kneehill County Shared Boundary
Municipal Boundary
IDP Plan Area Boundary
!Wellsites
Water Pipeline
Sour Gas Pipeline
Natural Gas Pipeline
Oil Pipeline Map and data for informational and planning purposes only.
Map 6: Energy
Wheatland County - Special Area 2Intermunicipal Development Plan
December 2019
0 2 4 6 81km
18 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 2 – PLAN AREA
2.2 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
The existing land use designations are determined by each county’s land use bylaw and
are predominantly agricultural with the Agricultural General (AG) district in Wheatland
County and the Agricultural (A) district in Kneehill County covering the area as shown on
Map 7: Land Use Designations. The Land Use Designations shown on Map 7 are
provided as a point-in-time capture for information purposes only and are subject to
change without amendment to this Plan.
2.3 OTHER PLANS
The area in proximity to the shared border between Wheatland County and Kneehill County continues to be
dominated by agricultural land uses and does not have a substantial amount of non-agricultural
development. While on-the-ground development has not yet proceeded the only major approved
development within the area is the Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP, a mix of recreational and residential
development north of the Rosebud River.
Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP
The Badlands Motorsports Resort Area Structure Plan (ASP) (Kneehill County Bylaw No. 1597) was approved
in June 2013 to support the development of a recreational resort for motorsport enthusiasts. The
development spans 425 acres north of the Rosebud River, and will include recreational, commercial, and
residential components.
All Existing Land Designation: Agricultural (A)**
All Existing Land Designation: Agricultural General (AG)*
Carbon
Rockyford
Drumheller
DunphyEntice
Gatine
Grainger
Beynon
Wayne
Kirkpatrick
Nacmine
Redland
Sharples
Hesketh
Rosebud
KneehillCounty
StarlandCounty
WheatlandCounty
RockyViewCounty
MidlandProvincialPark
")10
")9
")21
")56
UV838
UV840
UV575
UV836
UV10X
UV576
UV837
UV569
UV841
Legend
Wheatland County - Kneehill County Shared Boundary
IDP Plan Area Boundary
Municipal Boundary
Area Structure Plans
Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP
Rosebud ASP
*Wheatland County Land Use Bylaw 2016-01: Updated May 2 2017, Subject to Change**Kneehill County Land Use Bylaw #1718: Updated September 27, 2016, Subject to Change
Map and data for informational and planning purposes only.
Map 7: Land Use Designations
Wheatland County - Kneehill CountyIntermunicipal Development Plan
December 2019
0 2 4 6 81km
20 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
3 INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
The land use policies contained in this Plan are intended to provide direction to Kneehill County and
Wheatland County administrations, subdivision and development authorities and Councils to encourage and
manage the future development of lands contained within the Plan Area.
3.1 GENERAL LAND USE POLICIES
INTENT
The general land use policies address matters that apply to the entire Plan Area and are intended to provide
an overall guiding direction for the IDP. Agriculture is intended to be the primary land use in the area;
however potential growth centres identified in each municipality’s statutory plans (e.g. MDP or ASPs) may
identify potential areas for non-agricultural land uses that will be dependent upon market and land owner
interest. Each municipality will ensure non-agricultural development is designed in a smart, sustainable and
advantageous form.
POLICIES
3.1.1 The primary land use in the Plan Area is agriculture and grazing.
3.1.2 Non-agricultural development within the Plan Area shall be aligned with each municipality’s
municipal development plan (MDP) and should be located along major highway corridors
and/or within growth centres as identified in a MDP or other statutory plan (e.g. ASP).
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 21
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
3.1.3 The municipalities, as per this Plan, shall strive to engage in effective dialogue when
considering land use in the Plan Area, while still maintaining complete jurisdiction on lands
within their own boundaries.
3.1.4 The municipalities may collaborate and investigate methods of giving support to projects that
may mutually benefit or enhance the quality of life of residents from both municipalities. This
could be in the form of in-kind donations, materials, municipal letters of support, unified
government lobbying, application for grants, or other more permanent arrangements upon
mutual agreement.
3.1.5 Both municipalities agree to jointly discuss ways to cooperate with provincial and federal
agencies and utility providers to help facilitate the efficient delivery of infrastructure and
services that are of a mutual benefit.
Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP
3.1.6 The policies outlined in the Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP (Kneehill County Bylaw No. 1597)
apply exclusively to lands that fall within the Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP Boundary as
illustrated in Map 7. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this IDP, as it relates
to those lands falling within the Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP Boundary, the
municipalities agree that the applicable policies shall be those set out in the
Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP.
3.2 AGRICULTURE
INTENT
Agriculture and grazing will continue to be the primary land use in the Plan Area, and non-agricultural uses
should be considered only in such areas where they will not negatively impact agriculture and grazing.
