Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-02-27 Councl Package Amended KNEEHILL COUNTY REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, February 27, 2018 8:30 a.m. Kneehill County Council Chambers 1600- 2ND Street NE Three Hills, Alberta 1.0 Agenda 1.1 Additions to the Agenda 1.2 Adoption of the Agenda 2.0 Approval of Minutes 2.1 Regular Council Meeting Minutes of February 13, 2018 3.0 Delegations No Delegations Scheduled 4.0 Public Hearings No Public Hearings Scheduled 5.0 Corporate Services 5.1 Bank Reconciliation – November and January 2017 5.2 Policy #16-12, County Credit, Debit, and Fuel Cards 5.3 Reserve Reallocation 5.4 Policy #16-2, Accounts Receivable Collection Process 5.5 User Fee Review 6.0 Municipal Services 6.1 Transportation No Report 6.2 Water/Wastewater/Environment 6.2.1 Churchill Water System 6.3 Planning No Report 6.4 Agricultural Service Board & Parks No Report 6.5 Protective Services 6.5.1 Peace Officer Rural Crime Deterrent Initiative Proposal 6.5.2 Kneehill County Rural Fire Strategy- Fire Chief Proposal 7.0 Business Arising from Previous Minutes No Report Regular Council Meeting Agenda February 27, 2018 Page | 2 8.0 New Business 8.1 9.0 Disposition of Delegation Business 10.0 Council and Committee Reports 10.1 Drumheller RCMP Statistics 11.0 Council Follow-up Action List 12.0 In Camera 12.1 13.0 Motions from In Camera Adjournment 1 ________ Initials MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 13, 2018 REGULAR MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF KNEEHILL COUNTY AT THE KNEEHILL COUNTY OFFICE, 1600- 2ND STREET NE, THREE HILLS, ALBERTA. PRESENT: Division No. 1 Faye McGhee, Councillor Division No. 2 Debbie Penner, Councillor Division No. 3 Jerry Wittstock, Reeve (Video Conference) Division No. 4 Glen Keiver, Councillor Division No. 5 Jim Hugo, Councillor Division No. 6 Wade Christie, Councillor Division No. 7 Kenneth King, Deputy Reeve ADMINISTRATION PRESENT: Chief Administrative Officer Al Hoggan Director Municipal Services Laurie Watt Director Corporate Services Mike Morton Protective Services Manager & Communications Officer Debra Grosfield Manager of Planning and Development Barb Hazelton Recording Secretary Carolyn Van der Kuil CALL TO ORDER Deputy Reeve King in the Chair Deputy Reeve King called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. The Chair called for a recess at 8:30 a.m. due to technical difficulties and called the meeting back to order at 8:44 a.m. with all previously mentioned members present. AGENDA 1.0 Agenda 1.1 Additions to the Agenda Additions under Business Arising from Previous Minutes 7.2 March 8, 2018 Regional Partnership Meeting Additions under New Business 8.4 Strategic Priorities Chart 8.5 Centralized Assessment-Hybrid Contract 8.6 Community Futures Petition ADOPTION OF AGENDA 1.2 Adoption of Agenda 40/18 Councillor Keiver moved approval of the agenda as amended. CARRIED COUNCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 13, 2018 2 _________ Initials MINUTES 2.0 Minutes 2.1 Regular Council Meeting Minutes of January 23rd, 2018 41/18 Councillor Christie moved approval of the January 23, 2018 Council Meeting minutes as presented. CARRIED MUNICIPAL SERV 5.0 Municipal Services PLANNING 5.3 Planning 5.3.1 Intermunicipal Development Plan Committee Appointment Town of Trochu 42/18 Councillor McGhee moved to appoint Councillor Christie to replace Deputy Reeve King on the IDP Committee with the Town of Trochu. CARRIED BUSINESS ARISING 7.0 Business Arising from Previous Minutes 7.1 Policy #15-13, Rural Community Halls 43/18 Reeve Wittstock moved to accept Policy #15-13, Rural Community Halls with the removal of the Crossroads Community Centre and Funding Level C as presented. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 7.2 Kneehill Regional Partnership Meeting March 8, 2018 Item of Information: Very important meeting for all of Council to attend. NEW BUSINESS 8.0 New Business 8.1 Elected Officials Education Program Course 44/18 Councillor Penner moved to receive for information the Elected Officials Education Program opportunity being held on March 19, 2018, as part of the pre-conference program at the AAMDC Convention. CARRIED 8.2 Three Hills Arts Academy Society Request 45/18 Councillor Christie moved that Council donate $1,000.00 per year for the next four years beginning in the 2018 budget year, to the Three Hills Arts Academy. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 8.3 Kneehill Regional FCSS Community Discovery Night 46/18 Reeve Wittstock moved to authorize the attendance of Councillors wishing to attend the Kneehill Area Community Discovery Nights 2018. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY COUNCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 13, 2018 3 _________ Initials 8.4 Strategic Priorities Chart 47/18 Reeve Wittstock moved that Council approves the 2018-2021Strategic Priorities Chart. AMENDED MOTION 50/18 48/18 Councillor Christie moved to amend the motion to have the Rural Fire Strategy timeline moved from March 2018 to June 2018 in the Strategic Priorities Chart. DEFEATED 49/18 Deputy Reeve King moved to amend the motion to move the Wimborne Hamlet Strategy from the “Later Column” to “Next Column” and rename it Hamlet Strategy. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 50/18 Original Motion 47/18 Reeve Wittstock moved that Council approves the 2018-2021 Strategic Priorities Chart with the amendment from motion 49/18. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 8.5 Centralized Assessment-Hybrid Contract 51/18 Reeve Wittstock moved that Council directs Administration to enter into the hybrid model contract with the Province of Alberta in regards to Designated Industrial Properties Assessment CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY The Chair called for a recess at 9:42 a.m. and called the meeting back to order at 9:48 a.m. with all previously mentioned members present. When the meeting reconvened Sgt. Gabe Graham, Mark Grunert, Neil Weins and Stephen Raymer were present. DELEGATIONS 3.0 Delegations 3.1 Sgt. Gabe Graham, Three Hills RCMP Sgt. Graham presented to Council statistics for the Three Hills RCMP Detachment and a request to have the Kneehill County Peace Officers to attend the Community Action Committee. Sgt. Graham left the meeting at 10:05 a.m. 3.2 GFL Compost Facility, Mark Grunert Mark Grunert and Neil Weins from GFL Compost Facility provided Council with an update on the odour concerns from that facility. Mark Grunert and Neil Weins left the meeting at 10:33 a.m. COUNCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 13, 2018 4 _________ Initials 3.3 AgriTek Humanitar, Stephen Raymer Stephen Raymer presented to Council the idea to create a closed-loop system of Energy-Food-Water production. The Chair called for a recess at 10:50 a.m. and called the meeting back to order at 11:02 a.m. with all previously mentioned members present. Stephen Raymer not present when the meeting reconvened. NEW BUSINESS 8.0 New Business Cont’d 8.6 Community Futures Petition 52/18 Councillor Christie moved that Council approve to signing of the Community Futures Petition. CARRIED COUNCIL REPORTS 10.0 Council and Committee Reports 10.1 Kneehill Regional Family & Community Support Services- Unapproved minutes were provided from the January 9, 2018 meeting. 10.2 Red Deer River Municipal Users Group – Highlights of the Red Deer River Municipal Users Group meeting from January 18, 2018 were provided. 10.3 Drumheller RCMP Provincial Statistics- Drumheller RCMP Detachment statistics from January 2013-2017 were provided. 53/18 Councillor Keiver moved that Council receive the Council and Committee reports as presented. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY COUNCIL ACT LIST 11.0 Council Follow-Up Action List 54/18 Reeve Wittstock moved that Council receive the February 13, 2018 Council Follow-Up Action List as presented for information. CARRIED IN-CAMERA 12.0 In-Camera 55/18 Deputy Reeve King moved that Council go into closed session to discuss Legal matters as per section 20, FOIP at 11:13 a.m. CARRIED 56/18 Councillor Hugo moved that Council return to an open meeting at 12:09 p.m. CARRIED COUNCIL MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 13, 2018 5 _________ Initials 12:09 p.m. – meeting recessed to allow return of public. 12:09 p.m. - meeting resumed, no public present. ADJOURNMENT Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 12:10 p.m. ________________________ Ken King Deputy Reeve _______________________ Al Hoggan CAO Document Last Updated April 15, 2014    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  5.1    SUBJECT:    Bank Reconciliation – November and January 2017   MEETING DATE:    2018-02-27   PRESENTED BY:    Mike Morton, Director of Corporate Services   BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    To request Council’s acceptance of the November and December 2017 Bank Reconciliation.   DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    The Bank Reconciliation has been completed for the period indicated. A total of $30,000,000 has been invested into 5 GIC’s starting November 14, 2017 to August 11, 2018. Interest rates range from 1.81 to 1.91%. Total earned interest at maturity is $282,863.02. Details as per Bank Reconciliation.   COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    N/A   COMMUNICATIONS:    N/A   LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN:    N/A   ATTACHMENTS:    November and December 2017 Bank Reconciliation.   RECOMMENDED ACTION:    Council accepts the November and December 2017 Bank Reconciliation as information.   COUNCIL OPTIONS:    1. Receive the November and December 2017 Bank Reconciliation as information. 2. Council provides further direction.   MOTION:      That Council receives for information the November and December 2017 Bank Reconciliation.      Prepared By: Will Wolfe Approved By: Mike Morton Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Manager of Financial Services Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer   12-000-00-31200 12-000-00-33210 12-000-00-34700 GENERAL ACCT GICs TAX TRUST TOTALS BANK End of Month Balance 44,669,230.47 5,004,186.30 34,760.91 ADD:Outstanding Deposits 80,948.81 Outstanding Adjustments SUBTOTAL 44,750,179.28 5,004,186.30 34,760.91 LESS:Outstanding Cheques 586,657.26 Outstanding Adjustment SUBTOTAL 586,657.26 0.00 0.00 RECONCILED BANK BALANCE 44,163,522.02$ 5,004,186.30$ 34,760.91$ 49,202,469.23$ GL BALANCE 44,163,522.02$ 5,004,186.30$ 34,760.91$ 30/Nov/16 $41,521,481.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 GIC Issuer Term Length Term Days Amount Rate Maturity Value #10 Servus Credit Union Nov 14, 2017 to Aug 11, 2018 270.00 5,000,000.00 1.91%5,070,643.84 5,000,000.00 5,070,643.84 BANK RECONCILIATION November 2017 GIC DETAIL 12-000-00-31200 12-000-00-33210 12-000-00-34700 GENERAL ACCT GICs TAX TRUST TOTALS BANK End of Month Balance 16,556,960.96 30,042,576.71 34,803.72 ADD:Outstanding Deposits 459,680.64 Outstanding Adjustments SUBTOTAL 17,016,641.60 30,042,576.71 34,803.72 LESS:Outstanding Cheques 525,879.86 Outstanding Adjustment SUBTOTAL 525,879.86 0.00 0.00 RECONCILED BANK BALANCE 16,490,761.74$ 30,042,576.71$ 34,803.72$ 46,568,142.17$ GL BALANCE 16,490,761.74$ 30,042,576.71$ 34,803.72$ 31/Dec/16 $38,552,613.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 GIC Issuer Term Length Term Days Amount Rate Maturity Value #10 Servus Credit Union Nov 14, 2017 to Aug 11, 2018 270.00 5,000,000.00 1.91%5,070,643.84 #11 Servus Credit Union Dec 7, 2017 to Apr 6, 2018 120.00 5,000,000.00 1.81%5,029,753.42 #12 Servus Credit Union Dec 7, 2017 to June 5, 2018 180.00 5,000,000.00 1.85%5,045,616.44 #13 Servus Credit Union Dec 7, 2017 to June 5, 2018 180.00 5,000,000.00 1.85%5,045,616.44 #14 Servus Credit Union Dec 7, 2017 to June 5, 2018 180.00 5,000,000.00 1.85%5,045,616.44 #15 Servus Credit Union Dec 7, 2017 to June 5, 2018 180.00 5,000,000.00 1.85%5,045,616.44 30,000,000.00 30,282,863.02 BANK RECONCILIATION December 2017 GIC DETAIL Document Last Updated April 15, 2014    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  5.2    SUBJECT:    Financial Policy 16-12: County Credit, Debit, and Fuel Cards   MEETING DATE:    2018-02-13   PRESENTED BY:    Mike Morton, Director of Corporate Services   BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    A review of the current policy identified there is an unutilized corporate credit card. DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    January was a month of heavy utilization in terms of booking future and attending current conferences and workshops for the Director of Municipal Services, for which many department’s reports to. After reviewing usage of that particular card, it was apparent that the Manager of Parks and Agricultural Services was the Manager that used the Director card the most, primarily due to conference commitments and administering responsibilities with the Agricultural Services Board. The proposed change is simply approving a card for the position of Manager of Parks & Agricultural Services and deleting the card for the vacant Economic Development Officer. The overall corporate limit would stay intact. The policy is attached. COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    None. COMMUNICATIONS:    N/A LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN:    N/A ATTACHMENTS:    County Credit, Debit, and Fuel Cards Policy 16-12 RECOMMENDED ACTION:    That Council approve County Credit, Debit, and Fuel Cards Policy 16-12   COUNCIL OPTIONS:  1. Approve County Credit, Debit, and Fuel Cards Policy 16-12 2. Accept as information MOTION:    Council approves approve County Credit, Debit, and Fuel Cards Policy 16-12           Prepared By: Mike Morton Approved By: Mike Morton Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Director of Corporate Services Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer       POLICY Section Policy No. Page Financial 16‐12 1 of 3    Policy Title Date: Resolution  No.  County Credit, Debit and Fuel Cards February 13, 2018     Purpose:  To establish a policy and procedures for the acquisition and use of credit cards and debit cards in the name of  the Kneehill County for Authorized Holders.    Objective:  To set out reasonable and responsible parameters for the use of Kneehill County credit, debit and fuel cards and  to ensure users are aware of the privileges and duty of care associated with such use.    Policy Statement:  The Council recognizes the importance of providing controls to ensure all financial transactions are properly  accounted for and administered in a timely manner to reduce liability exposure to Kneehill County and  Authorized Holders of County credit cards and debit cards.  Definitions:  Authorized Holder means any person who holds the position of Reeve, Chief Administrative Officer  (CAO), or any Director and includes any other person authorized by the CAO or Operations Director,  Directors, or Senior Manager of Transportation and Facilities for the use of fuel cards.      Card means a credit card, debit card or fuel card.    County means Kneehill County, a municipal corporation in the Province of Alberta.      Credit Card means any card issued by a financial institution, bank or corporation to the County for any  Authorized Holder, authorizing the holder to buy goods or services on credit on behalf of the County.      Debit Card means any card issued by a financial institution or bank to the County for any Authorized  Holder, authorizing the holder to buy goods or services by electronic withdrawal of funds on deposit in  a bank on behalf of the County.      Goods and Services means any goods or services which would normally be required by the Authorized  Holder as part of normal County operations as approved within the annual County Budget, but does  not include cash withdrawals.    Procedures:  1. The total corporate Council approved limit is $40,000. The following positions will be eligible as  Authorized Holders  of a County card for payment or charge of legitimately budgeted items with the  following limits:         POLICY Section Policy No. Page Financial 16‐12 2 of 3    Policy Title Date: Resolution  No.  County Credit, Debit and Fuel Cards February 13, 2018     Card Type Department Position Limit  Credit/Debit Card Legislative Reeve   $2,500.00  Administration   CAO $10,000.00    Director of Municipal  Services  $8,000.00   Director of Corporate  Services  Executive Assistant  Economic Development  Officer  $5,500.00 $5,500.00  $2,500.00        Operations Senior Manager of  Transportation and  Facilities  Manager of Parks &  Agricultural Services    $6,000.00 $2,500.00 Fuel Cards Administration CAO, Director of Municipal  Services, Senior Manager  of Transportation and  Facilities, Director of  Corporate Services   Per Corporate Agreement   2. The charge or purchase of personal expenses, alcoholic beverages or any item or event not related to  County duties or employment is not allowed.  3. Authorized Holders will be responsible to:   a. safeguard any card issued to them by the County from use by unauthorized individuals;  b. abide by the terms and conditions of this policy and procedures and any agreement required by  a financial institution, bank or corporation for a card;    c. turn credit slips and debit slips, along with an appropriate vendor invoice, complete with GST  number, into the Accounts Payable Clerk after the expense is incurred if it was local or upon  return from a workshop, conference or convention.  d. review and sign any agreements required by the County or a financial institution, bank or  corporation for the card;   e. provide any personal information as required by a financial institution, bank or corporation,  within the limits of any Provincial or Federal law which may apply, for the card;  f. forfeit the card upon:  i) suspension or termination of employment with the County  ii) failure to adhere to the terms and conditions of use of a County card.     POLICY Section Policy No. Page Financial 16‐12 3 of 3    Policy Title Date: Resolution  No.  County Credit, Debit and Fuel Cards February 13, 2018     4.  The CAO, or designate, will cause an investigation upon any allegation of inappropriate expenditure or   charge.  Use of the card is considered a privilege and all Authorized Holders will respect the fact the   card provides access to public funds.   The Council, CAO, or designate, may take any of the following   actions in the event any expenditure is found to be inappropriate:   g. issue a warning and seek reimbursement;  h.  suspend or terminate employment;  i.  proceed with legal action in a court of jurisdiction;  j. recall the card.        