POLICIES
3.2.1 Agriculture and grazing are the primary uses in the Plan Area.
3.2.2 Both municipalities will strive to work cooperatively to encourage good neighbour farming
practices, such as dust, weed and insect control, adjacent to developed areas through best
management practices and Alberta Agriculture guidelines.
3.2.3 If disputes or complaints in either municipality should arise between ratepayers and
agricultural operators, the municipality receiving the complaint shall strive to direct the
affected parties to the appropriate agency, government department or municipality for
consultation or resolution wherever necessary.
22 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
3.3 RESOURCE EXTRACTION
INTENT
Resource extraction is recognized as important to the local economy and to the maintenance of
transportation routes and other infrastructure. However impacts from resource extraction operations may
affect nearby lands and must be addressed through proper siting and operation practices.
POLICIES
3.3.1 Upon receipt of a development application for a new or expanded natural resource extraction
operation within the Plan Area, the municipality shall forward a copy to the other municipality.
3.3.2 Upon receipt of a notice of application from a provincial agency for a natural resource
extraction operation within the Plan Area (e.g. Code of Practice application notice from
Alberta Environment & Parks) the municipality shall forward a copy to the other municipality.
3.3.3 When evaluating an application for a new or expanded natural resources extraction
development the approving municipality shall ensure the development provides evidence of
how it will mitigate the potential negative impacts of dust, noise, traffic, air, and water
pollution.
3.3.4 Each municipality must be notified of any natural resource extraction development proposal
in the other municipality that will result in access being required from a road under its control
or management. After the application is deemed complete the affected municipality must be
notified of the application and give its comments in writing within the notification period. If
comments are not received within the notification period it will be determined the
municipality has no comments.
3.3.5 Either municipality may require an agreement regarding the construction, repair, and
maintenance of any municipal roads which may be impacted by natural resource extraction
development, when the development requires access to come from the other municipality’s
road.
3.3.6 If either Kneehill County or Wheatland County are in receipt of a notice for a new or expanded
Alberta Transportation gravel pit or other natural resource extraction operation within the
Plan Area, they shall forward a copy of the notice to the other municipality.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 23
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
3.4 RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT
INTENT
The availability of wind, sun and other renewable natural resources in both municipalities allows for the
potential of large and small renewable energy developments. However, the appropriate siting of these
types of developments is critical to minimizing the impacts to adjacent lands and local infrastructure.
POLICIES
3.4.1 If an application for a renewable energy development is proposed within the plan area, the
municipalities shall consider the application’s compatibility with existing land uses.
3.4.2 Either municipality shall refer to the other municipality any application, after it is deemed
completed, for a renewable energy development (e.g. WECS 1 & 2, solar farm) within the Plan
Area. Small scale renewable energy developments that either do not require a development
permit or are listed as a permitted use in the applicable Land Use Bylaw District do not require
referral to the other municipality.
3.5 TRANSPORTATION
INTENT
It is important that each municipality take into consideration the impact of development on provincial
highways and municipal roads located within the Plan Area that form the area’s transportation
infrastructure.
POLICIES
3.5.1 Each municipality shall be notified of any subdivision or development proposal in the other
municipality that will result in access being required from a road under its control or
management. The affected municipality may request to obtain any associated traffic studies
and must give its comments in writing within the notification period. If comments are not
received within the notification period it will be determined the municipality has no
comments.
3.5.2 Each municipality shall be notified of any road closure or development of an undeveloped
road that will result in access being increased, decreased or removed for a road under its
control or management. The affected municipality may request to obtain any associated
traffic studies and must give its comments in writing within the notification period. If
comments are not received within the notification period it will be determined the
municipality has no comments.
24 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
3.5.3 Either municipality may require a developer to enter into a road use agreement to control
traffic, manage dust control or maintenance issues if access to the development is required
from a road under its control or jurisdiction.
3.5.4 When required by Alberta Transportation, developers shall conduct traffic studies with
respect to the impact and access onto provincial highways. Any upgrading identified by a
traffic study conducted by a developer with respect to a highway shall be implemented by the
developer at its sole cost and to the satisfaction of Alberta Transportation.
3.6 TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS / UTILITIES
INTENT
Telecommunication towers and associated infrastructure is largely outside the jurisdiction of municipalities
despite potential impacts to the local area. Municipalities have the opportunity to provide comments to
applicants and approving authorities/agencies regarding applications within the Plan Area and municipality.
POLICIES
3.6.1 Where there is an application for a new, expanded or retrofitted telecommunications tower
within the Plan Area, the municipality within which the application is located shall refer the
application to the other municipality for comment. If the municipality in which the application
is located chooses to send a letter in response to an application for a telecommunications
tower (sometimes referred to as a ‘Letter of Concurrence’) to the approving authority/agency
the municipality shall include any comments received from the other municipality. If the
municipality in which the application is located chooses not to send a letter it shall instruct the
adjacent municipality to send their comments directly to the approving authority.
3.6.2 When providing a response letter or Letter of Concurrence for a new, expanded or retrofitted
telecommunications tower, Kneehill County and Wheatland County shall request
telecommunications companies to co-locate within the Plan Area where technically feasible.
3.6.3 When providing comments to provincial and federal departments regarding utility
development within the Plan Area, Kneehill County and Wheatland County shall request that
consideration be given to the establishment of utility corridors with multiple users.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 25
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
3.7 RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
INTENT
To ensure recreational related development occurs in a harmonious and efficient manner with the natural
landscape that surrounds it.
POLICIES
3.7.1 Both municipalities may consult with other agencies to develop management plans which
integrate land use, development and recreational activities.
3.7.2 Policies within existing adopted Area Structure Plans (i.e. Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP)
will continue to apply within the Plan Area.
3.8 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
INTENT
The Rosebud River is found within the Plan Area, which provides a multitude of ecological and aesthetic
values and potential for both Counties, and its residents, including the Beynon ecological reserve. Both
municipalities recognize the connection between the natural environment and quality of life and strive to
balance development with the protection, preservation, and enhancement of natural systems and
environmentally significant areas.
POLICIES
3.8.1 When making land use decisions, each municipality will:
a)utilize and incorporate measures which minimize possible impacts on the Rosebud
River and any other important water resources;
b)determine appropriate land use patterns in the vicinity of significant water resources
and other water features;
c)establish appropriate setbacks to maintain water quality, flood water conveyance and
storage, bank stability and habitat.
3.8.2
3.8.3
For proposed development on lands within the Plan Area that may contain an environmentally
significant site, an environmental/biophysical impact assessment (EIA/BIA) may be
required to be completed by a qualified professional to the satisfaction of the approving
municipality at the sole cost of the developer.
For proposed development on lands that may contain a historic resource, a Historical Resource
Overview (HRO) or Historical Resource Impact Assessment (HRIA) may be required to be
26 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
completed by the developer to the satisfaction of Alberta Culture and Tourism. The developer
must comply with the Historical Resources Act and Alberta Culture and Tourism.
3.8.4 Both municipalities should consider the provincial Wetland Policy and Stepping Back from the
Water Policy when making land use decisions with the goal of sustaining the environment and
economic benefits.
3.8.5 Areas identified as environmentally sensitive or environmentally significant through federal,
provincial, or municipal reports, policies or plans or through supplemental professional studies
should be protected through the use of Environmental Reserves, Environmental Reserve
Easements, Conservation Easements, or other appropriate methods as determined by the
municipality and its applicable Municipal Development Plan policies or Land Use Bylaw
regulations.
3.8.6 Development on slopes and river valleys within natural areas is generally discouraged.
However, where development is proposed on these natural features, it will proceed only in
accordance with the respective municipality’s statutory plans, applicable bylaws, and other
municipal policies and regulations.
3.8.7 Subdivision and Development in or adjacent to river valleys shall take into consideration slope
stability and soil characteristics in order to minimize negative impacts.
3.8.8 Either municipality shall refer any new environmental or biophysical study or report in support
of a planning or development application pertaining to lands within the Plan Area to the other
municipality.
3.8.9 Either municipality shall refer to the other municipality any new or amended municipal bylaw
or policy pertaining to environmental or biophysical matters within the Plan Area.
3.8.10 Policies within existing adopted Area Structure Plans (i.e. Badlands Motorsports Resort ASP)
will continue to apply within the Plan Area.
3.9 WATER QUALITY AND FLOOD PROTECTION
INTENT
Water is a precious resource. Water is used by agriculture, residential, commercial, industrial and
recreational developments. It is important that both Counties consider the impact of development on water
quantity and quality as well as the broader watershed impacts. Furthermore, protective measures should
be taken to ensure developments are not located within flood prone areas.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 27
SECTION 3 – INTERMUNICIPAL LAND USE POLICIES
POLICIES
3.9.1 Where new development may affect water quality, appropriate water and wastewater
treatment and collection systems shall be considered using Best Management Practices in
each County.
3.9.2 Development in identified flood fringe and floodways as per provincial mapping (if completed)
shall comply with provincial regulations and legislation. Where land use and development is
to occur in flood prone areas not identified on provincial maps as either flood fringe or
floodway appropriate regulations shall be implemented to ensure no negative impacts on the
land and neighboring County
3.10 INTERPRETATION
INTENT
To ensure the policies and language within this Plan are as clear and concise as possible.