Al Hoggan  CAO  Jerry Wittstock  Reeve      Approved: March 30, 2006  138/06  Amended: May 11, 2010  231/10  Amended: August 20, 2013 373/13  Review Date: August 2016  Document Last Updated April 15, 2014    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  5.3    SUBJECT:    Reserve Reallocation   MEETING DATE:    2018-02-27 PRESENTED BY: Mike Morton, Director of Corporate Services BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    Kneehill County Council at the recent Strategic Planning Session determined to make several changes to long term strategies. Among those strategic plans were to reallocate certain Council Reserves. As per Financial Policy 16-1, policy guideline 1 states that Council may make reserve transfers by way of Council motion. At the 2018 Strategic Planning Session, Council also made future water expansion as a strategic priority.   DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    1) Rural Internet Reserve – current balance = $1,301,528.04. Council determined that these reserve funds could be better prioritized to other capital projects. This was direction from the 2018 Strategic Planning Sessions. 2) Revenue Stabilization – current balance $2,590,000.00. This reserve was established from 2016 Year End process whereby there was a motion to establish this reserve and to transfer $2.59 million into the newly established reserve, when it was anticipated that the very early preliminary assessment for 2018 was going to decline significantly. Only after the interim budget was passed in December 2017 was the County aware assessment was not going to decline to that anticipated level. Those funds could then be allocated to other capital projects related to the reserve to which it could be transferred. COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:  None. ENGAGEMENT: Council Notes, Website, Social Media LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN: Fiscal Sustainability ATTACHMENTS: Policy 16-1, 2018 Strategic Chart, current and proposed Reserve Balances spreadsheet. RECOMMENDED ACTION:    That Council transfer $1,301,528.04 from Rural Internet Reserve and $2,590,000.00 from Revenue Stabilization Reserve to Water Reserve. COUNCIL OPTIONS: 1. Council transfer $1,301,528.04 from Rural Internet Reserve and/or $2,590,000.00 from Revenue Stabilization Reserve to Water Reserve. 2. Receive as information MOTION: That Council directs Administration to transfer the remaining balance in the Rural Internet reserve of $1,301,528.04 and $2,590,000.00 from the Revenue Stabilization Reserve to the Water Reserve.        Prepared By: Mike Morton Approved By: Mike Morton Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Director of Corporate Services Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer   Kneehill County Reserves Continuity As of As of As of 2017 Budget Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Budget Budget Budget Actual Actual Actual Decrease Increase Balance Decrease Increase Balance IT Reserve 218,419.87- 218,419.87- TOTAL 100,300.00 131,233.00 249,352.87- 83,047.69 131,233.00 266,605.18- Strat Plan 330,652.26- 330,652.26- TOTAL 71,072.56 - 259,579.70- 17,190.00 - 313,462.26- Special Projects 1,726,868.06- 1,726,868.06- TOTAL 857,761.92 55,000.00 924,106.14- 314,696.21 55,000.00 1,467,171.85- Capital Equipment Replacement 3,640,120.08- 3,640,120.08- TOTAL 1,952,100.00 2,391,595.63 4,079,615.71- 1,839,048.13 2,052,515.79 3,853,587.74- Buildings - - TOTAL - - - - - - Emergency Disaster - - TOTAL - - - - - - Fuel Stabilization 312,765.90- 312,765.90- TOTAL - - 312,765.90- - - 312,765.90- Gravel 1,678,045.58- 1,678,045.58- TOTAL - 400,000.00 2,078,045.58- - 425,000.00 2,103,045.58- 1 Kneehill County Reserves Continuity As of As of As of 2017 Budget Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Budget Budget Budget Actual Actual Actual Decrease Increase Balance Decrease Increase Balance Roads 8,199,403.50- 8,199,403.50- TOTAL 2,965,000.00 562,500.00 5,796,903.50- 46,163.50 562,500.00 8,715,740.00- Bridges 4,978,694.56- 4,978,694.56- TOTAL - - 4,978,694.56- - - 4,978,694.56- Water 3,587,107.29- 3,587,107.29- TOTAL 623,217.35 - 2,963,889.94- - - 3,587,107.29- Water Service Area 2,955,004.39- 2,955,004.39- TOTAL - 1,418,108.94 4,373,113.33- - 1,418,108.94 4,373,113.33- Environmental 322,975.99- 322,975.99- TOTAL - - 322,975.99- - - 322,975.99- FCSS 85,162.40- 85,162.40- TOTAL 20,350.00 - 64,812.40- - - 85,162.40- Parent Link 127.41- 127.41- TOTAL - - 127.41- - - 127.41- KCRP 130,029.99- 130,029.99- TOTAL 5,603.00 - 124,426.99- 1,314.22 - 128,715.77- 2 Kneehill County Reserves Continuity As of As of As of 2017 Budget Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Budget Budget Budget Actual Actual Actual Decrease Increase Balance Decrease Increase Balance Medical 250,000.00- 250,000.00- TOTAL 250,000.00 - - - - 250,000.00- Cemeteries 36,421.56- 36,421.56- TOTAL 33,771.99 - 2,649.57- 14,439.30 - 21,982.26- Municipal Reserve 113,361.48- 113,361.48- TOTAL - - 113,361.48- - 4,015.89 117,377.37- Parks 25,952.87- 25,952.87- TOTAL 13,253.72 - 12,699.15- 13,238.16 - 12,714.71- Recreation and Leisure 38,728.00- 38,728.00- TOTAL - - 38,728.00- - - 38,728.00- Contingency Reserve 2,446,740.40- 2,446,740.40- TOTAL 34,660.00 292,937.63 2,705,018.03- 14,314.00 292,937.63 2,725,364.03- Joint Community Summit 32,422.92- 32,422.92- TOTAL - - 32,422.92- - - 32,422.92- Doctor Recruitment 169,557.65- 169,557.65- TOTAL - 50,000.00 219,557.65- 1,178.20 - 168,379.45- 3 Kneehill County Reserves Continuity As of As of As of 2017 Budget Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Sept 30, 2017 Budget Budget Budget Actual Actual Actual Decrease Increase Balance Decrease Increase Balance Urban Sustainability 1,268,392.32- 1,268,392.32- TOTAL - - 1,268,392.32- - - 1,268,392.32- Hamlet Infrastructure 300,000.00- 300,000.00- TOTAL - 100,000.00 400,000.00- - 100,000.00 400,000.00- Revenue Stabilization Reserve 2,590,000.00- 2,590,000.00- TOTAL - - 2,590,000.00- - - 2,590,000.00- Rural Internet Reserve - - TOTAL - 1,301,528.04 1,301,528.04- - 1,301,528.04 1,301,528.04- TOTAL OF ALL RESERVES Dec 31 2016 35,436,954.48- 35,436,954.48- TOTAL OF ALL RESERVES Dec 31 2017 6,927,090.54 6,702,903.24 35,212,767.18- 2,344,629.41 6,342,839.29 39,435,164.36- NET CHANGE IN RESERVES 224,187.30- 3,998,209.88 4 STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART February 2018 CORPORATE PRIORITIES (Council/CAO)  NOW TIMELINE  1. CHURCHILL WATER LINE: Council Direction Feb.  2. 2018 BUDGET: Scenarios  April  3. RURAL FIRE STRATEGY: Position Proposal  March  4. COMMUNITY PEACE OFFICER: Position Proposal  March  5. USER FEE REVIEW: Targeted Services Feb.  NEXT   INTER‐MUN. COLLABORATION FRAMEWORKS   ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY   TOURISM & RECREATION MASTER PLAN:  Review   INTER‐MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS (IDP)  HAMLET STRATEGY    ADVOCACY   Three Hills Water   GFL: Aerator Evaluation   Regional Partnership Forum   Trochu Senior Housing   Doctor Recruitment & Retention: Support    LATER  ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN   LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN   MDP/LUB: Review    INDUSTRIAL AREA: Zoning   THREE HILLS EAST WATER: Options   INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING STRATEGY   HUMAN RESOURCE POLICY   RURAL FIRE SERVICE STRATEGY   COMMUNITY STANDARDS BYLAW: Update   YOUTH SPONSORSHIP: Policy Review  OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES (CAO/STAFF)  CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER  1. CPO: Position Proposal – Mar.  2. ICF Program: Approach – Mar.  3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY: ToR – Apr.   YOUTH SPONSORSHIP: Policy Review    Regional Partnership Forum  CORPORATE 1. 2018 BUDGET: Scenarios – April   2. HUMAN RESOURCE POLICY: Update – Mar.  3. USER FEE REVIEW: Targeted Services – Mar.   LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN   ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN  PROTECTIVE SERVICES   1. RURAL FIRE STRATEGY: Position Proposal – Mar.  2. COMMUNITY STANDARDS BYLAW: Update  3. OH & S: Legislative Compliance ‐ May   RURAL FIRE SERVICE STRATEGY     PLANNING 1. IDP: Completion – May  2. MDP/LUB: Review ‐ June  3. INDUSTRIAL AREA: Zoning – June    HAMLET STRATEGY      TRANSPORTATION & ENVIRONMENT 1. CHURCHILL WATER LINE: Council Direction – Feb.  2.  HAMLET STRATEGY – Sept.  3. SOLID WASTE STRAEGY – Sept.    THREE HILLS EAST WATER: Options    AGRICULTURE & PARKS  1. TOURISM & RECREATION MASTER PLAN: Review –  Apr.  2. HORSESHOE CANYON ENHANCEMENTS – Aug.        CODES: BOLD CAPITALS = NOW Priorities; CAPITALS = NEXT Priorities; Italics = Advocacy; Regular Title Case = Operational Strategies   Document Last Updated April 15, 2014    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  5.4    SUBJECT:    Policy #16-2, Accounts Receivable Collection Process   MEETING DATE:    2018-02-27   PRESENTED BY:    Mike Morton, Director of Corporate Services   BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    Administration is reviewing policies that were last approved by Council that are three years and older.   DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    The changes are noted in red on the attached policy document. Improvements were made to policy by adding stronger definitions and better clarification that better outlines the intent of the actual procedures Administration follows. Notes: Better definition of Account Receivable by adding “not being paid at the point of sale”. Policy Guideline 3 - Better defining when penalties apply and when there is a rare exemption from penalties. (Typically granted when another agreement takes precedent) Policy Guidelines 5, 6, and 7 are progressive collection letters which are a more practical process and components of the old policy sections 6 and 7 are now rolled into current section 8 to allow a better practical flow. Policy Guideline 8 is now the punitive stage at the Administrative level and procedures outlined the same as the old policy (#7 of old policy) New Policy Guideline 9 is now separate and indicate the last stage of the collection process where the CAO and Council become involved (#7 of old policy). New guidelines 8 and 9 were all part of guideline 7 of the old policy which you can see are now separate. This makes it much more practical. Policy guidelines 10-12 include a timeframe and a title change.   COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    Policy changes will not affect penalty revenue.   COMMUNICATIONS:    N/A   LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN:    Fiscal Sustainability   ATTACHMENTS:    Accounts Receivable Collection Process Policy 16-2 Collection Letters 1-3 REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item # 5.4 2 | Page    RECOMMENDED ACTION:    That Council approve Accounts Receivable Collection Process Policy 16-2     COUNCIL OPTIONS:  1. Approve Accounts Receivable Collection Process Policy 16-2 2. Accept as information     MOTION:      That Council approves as presented Policy #16‐2, Accounts Receivable  Collection Process.         Prepared By: Mike Morton Approved By: Mike Morton Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Director of Corporate Services Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer       POLICY Section Policy No. Page Financial 16‐2 1 of 2    Policy Title Date: Resolution  No.  Accounts Receivable Collection Process February 27, 2018       Purpose:  To establish uniform guidelines for the collection of accounts receivable.  The County shall promote and  encourage the timely payment of accounts receivable and pursue delinquent accounts in a prudent and diligent  manner.    Policy Definitions:  Accounts Receivable:  An amount owed to Kneehill County that is not being paid immediately at the point of  sale, other than utilities or property taxes.      Policy Guidelines:  1. All invoices are prepared by the Accounts Receivable Clerk and will be reviewed to ensure that they  are complete. Name, address, and contact information has to be provided from the invoicing source or  department at a minimum.  2. Submitted request to invoice that are incomplete will be returned to the originator or clarification will  be obtained by phone.   3. An interest penalty of 1.5% per month will be added to invoices past due 30 days as per Master Rates  By‐Law will be added to outstanding amounts over thirty days.  Penalty only applicable to invoices as  determined by the accounting supervisors discretion. All invoices will be subject to penalties, with rare  exception where it forms part of another agreement i.e. cost sharing where Director approves  exemption. In rare exceptions, there may be cases where there may be exemptions as part of another  agreement (Roadata, cost sharing with another municipality, etc), the CAO or Director, may approve  the exemption of penalties.  4. All accounts with a balance owing will be issued a monthly customer statement.  After 30 days letter  #1 will be sent at the Accounts Receivable Clerk's discretion.  5. Upon 30 days overdue letter #1 will be mailed as a reminder to the customer.    An invoice unpaid after  60 days requires letter #2.  6. Upon 60 days overdue letter #2 will be mailed as a second reminder to the customer.  An invoice  unpaid after from 90 days. requires telephone contact and letter #3 or #4 (transfer to taxes) will be  sent by registered mail.  AR clerk shall by email advise department head, director and originator of  invoice about account status and the service may be restricted.  7. Upon 90 days overdue letter #3 will be mailed as a warning to the customer.    An invoice unpaid after  120 days. and after procedures 1 to 6 have been completed requires review by the CAO.  Appropriate  letters based on the CAO’s decision will be written as in letter #5.  Options available at the discretion  by the CAO but are not restricted to one option:  i. Account will be referred to the collection agency.  ii. Court actions will be authorized for any account deemed appropriate by the CAO.   iii. Account will be written off (with authorization of Council).  iv. Other appropriate options.     POLICY Section Policy No. Page Financial 16‐2 2 of 2    Policy Title Date: Resolution  No.  Accounts Receivable Collection Process February 27, 2018         8. If an invoice is overdue by 120 days, and after procedures 1 to 7 have been completed, a full account  review by the Director of Corporate Services will be conducted.  Options available at the discretion by  the Director of Corporate Services, but are not restricted to one option:  i. Account will be referred to the collection agency.  ii. Account will be transferred to taxes if applicable (MGA Section 553(1))  iii. The department from which the good or service provided to the customer (who’s account  is now 120 overdue) will be notified and further goods or services requested, may be  restricted until paid.  9. At any point after account is overdue by 120 days, the CAO may:  v. Authorize court actions for any account deemed appropriate.   vi. Write off the account (with authorization of Council).  vii. Other appropriate options available as feasible.  10. At least annually, accounts that have been referred to a collection agency and still prove to be  uncollectable shall be written off one year after they have been referred to the collection agency, and  if not already been done so in 7(c), will be written off through the approval of Council.  Should the  account be collected within the seven‐year period the file remains active, the collected amount will be  applied to a general collection or recovery account.  11. The account holder will continue to be on the restricted services delinquent list until either the account  is paid up or the expiry of the seven‐year active collection period.  The CAO may exercise judgment  contrary to this if deemed appropriate.  12. An account balance of less than $10.00 at month end can be written off at the accounting supervisor’s  Manager of Financial Services’ discretion. The basis will be if it is cost effective to do or as a result of  timing differences.               Al Hoggan,  CAO   Jerry Wittstock  Reeve      Approved: January 22, 2001 606/06  Amended: August 26, 2008 397/08  Amended: November 29, 2011 570/11  Review Date: November 29, 2014  Collection Letter #1 Date DOE, JOHN DOE, JOHN BOX 1234 ANYWHERE, AB A1A 1A1 RE: OVERDUE ACCOUNT Dear DOE, JOHN, Just a reminder that you have an over 30 days past due invoice(s) with a balance of $100.00. Total due is $101.50 including finance charge. We would be happy to discuss any questions you may have regarding this subject. If payment has already been sent, please disregard this reminder. We accept payment by credit card, online through most financial institutions, cash or cheque. We appreciate your business, and we look forward to hearing from you soon. Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Hall Accounts Receivable Clerk (403) 443-5541 ext 206 (403) 443-5515 elizabeth.hall@kneehillcounty.com Collection Letter #2 Date DOE, JOHN DOE, JOHN BOX 1234 ANYWHERE, AB A1A 1A1 RE: OVERDUE ACCOUNT Dear DOE, JOHN, We have previously contacted you about the outstanding invoice(s) on your account, and we have not received a response from you. Your account has an over 60 days past due balance of $100.00. Total due is $105.00 including finance charges. The following invoice(s) are past due: Document # Date Terms Due Date Amount Due IVC0009999 4/30/2017 Net 30 5/30/2017 $100.00 Please call the undersigned immediately to discuss your account or to let us know that you have sent your payment. Thank you for your prompt response to this matter. We accept payment by credit card, online through most financial institutions, cash or cheque. Sincerely, Will Wolfe Manager of Financial Services (403) 443-5541 (403) 443-5515 will.wolfe@kneehillcounty.com /eh Collection Letter #3 Date DOE, JOHN DOE, JOHN BOX 1234 ANYWHERE, AB A1A 1A1 RE: OVERDUE ACCOUNT Dear DOE, JOHN, Please contact us immediately regarding your over 90 days past due invoice(s). Your account will be turned over to a collection agency if payment arrangements are not made within seven days. This will have a negative effect on your credit rating. Please send your payment in full or contact the undersigned to make payment arrangements. We will be required to take further action if you do not contact us regarding your account. We accept payment by credit card, online through most financial institutions, cash or cheque. Sincerely, Mike Morton Director Corporate Services (403) 443-5541 (403) 443-5515 mike.morton@kneehillcounty.com /eh Document Last Updated April 15, 2014    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  5.5    SUBJECT:    User Fee Review   MEETING DATE:    2018-02-27   PRESENTED BY:    Mike Morton, Director of Corporate Services   BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    Review Kneehill County services and User Fees   DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    As per the Feb 13, 2018 Council meeting discussion regarding Strategic Initiatives. Council directed administration to provide an overall review of services offered and the level of cost recovery for these services. This report shows a high level estimate of cost recovery put together with Operation Managers. Additional financial analysis may be required on some of these services to bring out greater detail and accuracy.   COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    N/A   COMMUNICATIONS:    N/A   LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN:    Fiscal Sustainability   ATTACHMENTS:    User Fee Review Report   RECOMMENDED ACTION:    That Council accept the User Fee Review Report as information     COUNCIL OPTIONS:  1. Receive the User Fee Review Report as information. 2. Council provides further direction.   MOTION:    1. Receive the User Fee Review Report as information.      Prepared By: Will Wolfe Approved By: Mike Morton Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Manager of Financial Services Director of Corporate Services Chief Administrative Officer   ADMINISTRATION Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Arial Photos No 0% 100% Arial Photos Geo-Referenced Photos No 0% 100% Description Fee Kneehill County Maps Yes 0% 100% Land Owners No Fee Custom Plotter (Scanned) No 0% 100% Others $0.25 each Fax Charges No 0% 100% Geo-Referenced Photos Photocopies No 0% 100% Description Fee Flags Set up fee & first 1/4 50.00 NSF Returned Cheque No 55% 45% Additional quarters 25.00 Tax Certificates Yes 0% 100% Kneehill County Maps Tax Registration Yes 75% 25% Description Fee Assessment Sheets Yes 60% 40% 24 inch - regular $10.00 each Well Drilling Equipment Tax Yes N/A N/A 32 inch - regular $15.00 each Assessment Appeal Fees 32 inch - laminated $35.00 each FOIP Services 33% 67% 42 inch - regular $20.00 each 42 inch - laminated $40.00 each 60 inch - regular $30.00 each On CD $10.00 each Map Book $25.00 each Mailing Tube $10.00 each Shipping Charges $10.00 each Custom Plotter (Scanned) Description Fee 24 inch $50.00 each 32 inch $75.00 each 42 inch $100.00 each 60 inch $150.00 each Map scanned and put on CD $75.00 each Fax Charges Description Fee Alberta(Local) $0.50 per page Out of province $1 per page Flags Description Fee County $70 each Photocopies Description Fee Ratepayers/Non- staff $0.50 per page Staff $0.10 per page Late Penalty Charges Description Fee Account Receivable Billings 1.5% per month NSF Returned Cheque Description Fee NSF Returned Cheque $30.00 each Tax Certificates Description Fee Tax Certificate $20.00 each Tax Registration $100.00/file Well Drilling Equipment Tax Description Fee As per Municipal Government Act http://www.qp.alberta.ca Assessment Sheets Description Fee Assessment Summary or Detail Sheet (Free to Landowner) $5.00 each Additional pages $1.00 each Appeal Fees Description Fee Residential & Farm (Refundable if Successful) $50.00 each Non-Residential (Refundable if Successful): Assessment Value of $1.00 to $500,000 $100.00 each Assessment value of $500,001 to $5,000,000 $200.00 each Assessment value of $5,000,001 and above $500.00 each Reports/Details/Photocopies $5.00 each Election Description Fee Nomination Paper Filing Fee 100.00 FOIP Services Description Fee Searching for, locating and retrieving a record $7.50 per 1/4 hour Producing a copy of a record: i) Paper copies $0.50 per page ii) Electronic copies (i.e. USB) Cost iii) Large Format (i.e. maps) Cost Preparing and handling a record for disclosure $7.50 per 1/4 hour Supervising the examination of a record $7.50 per 1/4 hour Shipping a record or a copy of a record Cost AG SERVICES Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery ASB or Environ mental Grant Funded AGRICULTURAL SERVICE BOARD Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Rental Equipment No 70% 30% ASB Rental Equipment Weed Inspections Rural Yes 77% 23% Description Fee Weed Inspections Urban Yes 100% Cattle Scale (Free to 4-H) $100.00 per day min. Weed Control Public Lands Yes 77% 23% Brillion Grass Seeder $175.00 per day min. Weed Control Private Lands No 100% Hayland / Pasture Float $225.00 per day min. Weed Control Enforcement Private Lands Yes 100%No Till Drill - 15' $17/acre $300 per day min. Roadside Mowing Yes 77% 23% Pasture Sprayer $150.00 per day min. Roadside Spraying Yes 77% 23% Portable 12" Loading Chute (Free to 4- H) $100.00 per day min. Roadside Shoulder Spraying (Gravel Recovery) No 100%Private Land Weed Control $75.00/acre plus chemicals Pest Control (2% Gopher Poison) No 100% Solar Watering System (First Time Users; Free 2 Week Trial) $150.00 per week min. Environmental Farm Plan No 71% 29% Sprayer Rental $30.00 per day min. Water Well Abandonment No 71% 29% - Handguns (herbicide 80 gal, insecticide 30 gal.) Producer Workshops No 51% 20% 29% Spreaders (skid mount pneumatic, mechanical) $30.00 per day min. Riparian Restoration program No 71% 29% Forage Probe Free- use agreement Newsletters No 71% 29% Hand Crank Spreader Free- use agreement Pest Inspections Yes 77% 23% Livestock Tag Reader Free- use agreement Canola Clubroot Survey No 100% AG. Plastic Recycling Roller $50.00 per day Alberta Ag Pest Surveys No 77% 23% Urban Weed & Pest Inspection Fee $30.00/hr + $0.55/km ASB County Summer Tour No 78% 22% Pasture Land Lease Tendered Mowing for hire No 100% * There will be an additional cleaning fee of $75 for any rental equipment returned unclean subject to Management discretion Gopher Poison 2% Liquid Strychnine Current market price plus 10% Mowing Mowing (per unit per hour) Per Province of Alberta Rates CEMETERY Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery Grant Funded Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Commemorative Bench No 25% 75% Description Fee Resident Cemetery Plot No 50% 50% Commemorative Bench $1500.00 per bench Non- Resident Cemetery Plot No 0% 100% Cemetery Plot (2 plot limit) Cemetery Maintenance Yes 99.999% 0.001% 0% Description Fee Resident, Property Owner, former County resident $350.00 each Non-County Resident-Outside geographic area $1500.00 each Cemetery Maintenance Description Fee Trochu Catholic $200.00 per year Roman Catholic Cemetery $200.00 per year Torrington Trinity Lutheran Cemetery $200.00 per year Trochu St. John’s Lutheran $200.00 per year Parks Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery ASB or Environ mental Grant Funded PARKS Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Parks Maintenance No 100% Description Fee Public Lands & Parks Mowing No 100% Braconnier Campground Fees Horseshoe Canyon No 93% 7% Tenting per night 15.00 Keivers Lake Campground No 35% 65% RV/Trailer per night 20.00 Swalwell Dam Campground No 91% 9% Torrington Campground Fees Braconnier Campground No 87% 13% Tenting per night 15.00 Torrington Campground No 97% 3% RV/Trailer per night 20.00 Swalwell Campground Fees Tenting per night 15.00 RV/Trailer per night 20.00 Keiver’s Lake Campground Fees Tenting per unit per night (non- reservable stalls)20.00 Un-serviced sites per unit per night (non-reservable stalls)25.00 Serviced Sites per unit per night (non- reservable)30.00 Serviced Site (reservable)30.00 Group Site- RV/Trailer Group per night (minimum of 4 @ $25/unit per night)25.00 Reservation Deposit for RV Group Site(minimum of 4 units @ $25/unit per night)100.00 Group Site- Tents per night (minimum of 4 units @ $20/unit per night)20.00 Reservation Deposit for Tent Group Site (minimum of 4 @ $20/unit per night)80.00 Changes to campsite reservations (no charge for address/name changes-non refundable)5.00 Reservation for Day Use Area (not including playground area)50.00 * Prepayments and deposits only refunded with 72 hours’ notice. Firewood Description Fee Firewood per bundle 5.00 TRANSPORATATION Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Approach/Crossing Description Fee assuming same as charged for commercial 100% Approach/Crossing Residential/Farm No Fee Application Fees Application Fees two inspections for commercial only 100% Description Fee Commercial: staked $300.00 each Pipeline Crossing Application $300.00 each Grader Grader $209 per hour (AB Road Bldg Rate) No 55% 45% Description Fee Snowplowing Services per half hour $55.00 per half hour Snowplowing Services exceeding ½ hour $95.00 exceeding ½ hour Blading Services (other than snow) $55.00 per half hour Blading Services (other than snow) exceeding ½ hour $95.00 exceeding ½ hour to a maximum of 3 hours/year Remediation Blading Current AB Road Builders Construction Association Rig Moves Rig Moves Road Data Fee 100% Description Fee Rig Moves-Inspection Overweight & Moves $200.00 each Dust Control Dust Control Calcium - 46 applications in 2017 No 50% 50% Description Fee Spec - 0 applications in 2017 No 13% 87% Calcium Chloride $5.35/metre Municipal Partners No 100% Spec Crude $32.50 /metre Road Permit Fixed Fee Road Permit Fixed Fee Description Fee Road Data Fee 100% Road Permit Fixed Fee $20.00 each Road Bonds Road Bonds Description Fee Road Bonds As per Agreement PROTECTIVE SERVICES Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Burn Permit no 0% 0 Description Fee Burn Permit No