POLICIES
3.10.1 All references to a specific agency, body, or department were accurate at the time of writing.
All references throughout the Plan shall therefore be considered to be applicable to the
current relevant agency, body or department.
3.10.2 Unless otherwise required by the context, words used in the present tense include the future
tense; words used in the singular include the plural; and the word person includes a
corporation as well as an individual. Unless otherwise stipulated, the Interpretation Act,
Chapter I-8, RSA 2000 as amended, shall be used in the interpretation of this bylaw. Words
have the same meaning whether they are capitalized or not.
3.10.3 The relative boundaries or any variable presented on the maps contained in this Plan, with the
exception of the boundaries of the Plan Area, shall be interpreted as an approximation and
not a precise depiction of its actual or full extension.
28 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 4 – PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
4 PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
The administration and implementation polices contained in this Plan are intended to assist Kneehill County
and Wheatland County administrations, subdivision and development authorities and Councils with the initial
and ongoing execution of this Plan over its lifespan and define the roles of each municipality in the Plan
execution.
4.1 INTERMUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMITTEE
INTENT
The implementation of this Plan is intended to be an ongoing process to ensure it is maintained and remains
applicable. A committee with joint representation will ensure continued dialogue and cooperation, as the
purpose of this committee is to promote active cooperation and conflict resolution through a consensus-
based approach.
POLICIES
4.1.1 For the purposes of administering and monitoring the IDP, Kneehill County and Wheatland
County establish the Intermunicipal Development Plan Committee (the Committee)
comprised of an even number of members of Council from both Kneehill County and
Wheatland County. Each municipality may appoint an alternate Committee member in the
event a regular member cannot attend a scheduled meeting. Alternate Committee members
shall have standing.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 29
SECTION 4 – PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
4.1.2 The term of appointment for Committee members should be as determined by each
municipality. Following each election, Members of the Committee shall be appointed by
respective Councils at their Organizational Meeting. If a Council wishes to appoint a new
member to the Committee (including the alternate), they must do so by motion of Council at
a regular Council meeting. The municipalities shall notify one another upon appointing
members and alternate members to the Committee.
4.1.3 Kneehill County and Wheatland County agree that the main functions of the Committee are
to:
a) create a forum for dialogue on issues of common concern and interest;
b) address concerns regarding the policies of the Plan;
c) address proposed amendments to the Plan;
d) address issues in relation to the implementation of Plan policies;
e) engage in resolving any conflicts or disputes which arise from this Plan;
f) both municipalities will equally share costs associated with using outside assistance
to resolve a dispute; and
g) address any other land use issues deemed appropriate, but which are not explicitly
identified in the Plan.
4.1.4 Meetings of the Committee shall be held on an "as needed basis", or at the request of either
municipality. Committee meetings should be held as soon as possible if any conflict arises, or
if any matter is brought before it.
4.1.5 A municipality may call a meeting of the Committee at any time upon not less than five (5)
days' notice of the meeting being given to all members of the Committee and support
personnel, stating the date, the time, purpose and the place of the proposed meeting. The
five (5) days' notice may be waived with three quarters of the Committee members’
agreement noted.
a) The municipality that called the meeting of the Committee shall host and chair the
meeting and is responsible for preparing and distributing agendas and minutes;
b) At least one (1) member of each municipality’s administrative staff should attend
each meeting in the capacity of technical, non-voting advisor;
c) Both Councils agree the Committee is not a decision making body and that the
Committee shall issue a written response in the form of comments and/or
recommendations to each Municipal Council within 10 business days from the
Committee meeting date;
d) Any changes to the Committee format, composition, roles, responsibilities or any
aspect of its existence or operation may be requested by either municipality;
30 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 4 – PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
e) Where a matter has been referred to the Committee and a resolution cannot be
found, the Dispute Resolution process in Section 5 of this Plan should be adhered
to.
4.2 INTERMUNICIPAL REFERRAL POLICIES
INTENT
The purpose of this section of the Plan is to establish clear and consistent expectations and protocols
pertaining to the referral process for applications within both municipalities.
POLICIES
General
4.2.1 Where an intermunicipal referral is required by policies contained in this Plan, both
municipalities agree to provide the other municipality with the required landowner
information for the circulation area.
4.2.2 Where a plan or bylaw, including amendments, or application, requires notifications to be sent
to a municipality that is external to this IDP, the referring municipality shall follow the referral
requirements outlined in the Municipal Government Act (MGA), or where applicable, those
contained in a relevant Intermunicipal Development Plan.
4.2.3 Kneehill County and Wheatland County may wish to notify the other municipality of major
municipal infrastructure or public works projects within the Plan Area (e.g. major road
upgrades, bridge construction).
4.2.4 Where required by the MGA, a relevant statutory plan, land use bylaw or policies of this Plan,
applications located outside of the Plan Area may be referred to the adjacent municipality.
Response Timelines
4.2.4 The responding municipality shall, from the date of notification by either postal mail or
electronic mail, have the following timelines to review and provide comment on
intermunicipal referrals:
a) 21 calendar days for all subdivision or development applications,
b) 21 calendar days for all redesignation applications, and
c) 21 calendar days for all other intermunicipal referrals.
4.2.5 In the event that either municipality, the Committee, or any other referral does not reply
within the response time for intermunicipal referrals stipulated in this Section, it is presumed
the responding municipality and/or Committee has no comment or objection to the referred
planning application or matter.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 31
SECTION 4 – PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
Statutory Plans
4.2.6 A newly proposed Municipal Development Plan or amendment shall be referred to the other
municipality for comment prior to a public hearing.
4.2.7 A newly proposed statutory plan or amendment pertaining to the Plan Area shall be referred
to the other municipality for comment prior to a public hearing.
Land Use Bylaws
4.2.8 All Land Use Bylaw amendments pertaining to the Plan Area, shall be referred to the other
municipality prior to a public hearing.
4.2.9 All redesignation applications within the Plan Area shall be referred to the other prior to a
public hearing.
4.2.10 A newly proposed Land Use Bylaw from either municipality shall be referred to the other prior
to a public hearing.
Outline Plans, Area Concept Plans & Design Concepts
4.2.11 All outline plans, area concept plans, design concepts or similar non-statutory plans in support
of a subdivision or development that are located within the Plan Area shall be referred to the
other municipality for comment prior to approval.
Subdivision and Development
4.2.12 All subdivision applications for lands within the Plan Area shall be referred to the other
municipality for comment prior to a decision being rendered.
4.2.13 All discretionary use applications within the Plan Area where no approved ASP or ACP is in
place shall be referred to the adjacent municipality for comment prior to a decision being
issued.
4.2.14 Both municipalities are encouraged to share with the adjacent municipality, the results of all
publicly available technical analyses required by a Subdivision and Development Authority as
part of an application within the Plan Area.
Consideration of Responses
4.2.15 Comments from the responding municipality and/or the Committee regarding proposed
Municipal Development Plans, other statutory plans, and Land Use Bylaws, or amendments to
any of those documents, shall be considered by the municipality in which the application is
being proposed, prior to a decision being rendered.
32 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 4 – PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
4.2.16 Comments from the responding municipality and/or the Committee regarding subdivision and
development applications shall be considered by the municipality in which the application is
being proposed, prior to a decision being rendered on the application.
4.3 PLAN VALIDITY
INTENT
This Plan may require amendments from time to time to accommodate unforeseen situations, and to keep
the Plan relevant. This Plan does not contain a “sunset” clause, but rather, a method of continuous
updating.
POLICIES
Addressing Provincial Regional Planning Requirements
The two counties are located within different provincial regional plans. Kneehill County is within the Red
Deer Regional Plan, which has not yet been completed. Wheatland County is within the South
Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP) which has been completed and came into effect September 1, 2014.
4.3.1 The municipalities agree that they will comply with any relevant adopted regional plan.
4.3.2 This Plan aligns with the strategies of the SSRP for lands lying within the boundary of
Wheatland County.
Addressing Municipal Amendments and Plan Validity
4.3.3 This Plan comes into effect on the date it is adopted by both Kneehill County and Wheatland
County.
4.3.4 Amendments shall be adopted by both Councils using the procedures outlined in the
Municipal Government Act (MGA). No amendment shall come into force until such time as
both municipalities adopt the amending bylaw.
4.3.5 Proposed amendments to this Plan by parties other than Kneehill County or Wheatland
County shall be accompanied by the following:
a) an application for amendment submitted to Kneehill County along with the applicable
municipal fee as noted in the municipal Master Rates Bylaw for processing amendments
to a statutory document; and
b) an application for amendment submitted to Wheatland County along with the applicable
municipal fee for processing amendments to a statutory document.
4.3.6 The Plan shall only be repealed if mutually agreed upon by both municipalities and under the
condition the Plan will be replaced with a new IDP that will be adopted by both municipalities
at the time of the repeal.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 33
SECTION 4 – PLAN ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
4.3.7 In the case where only one municipality wishes to repeal the Plan, 60 days notice shall be given
to the other municipality stating the intent and reasons for repealing the Plan. Both Councils
shall pass the bylaw repealing the Plan and adopting a new IDP for the repeal to take effect.