Fee Inspections for Licensing and Insurance yes 100% 100% Inspections for Licensing and Insurance Description Fee Small Business $75.00 (plus travel @KC rates) Multiple Occupancy $150.00 (plus travel @KC rates) All Other Occupancies $150.00 (plus travel @KC rates) Occupant Load Calculation and Report yes 100% 100% Occupant Load Calculation and Report Description Fee Small Business $75.00 (plus travel @KC rates) Multiple Occupancy $150.00 (plus travel @KC rates) All Other Occupancies $150.00 (plus travel @KC rates) Fireworks yes 0% 0 Fireworks Description Fee Fireworks Discharge Permit No Fee – In Burn Permit Process Fire Investigation Services yes 100% 70% Fire Investigation Services Description Fee Each Safety Codes Officer $75.00 per hour (plus travel @KC rates) Witness Services- Each Safety Codes Officer $100.00 per hour (plus travel @KC rates) Witness - Civil Litigation $100.00 per hour Fire Services Fees no 0% 0 Fire Services Fees Motor Vehicle Collision Rate - Equipment Charges Current AB Infrastructure Rate Per unit Per Hour Fee for Service Recovery – Per Unit Per Hour AB Infrastructure Rates Fee for Service Recovery- Materials Actual Expenses/Costs Mutual Aid Responses- Equipment, Manpower or Other Resources no 0 100% Mutual Aid Responses- Equipment, Manpower or Other Resources Description Fee Mutual Aid Responses- Equipment, Manpower or Other Resources Pursuant to Mutual Aid Agreements Animal Control no 100% 0% Animal Control Kennel Fees no 100% 100% Description Fee Annual License Fee - Unaltered or Altered Dog No Fee each Replacement Tag $2.00 each Impound Fee Cost Boarding Fee Cost Veterinarian Fee Cost Kennel License Fee 100.00 Peace Officer Bylaw Enforcement no 100% 10% Peace Officer Bylaw Enforcement Contracts to other municipalities no 0% 100% Description Fee Peace Officer Bylaw Enforcement As per Agreement Unsightly Properties – Cost of Ordered Clean-Up As per Municipal Government Act Mowing Properties (per unit per hour) Per Province of Alberta Rates SAFETY CODE FEES Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery Master Rate Bylaw 1753 General General Description Fee Minimum Fee (Will be charged if not a specific fee for permit) 100.00 Penalty for no Safety Code Permit Double applicable fee Project Cancelled Prior To Inspections 75% Refund Building Permit Fees yes 100%Building Permit Fees Description Fee New Single Family Dwellings- Floor Area Sq. Ft. $0.40 per sq. ft.- total of main, 2nd and additional floors does not include basement. (Does not include attached garages) Garage - detached/attached Less than 800 sq. ft. 120.00 Garage - detached/attached Greater than 800 sq. ft. 160.00 Mobile/Manufactured Homes includes Move-on and RTM's 100.00 Homes With Basement $0.25/ft2- min $100 Basement Development .20¢/ft² - min $95.00 Additions .40¢/ft² - min $100.00 Decks greater than 2 ft. above grade or 100 ft² $100 flat fee Fire places/Wood Burning Stove 100.00 Small Accessory Building 100 – 200 ft² 90.00 Non-Ag. Building <2500 ft² 250.00 Non-Ag. Building >2500 ft² 500.00 Commercial/Industrial yes 100%Commercial/Industrial Commercial - hotels, warehouses, stores, etc. Industrial - waste transfer buildings, water treatment plants, etc. Description Fee $1 - $1 million project value $5.00 /$1,000 - min $150.00 Over $1 million project value $4.00/$1,000 project value Portion over $1 million project value $4/$1000 Oilfield - compressor stations, dehydrator, separator $5.00/$1000 bldgs., motor control center office/bldg. min. $250.00 max SCC fee $500.00 Demolition Permit - use building permit (not needed if replacing) 95.00 SCC Levy is 4% of the permit fee with a minimum of $4.50 & maximum of $560.00 Electrical-Plumbing-Gas-PSDS Permit Fees- Homeowner Fee Schedule yes 100% Electrical Installations- New Residential Installations Only yes 100%Electrical Installations- New Residential Installations Only Description Fee Less than 1500 sq. ft. 190.00 1501-3000 sq. ft. 215.00 3001-5000 sq. ft. 230.00 5001+ sq. ft. 250.00 with attached garage add $50.00 Detached garage 150.00 Mobile Home Connection 105.00 Temporary Service 90.00 Electrical Installations- Small Electrical Installations- Value of Material yes 100%Electrical Installations- Small Electrical Installations- Value of Mate Description Fee $0 - $250 90.00 $251 - $500 150.00 $501 - $1000 175.00 $1001 - $2000 190.00 $2001 - $3000 210.00 $3001 - $4000 230.00 $4001 - $5000 240.00 $5001 - $6000 250.00 $6001 - $7000 260.00 $7001 - $8000 270.00 $8001 - $9000 280.00 Add $10 fee for every $1000 installation cost over $9000 Electrical-Plumbing-Gas-PSDS Permit Fees- Homeowner Fee Schedule Sewer Systems- Private Sewer Disposal System yes 100%Sewer Systems- Private Sewer Disposal System Description – Homeowner Fees Fee Open Discharge 300.00 Disposal Field 300.00 Treatment Mound 300.00 Septic Tank Only 200.00 Holding Tank 150.00 Plumbing Installations yes 100%Plumbing Installations Description Permit Fee 1-6 fixtures 100.00 7-12 fixtures 175.00 13-20 fixtures 250.00 20+ fixtures $250.00 + $10/fixture over 20 Gas Installations yes 100%Gas Installations Description Permit Fee 1 Outlet 90.00 2 Outlet 90.00 3 Outlet 100.00 4 Outlet 110.00 5 Outlet 120.00 $10 per additional outlet Propane Tank only 75.00 Gas Furnace Replacement- No Permit unless Replacing Meter then 90.00 Gas Fire Place- Permit needed if venting & piping has changed Contractor Fee Schedule Contractor Fee Schedule Electrical Permit Fees Yes 100%Electrical Permit Fees Installation Costs Permit Fee $0-$1000 80.00 $1001 - $2000 100.00 $2001 - $3000 120.00 $3001 - $4000 140.00 $4001 - $5000 160.00 Add $10 fee for every additional $1000 installation cost (Example $1000,000 cost fee= $160=950=$1110.00 Mobile Home Connection 80.00 Temporary Service 70.00 Annual Electric Permit and $10.50 SCC levy on each application 300.00 SCC Levy is 4% of the permit fee with a minimum of $4.50 & maximum of $560.00 Plumbing Installations Yes 100%Plumbing Installations 1-10 fixtures 100.00 11-20 fixtures 150.00 20+ fixtures $150.00 + $5.00/fixture over 20 Gas Installations yes 100%Gas Installations BTU Input Permit Fee 10-150,000 75.00 170-190,000 85.00 210-300,000 95.00 350,000.00 105.00 400,000.00 110.00 450,000.00 115.00 500,000.00 120.00 550,000.00 125.00 600,000.00 130.00 650,000.00 135.00 700,000.00 140.00 750,000.00 145.00 800,000.00 150.00 850,000.00 155.00 900,000.00 160.00 1,000,000.00 165.00 Add $6 /100,000 BTU over 1,000,000 Other Gas Installations yes 100%Other Gas Installations Description Permit Fee Man. Home on Basement 130.00 Man. Home w/o Basement 100.00 Propane Tank Set (new or replacement) 75.00 Temporary 100.00 Gas Line (Gas Provider) 80.00 Gas line Retest 75.00 Alternative Energy yes 100%Alternative Energy Residential Industrial/Commercial Private Sewage Disposal Fees yes 100%Private Sewage Disposal Fees Description Fee Open Discharge (includes tank) 250.00 Disposal Field/Treatment Mound (includes tank) 250.00 Septic Tank Only 150.00 Holding Tank 100.00 SCC Levy is 4% of the permit fee with a minimum of $4.50 & maximum of $560.00 PLANNING Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Master Rate Bylaw 1753 General General Appeal Yes 90% 10% Description Fee ASP 100%Appeal Fees- owners/adjacent $300.00 each Outline Plan 100% ASP - New Specific Proposal $5000.00 each ASP 100%ASP/LUB Amendment /Review $2000.00 each Caveat Discharge 100% Outline/Concept Plan $2000.00 each Rural Address Sign 50% 50% Outline/Concept Plan Amendment $1000.00 each Certificate of Compliance 20% 80% Municipal Development Plan Amendme $2000.00 each Rezoning 100%Inter-municipal Development Plan Ame $2000.00 each Road Closure 100% Caveat Discharge $100.00 each Rural Address Sign $90.00 each Request For File Search (1/2 hr. min.) $50.00 per hour Land Use By-Law $20.00 each Land Use By-Law Maps $25.00 each Municipal Development Plan $15.00 each Area Structure Plan - electronic copy $25.00 each Certificate of Compliance- Residential/F $75.00 each Certificate of Compliance- Non-Residen $100.00 each Rezoning / Re-designation $800.00 each Road Closure Request Application $800.00 each Contravention to Land Use By-Law 1,600.00 Development Permits- Class 1 – Minor Development Development Permits- Class 1 – Minor Development 100%Description Fee Additions to Buildings $75.00 each Porches $75.00 each Fences $20.00 each Signs $75.00 each Accessory Buildings $75.00 each Temporary Buildings $75.00 > 200 sq. ft. each Minor Home Occupation $75.00 each Revision to Active DP (Discretionary use $75.00 each Alternative Energy Residential $50.00 each Unlisted Similar Use $75.00 each Development Permits- Class 2- Residential, Minor Commercial and Change in Land Use Class 2 40% 60% Description Fee Development Permits- Class 2- Residential, Minor Commercial and Change in Land Use Major Home Occupations 150.00 Single Family Dwelling Unit $200.00 Discretionary Duplex (2 dwelling units) $250.00 flat fee Multi-Attached Dwelling (3 or more dw $300.00 flat fee plus $50.00 Maximum $15,000.00 Bed and Breakfast $150.00 plus $50.00/unit Change in use of land or intensity of use, where a permit is required 150.00 Livestock Development Permit 100.00 Agricultural Business Use 200.00 Filming Fee - Minor 200.00 Filming Fee - Major 500.00 Development Permits- Class 3- Institutional, Commercial and Light Industrial Class 3 100%Description Fee Compressor Stations, Oilfield Buildings 400.00 Chemical Storage 400.00 Telecommunication towers 300.00 Single wind turbine 400.00 Kennels 250.00 Fertilizer blending plants 400.00 Grain elevators 400.00 Greenhouse 400.00 Private Schools and churches 400.00 Machinery repair and/or sales 400.00 Restaurants, service stations, hotels, ret 400.00 Unlisted Similar Use 400.00 Development Permits- Class 4- Major Commercial, Industrial and Recreation Class 4 100%Description Fee Sand or gravel extraction $750.00 each Wind Farm Towers $500.00 each Golf Courses $500.00 each Campsites (Campgrounds) $500.00 each Work Camp $500.00 each Alternative Energy $500.00 each Unlisted Similar Use $500.00 each Major Industrial or Processing $1000.00 each Development Permits- Class 5- Exceptions Development Permits- Class 5- Exceptions Class 5 - no fee 100% Description Fee Double permit fee 100% Non-profit public or community building No Fee Public utility buildings No Fee Fee For Development Permit After the F Double Permit Fee Variance/Relaxation to Development Ap 75.00 Development Permits- Class 3- Institutional, Commercial and Light Industrial Development Permits- Class 4- Major Commercial, Industrial and Recreation Subdivision Fees 100% Subdivision Fees Description Fee One Parcel $650.00 for 1st parcel Two Plus Parcels $200.00 Per each additional parcel Time Extensions 250.00 Endorsement Fees 100% Endorsement Fees Description Fee For Each Parcel Created $300.00 For each parcel Engineering Review 100% Legal Fees 100% Compliance 100% Notes to Planning recovery cost: Information does not factor in additional work required after a permit has been issued. Does not include process for planning documents or the administration of day to day enquiries. Does not include compliance issues. WATER Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Service Charges & Installation Service Charges & Installation Extra Meter Installation No 57% 43% Description Fee Meter Installation: More than one meter Meter Cost plus $40.00 Private Meter Accuracy Test No Unknown Unknown Meter Test - accuracy within 98.5% to 101.5% $40.00 per meter Additional Meter Read No 78% 22% Additional Meter Read 20.00 Charge to attend a Premise No 57% 43% Service Charge to Attend a Premise 40.00 After Hours Call No 57% 43% After Hours Call $40.00/hr with 3hr min Disconnection Service Charge No 73% 27% Disconnection Service Charge - Customer Request 25.00 Reconnection Service Charge No 73% 27% Reconnection Service Charge - Customer Request 25.00 Disconnection Service Charge No 73% 27%Disconnection Service Charge - Breach 25.00 Reconnection Service Charge No 73% 27%Reconnection Service Charge - Breach 25.00 Damaged Meter Replacement No 78% 22% Damaged Meter Replacement Meter Cost plus $40.00 Late Payment Penalty Late Payment Penalty 1.50% monthly Temporary Service No 78% 22% Temporary Service Meter Cost plus $40.00 Contractor Operator Call out Rates and Mileage Contractor Operator Call Out Rates and Mileage As per agreement Water Charges & Rates - Department as a whole 57% 43%Water Charges Water Rates only - resale rate at 3.15 per cube, same rate as Aqua 7 cost 0% 100%Description Fee Bulk Water Stations $3.15 per cubic meter Account Administration Reactivation Fee (Bulk Water) 25.00 Base Rate for all Hamlets, WSA's and Co-ops $25.00 per month New Waterline Connections No 6% 94% Riser Fee $6,000.00 per riser Increased Water volume No 0% 100% Approved Increase For Rural Water Volume 6,000.00 Hamlet Utility Connections (was based on missing information. Believe it would be subsidized if all information available) No 0% 100% Hamlet Utility Service For Un-serviced Lots 2,500.00 "Hamlet" means the communities of Huxley, Swalwell, Torrington and Wimborne Water Modeling Water Modeling Adjacent to line No 0% 100% Description Fee Non-adjacent to line 0% 100% Adjacent to Line 750.00 Non-adjacent to line for multiple developments 0% 100%Non-Adjacent to Line 1,000.00 Non-Adjacent to Line for Multiple Developments $1,000.00 per request Water Rates 40% 60%Water Rates Description Fee Base Rate for Hydrant Service/ Maintenance $ 9.75 per month Huxley $ 1.64 per cubic metre Swalwell $3.15 per cubic metre Torrington $3.15 per cubic metre Wimborne $ 1.64 per cubic metre Sunnyslope WSA $3.15 per cubic metre Churchill Water Co-op $3.15 per cubic metre Equity WSA $ 1.64 per cubic metre Gamble WSA $3.15 per cubic metre Grainger/Hesketh $3.15 per cubic metre Kirkpatrick WSA $3.15 per cubic metre Mt. Vernon Co-op $ 1.64 per cubic metre Selkirk WSA $3.15 per cubic metre WASTE WATER Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Sewage Charges Sewage Charges Description Fee Huxley 87% 13% Huxley $2.33 per house/month Swalwell 86% 14% Swalwell $6.12 per house/month Torrington 86% 14% Torrington $3.45 per house/month Wimborne 74% 26%Mobile Home Parks $3.45 per occupied lot/month Wimborne $14.54 per house/month WASTE MANAGEMENT Required as part of Provincial Statutes Approximate Municipal Tax Dollars Subsidized Approximate Cost Recovery Master Rate Bylaw 1753 Garbage Garbage Hamlet Garbage Collection No 100% 0% Description Fee Freon Appliances yes 0% 100% Residents No Charge Acme Transfer Site No 100% 0% Non-Resident Tipping Fee -1/2 Ton Truck $20.00 each Trochu Transfer Site No 100% 0%Non-Resident Tipping Fee -1 Ton Truck $40.00 each Carbon Transfer Site No 85% 15% Non-Resident Tipping Fee- Trailer 8-20 feet $50.00 each Three Hills Transfer Site No 100% 0% Non-Resident Tipping Fee -Loads larger than specified $80.00 each Linden Transfer Site No 60% 40% Torrington Transfer Site No 75% 25% Drumheller Solid Waste Requisition No 100% 0 Freon Appliance $15.00 each Document Last Updated April 15, 2014    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  6.2.1 Amended    SUBJECT:    Churchill Water System   MEETING DATE:    2018-02-27   PRESENTED BY:    John McKiernan   BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    As part of council’s strategic plan the Churchill rural water system was an important component to address. WSP has completed conceptual engineering to 90% to upgrade and improve the Churchill rural water system in 2017. The engineering includes the design layout for the distribution system, pumphouse, reservoir and bulk fill station. The engineering addressed two alternate designs; 1) a system for residential use only and, 2) a system that includes both commercial and residential use.   DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    ‐ Improving the water delivery to the existing users ‐ Expand and make available water service to other residences within the system (a total of 78 identified connections, including existing 37 users) ‐ Will Include a bulk water system located at reservoir/pumphouse ‐ A reservoir/pumphouse will be constructed to provide water storage for the system and fire protection (if commercial accepted) ‐ Size of waterlines will be constructed to offer a full flow service to users (4 igpm at 40 psi) ‐ The upgraded system will enable development around Horseshoe Canyon ‐ 2 scenarios are being presented – a system for residential use only and a system that would accommodate a commercial zone as well as residential ‐ The upgrade will include a direct feed line to the reservoir from the Aqua 7 Water Commission ‐ The direct feed line will require easements through privately owned property ‐ The majority of waterlines will be directionally drilled in road allowance ‐ The history of previous waterlines constructed had all identified users within the system paying a fee to have a riser installed at property line. There was no option to opt out. ‐ Some existing users may be required to realign their service line due to some alterations to the main distribution line layout ‐ The old distribution lines would be abandoned in place    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item # 6.2.1 2 | Page  COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    Project estimated costs: Engineering: Project Engineering - $ 1,173,090 + 15% contingency $ 175,963.50 $ 1,349,053.50 Construction: Residential Only – $ 14,185,000 + 10% contingency $ 1,418,500 $ 15,603,500 Commercial and Residential - $ 19,385,000 + 10% contingency $ 1,938,500 $ 21,323,500 The proposed source of funding would be from operating funds allocated to existing Churchill projects, existing cash reserves and local improvement tax. If a local improvement is approved, that funding source takes priority over existing reserves. Administration will continue to explore grant funding options. COMMUNICATIONS:    Website LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN:    Viable Communities ATTACHMENTS:    Power Point presentation Project Letter from Engineer   RECOMMENDED ACTION:    1. Council to postpone any further discussion regarding Churchill Water until a Committee of the Whole meeting in which all options can be presented and discussed. 2. Council to choose either existing Committee of the Whole dates or choose a new date to discuss the Churchill Water options.   COUNCIL OPTIONS:  1. Council to postpone discussion until Committee of the Whole. 2. Council to not postpone discussion to a Committee of the Whole. 