4.3.8 Should only one municipality wish to repeal the Plan, the dispute resolution process in Section
5.0 shall be initiated.
4.3.9 Administrative staff should review the policies of the Plan annually and discuss land use
matters, issues and concerns on an on-going basis. Administrative staff may make
recommendations to their respective Councils for amendment to the Plan to ensure the
policies remain relevant and continue to meet the needs of both municipalities.
4.3.10 A formal review of the Plan shall occur within 10 years from the date the IDP is adopted by
both municipalities.
34 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 5 – DISPUTE RESOLUTION
5 DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The MGA mandates that every IDP must have policies pertaining to dispute resolution.
5.1 GENERAL DISPUTE PROCESS
INTENT
The policies of this Plan are designed to be general in nature, ensuring that both Kneehill County and
Wheatland County maintain jurisdiction over the decisions made within their borders. It is anticipated that
by following the process below, any disputes or conflicts that may arise can first be avoided, and where
necessary, settled at the local level. Only in those circumstances where a resolution cannot be achieved
locally would the dispute be referred to outside parties.
POLICIES
General Agreement
The municipalities agree that:
5.1.1 It is important to avoid dispute by ensuring the Plan is adhered to as adopted, including full
circulation of any permit or application that may affect the municipality as required in the Plan
and prompt enforcement of the Plan policies.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 35
SECTION 5 – DISPUTE RESOLUTION
5.1.2 Prior to the meeting of the Committee, each municipality through its administration, will
ensure the facts of the issue have been investigated and clarified, and information is made
available to both parties. Staff meetings are encouraged to discuss possible solutions.
5.1.3 The Committee should discuss the issue or dispute with the intent to seek a recommended
solution by consensus.
Dispute Resolution
In the case of a dispute, the following process will be followed to arrive at a solution:
5.1.4 When a potential intermunicipal issue comes to the attention of either municipality relating
to a technical or procedural matter, such as inadequate notification or prescribed timelines,
misinterpretation of Plan policies, or a clerical error regarding the policies of this Plan, either
municipality’s Land Use Bylaw, or any other plan affecting lands in the Plan area, it will be
directed to the administrators of each municipality. The administrators will review the
technical or procedural matter and if both administrators are in agreement, take action to
rectify the matter.
5.1.5 Should either municipality identify an issue related to this Plan that may result in a dispute
that cannot be administratively resolved or any other issue that may result in a dispute, the
municipality should contact the other and request that a Committee meeting be scheduled to
discuss the issue. The Committee will review the issue and attempt to resolve the matter by
consensus.
5.1.6 The dissenting municipality is requested to bring a resolution of Council to the Committee.
The resolution of Council should clearly outline the concern(s) and possibly remedy requested
from the other municipality.
5.1.7 Should the Committee be unable to arrive at a consensus, the administration of each
municipality will schedule a joint meeting of the two Councils to discuss possible solutions and
attempt to reach consensus on the issue.
5.1.8 Should the Councils be unable to resolve the matter, a formal mediation process to facilitate
resolution of the issue shall be initiated.
Filing an Intermunicipal Dispute under the Municipal Government Act
5.1.9 In the case of a dispute involving the adoption of a statutory plan, Land Use Bylaw or
amendment to such, within 30 days of adoption, the municipality initiating the dispute may,
without prejudice, file an appeal to the Municipal Government Board under section 690(1) of
the Municipal Government Act (MGA) so that the provincial statutory right and timeframe to
file an appeal is not lost.
5.1.10 The appeal may then be withdrawn, without prejudice, if a solution or agreement is reached
between the two municipalities prior to the Municipal Government Board meeting. This is to
acknowledge and respect that the time required to seek resolution or mediation may not be
36 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 5 – DISPUTE RESOLUTION
able to occur within the 30-day appeal filing process as outlined in the Municipal Government
Act (MGA).
Note: Using section 690(1) of the Municipal Government Act (MGA) is the final stage of dispute settlement,
where the municipalities request the Municipal Government Board to intercede and resolve the issue.
Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan 37
SECTION 5 – DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Dispute Resolution Flow Chart
The dispute resolution flow chart shown as Figure 1 is for demonstration purposes only and shall not limit
the ability of either municipality to explore other methods of resolution or to choose one method in place
of another.
Figure 1: Dispute Resolution Flow Chart
38 Kneehill County & Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development Plan
SECTION 5 – DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Page intentionally left blank
Appendix A: Definitions i
APPENDIX A | DEFINITIONS
ii Appendix A: Definitions
APPENDIX A | DEFINITIONS
Adjacent Land(s): Land that abuts or is contiguous to the parcel of land that is being
described and includes land that would be contiguous if not for a highway, road, lane,
walkway, watercourse, utility lot, pipeline right-of-way, power line, railway or similar
feature and any other land identified in a land use bylaw as adjacent for the purpose of
notifications under the Municipal Government Act, Revised Statues of Alberta 2000, M-
26 with amendments.
Agricultural Operation: If not defined in the municipality’s Land Use Bylaw, it is an
agricultural activity conducted on agricultural land for gain or reward or in the hope or
expectation of gain or reward, and can include, but is not limited to:
a) the cultivation of land;
b) the raising of livestock, including game-production animals within
the meaning of the "Livestock Industry Diversification Act" and
poultry;
c) the raising of fur-bearing animals, pheasants or fish;
d) the production of agricultural field crops;
e) the production of fruit, vegetables, sod, trees, shrubs and other
specialty horticultural crops;
f) the production of eggs and milk;
g) the production of honey (apiaries);
h) the operation of agricultural machinery and equipment, including
irrigation pumps on site;
i) the application of fertilizers, insecticides, pesticides, fungicides, and
herbicides, including application by ground and aerial spraying, for
agricultural purposes;
j) the collection, transportation, storage, application, use transfer
and disposal of manure;
k) the abandonment and reclamation of confined feeding operations
and manure storage facilities.
Alberta Land Stewardship Act (ALSA): The Alberta Land Stewardship Act Statues of
Alberta, 2009 Chapter A-26.8, as amended.
Area Structure Plan (ASP): A statutory plan in accordance with the Municipal
Government Act (MGA) for the purpose of providing a framework for subsequent
subdivision and development of an area of land in a municipality. The Plan typically
provides a design that integrates land uses with the requirements for suitable
parcel densities, transportation patterns (roads), stormwater drainage, fire
protection and other utilities across the entire Plan Area.
Appendix A: Definitions iii
Biophysical Impact Assessment: means the assessment of the biological and physical
elements for the purpose of reducing the potential impacts of the proposed
development on the natural environment. The report details specific components of
the environment such as topography, geology, hydrology, soils, vegetation, wildlife,
and biodiversity (terrestrial and aquatic) for a specific development area. Mitigation
measures are suggested to minimize or eliminate potential environmental concerns.
Calgary Metropolitan Region Board (CMRB): The board established by the Calgary
Metropolitan Region Board regulation (Alberta Regulation 190/2017).
Calgary Metropolitan Region: The lands lying within the boundaries of the
participating municipalities of the Calgary Metropolitan Region Board.
Conservation Easement: A voluntary agreement between a landowner and a
conservation organization or government agency. The intent of the Conservation
Easement is to protect the ecological, scenic, and or agricultural values of the land.
The agreement is placed on title, and the landowner continues using the land
subject to the specific restrictions in the easement.
Conservation Reserve: As defined by the Municipal Government Act and used for
the purpose of conserving environmentally significant features that cannot be
required to be provided as environmental reserve.
Council(s): The Council of Kneehill County and the Council of Wheatland County in
the Province of Alberta.
Counties: The Municipality of Kneehill County and the Municipality of Wheatland
County.
Development: As defined by the Municipal Government Act in Part 17, section 616,
means
a) an excavation or stockpile and the creation of either of them;
b) a building or an addition to or replacement or repair of a building
and the construction or placing of any of them on, in, over or under
land;
c) a change of use of land or a building or an act done in relation to
land or a building that results in or is likely to result in a change in
the use of the land or building; or
d) a change in the intensity of the land or a building or an act done in
relation to land or a building that results in or is likely to result in a
change in the intensity of use of the land or building.
iv Appendix A: Definitions
Discretionary Use: The use of land or a building in a land use district for which a
development permit may be approved at the discretion of the Development
Authority with or without conditions.
Energy Industry or Energy Development: Industry that uses some form of
alternative energy either as the source of its operation or the result of its
operation, such as, but not limited to, wind farms, solar farms, hydroelectric dams
among others.
Environmental Reserve: Regulated through the Municipal Government Act (MGA),
it is the transference of land from the landowner to the municipality through the
subdivision process. The lands can consist of water bodies, steep slopes, gullies, or
drainage courses, and would be required to remain in its natural state.
Environmental Reserve Easement: Similar to an Environmental Reserve, the ERE
however allows the title to remain under the landowner, instead of with the
municipality. Similar restrictions apply with an easement, such that the land would
be left in its natural state.
Environmentally Significant Area (ESA) means an area defined as an
Environmentally Significant Area within the applicable land use bylaw of the
approving municipality.
Environmental Site Assessment (ESA – Phase I or II): An investigation in relation to
land to determine the environmental condition of property. It includes a Phase 1
environmental site assessment, a Phase 2 environmental site assessment and
confirmatory investigation.
Extensive Agriculture: The general raising of crops and grazing of livestock in a non-
intensive nature.
Extractives or Extractive Industry: Use of lands that are governed by the location of
a natural resource such as, but not limited to, sand and gravel, oil and gas, or
logging which involves the extraction or onsite processing and/or storage of a
natural resource.
Historical Resource Value (HRV): Lands that contain or are believed to contain
historic resources, including primarily archeological and paleontological sites,
Aboriginal traditional use sites of a historic resource nature, and historic structures.
Intensive Agriculture: If not defined in the respective municipalities’ Land Use
Bylaw, it is any concentrated method used to raise crops or to rear or keep
livestock, animals, poultry or their products for market including, but not limited to,
Appendix A: Definitions v
such operations as horse riding stables, poultry farms, pastures, rabbitries, fur
farms, greenhouses, tree farms, sod farms, apiaries, dairies, nurseries and similar
specialty uses conducted as the principal use of a building or site.
Intermunicipal Border: The shared border between Kneehill County and
Wheatland County.
Intermunicipal Development Plan (IDP): A statutory document, adopted by bylaw
in accordance with section 631 of the Municipal Government Act, which is used by
municipalities as a long-range planning tool.
Intermunicipal Development Plan Committee (the Committee): The members
assigned by each respective Council for the purposes of administering and
monitoring the Intermunicipal Development Plan.
May: Is an operative word that means that there is a choice, with no particular
direction or guidance intended.
Municipalities (the Municipalities): The municipalities of Kneehill County and
Wheatland County.
Municipal Government Act (MGA): The Municipal Government Act Revised Statues
of Alberta 2000, Chapter M-26, as amended.
Municipal Development Plan (MDP): A statutory plan, adopted by bylaw in
accordance with section 632 of the Municipal Government Act and used by
municipalities as a long-range planning tool.
Permitted Use: The use of land or a building in a land use district for which a
Development Authority shall issue a development permit with or without
conditions providing all other provisions of the Bylaw are conformed with.
Plan: The Kneehill County and Wheatland County Intermunicipal Development
Plan.
Plan Area: The lands defined in this document on Map 2 noted as “Plan Area”
(approximately 1 to 1.5 miles on either side of the shared border) to which the
policies of this document pertain.
Provincial Highway: A road development as such by Ministerial Order pursuant to
the Highway Development and Protection Act, Alberta Regulation 326/2009.
vi Appendix A: Definitions
Ratepayer: A land owner within the municipality who pays taxes to the respective
municipality and is considered a stakeholder in public matter relating to the
municipality.
Red Deer Regional Plan: The Regional Plan and regulations for the Red Deer
Regional Plan area established by Order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council
Pursuant to the Alberta Land Stewardship Act.
Renewable Resource/Energy: A natural resource or form of energy that can
replenish on its own with time.
Shall: Is an operative word that means the action is mandatory.
Should: Is an operative word that means that in order to achieve the Plan’s
objectives, it is strongly advised that the action be taken.
Soil Classifications: The classification of soils in accordance with the Canadian Land
Inventory on the basis of soil survey information, and are based on intensity, rather
than kind, of their limitations for agriculture.
Class 1 – Soils in this class have no significant limitations in use for crops.
Class 2 – Soils in this class have moderate limitations that restrict the range
of crops or require moderate conservation practices.
Class 3 – Soils in this class have moderately severe limitations that restrict
the range of crops or require special conservation practices.
Class 4 – Soils in this class have severe limitations that restrict the range of
crops or require special conservation practices.
Class 5 – Soils in this class have very severe limitations that restrict their
capability in producing perennial forage crops, and improvement practices
are feasible.
Class 6 – Soils in this class are capable only of producing perennial forage
crops, and improvement practices are not feasible.
Class 7 – Soils in this class have no capacity for arable culture or permanent
pasture land.
South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP): The Regional Plan and regulations for
the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan area established by Order of the Lieutenant
Governor in Council Pursuant to the Alberta Land Stewardship Act.
Stakeholder: A person with an interest or concern in matters pertaining to this
Plan.
Appendix A: Definitions vii
Statutory Plan: As per Part 17 of the Municipal Government Act, is an
intermunicipal development plan, a municipal development plan, an area structure
plan, or an area redevelopment plan adopted by a municipality under Division 4 of
the Municipal Government Act.
Subdivision and Development Authority: Within the boundary of Kneehill County
means Kneehill County Subdivision and Development Authority, and within the
boundary of the Wheatland County means the Wheatland County Subdivision and
Development Authority.