3. Direct administration to pursue the construction/upgrade of the Churchill water system to include residential design only, funds from current allocation of budget projects (B1606, B1747), funding from existing Water reserve, WSA reserve and local improvement tax. 4. Direct administration to pursue the construction/upgrade of the Churchill water system to include both residential and commercial design 5. Accept as information. MOTION:    That Council moves to postpone further discussion on the Churchill Water System until the _________ Committee of the Whole. ___________________________ Prepared By: John McKiernan ____________________________ Approved By: Laurie Watt ______________________ Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Manager of Environmental Services Director of Municipal Services Chief Administrative Officer   Page 1 of 4 Kneehilll County Churchill Water Distribution and Reservoir February 18, 2018 WSP File: 161-09918-00 Kneehill County Box 400 Three Hills, AB T0M 2A0 ATTENTION: John McKiernan, Manager, Environmental Services RE: Churchill Water Service / Reservoir and Waterline Upgrade Project Update As requested by County representatives, WSP has compiled this letter to update the construction estimate and schedule to complete the Churchill Reservoir and Water Distribution System Project. Background Originally the County requested that WSP take a look at the existing Churchill water service area and complete a Feasibility Study to review various options for upgrade. In consultation with the County, WSP proposed two options for the upgrade of the system. Option 1 was based off of a residential and commercial/industrial growth analysis. This option included a 3000m3 reservoir, approximately 14km of large waterline for a commercial development, as well as some replacements and additions to the existing distribution system. Option 2 was based off of residential growth projections. This option included a 450m3 reservoir and some replacements and additions to the existing distribution system. Also, provided as part of the original proposed system design was multiple options for water supply to the proposed reservoir. The options presented included a connection from Kirkpatrick Reservoir, a connection from the Hesketh/Grainger System, and a connection from the existing Churchill Booster Station. After all items were reviewed with the County it was decided to proceed with the design of Option 1, with a slight change. In order to maximize the lifespan of the system the County decided that instead of a partial replacement of the existing distribution system they would like to replace all of the distribution system with new piping. The County also selected the Page 2 of 4 Kneehilll County Churchill Water Distribution and Reservoir connection from the Kirkpatrick reservoir due to the potential for a better water supply than the other options. WSP was asked to proceed with the design described above. Estimated Project Costs Estimated pricing is based on the 2 proposed options for the system. Option 1 is a Residential and Commercial/Industrial Growth and option 2 is just Residential Growth. The provided estimates include the full distribution system piping replacement and the Kirkpatrick water supply connection. The below chart outlines the estimated costs: Current Design Status and Schedule Distribution System Currently the chosen distribution system design is close to being completed, the plans will need to be finalized to incorporate the described information and prepare them for tendering. Also, the specification document will need to be prepared in order to fulfill the tendering requirements. Multiple approvals are still required before the design can be finalized, such as Alberta Transportation and CPR right of way approval, and purchasing the required land and easements. Alberta Transportation has explained that they do not see any issue with the waterline being installed in their right of way, but they will require additional information in order to gain full approval. CPR will need to be contacted, currently there is no confirmation that they will allow the line in their right of way. There is a small area for the proposed fill Description Option 1 (R+C/I) Option 2 (R) Proposed Churchill Distribution System Estimated Construction Cost $12,300,000.00 $11,300,000.00 Proposed Churchill Reservoir Estimated Construction Cost $6,100,000.00 $2,000,000.00 Proposed Kirkpatrick Reservoir Water Supply Connection Estimated Construction Costs $735,000.00 $735,000.00 Proposed Estimated Land Costs $250,000.00 $150,000.00 Total Construction Cost $19,385,000.00 $14,185,000.00 Page 3 of 4 Kneehilll County Churchill Water Distribution and Reservoir line as well as some commercial line that will require easement on private land, this can be time consuming depending on the landowner negotiations. There will be some delay in the schedule due to waiting for responses from Alberta Transportation, CPR, and Landowners regarding permission to install the waterline in their right of way or on their land. WSP along with the County will begin working with all required parties if the project is approved to proceed. In addition to the required approvals, the Geotechnical drilling will still need to be finalized for the distribution system. The County requested that we hold off on drilling until it is confirmed that the project will be going to construction. This drilling can be scheduled once the project is approved to proceed. Reservoir The current Reservoir drawings and design are based on Option 1, which includes a 3000 m3 tank, these drawings are at approximately 90% complete. In order to prepare these drawings for tendering we would need to complete a final review and edit of the drawing set. In addition to the drawing edits, WSP and the County will need to finalize the land purchase, Process Narrative, and complete the specification document in order to tender the reservoir project. All Geotechnical drilling for the reservoir site has been completed. The holes for the Geotechnical information were drilled in the ditch next to the site, because the county had not yet acquired the required property. No additional Geotechnical drilling will be required, unless the reservoir site location changes. Schedule WSP is proposing a schedule of a minimum of 12 weeks from project approval to prepare the project for tendering. We recommend that the project be out for tender for a minimum of 4 weeks in order to give contractors enough time to prepare their bids. This schedule could change if the scope of the project changes or the land acquisitions take longer than estimated. Page 4 of 4 Kneehilll County Churchill Water Distribution and Reservoir WSP is committed to working with Kneehill County towards the successful completion of the Churchill Water System Upgrades. Should you have any additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Marty Rowley, C.E.T., Project Manager WSP Attachments CC: Mike Minshall C.E.T, – WSP CHURCHILL RURAL WATER SYSTEM CHURCHILL WATER SERVICE SCOPE OF PRESENTATION Provide scenarios to upgrade water system Provide estimates for system upgrades Provide financial information CURRENT SYSTEM The water supply is connected through the distribution system of the Town of Drumheller No water storage Currently services 37 users, more than the original design of the system Booster station upgraded in 2013 Level of service to users is generally satisfied but, does not allow for expansion of system and development at Horseshoe Canyon Does not have a bulk water system to serve agriculture or commercial users MAP OF EXISTING CHURCHILL SYSTEM PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION SCENARIOS Reservoir and Pumping Facilities To accommodate future growth demands a new reservoir and pump station to be constructed Reservoir site is being proposed at a strategically location at a high point in the distribution (SW 30 -28-20 W4). The site for the reservoir will be determined on the success of purchasing land. Dedicated fill line to proposed reservoir from Aqua 7 Regional Commission distribution line. This will require easements on privately owned land. Bulk fill station will be available at new reservoir/pumphouse A total of 78 water connections identified including existing users and future new users Existing users on the system may need a new water service to house constructed due to the re-alignment of distribution lines 5 Existing users are non-county residents, actually residing in the boundaries of Drumheller The majority of waterlines will be directionally drilled in road allowance Scenario #1 Residential and Commercial with Fire Flow Reservoir would need to be designed and constructed for fire flow capacity 3,000 m3 Would include a pumphouse with 4 pumps 1 Dedicated fire pump 2 Distribution pumps (capable of delivering 53 L/s 1 Jockey pump (3 L/s) A looped piping system along Highway 9 for commercial use Would accommodate development around Horseshoe Canyon Would provide potential full flow for residential users (4 igpm @ 40 psi) All waterlines would be new construction and existing waterlines would be abandoned in place Proposed network of piping ranges in diameter sizes of 50mm to 300mm MAP OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL OPTION COMMERCIAL WATER LINE Noted oil and gas pipelines through properties located along proposed commercial water line Setbacks required for potential service road off of highway to access commercial zone Setbacks required to be a certain distance from oil and gas pipelines for construction of buildings No area structure plan for commercial development has been completed No engineered proposal to accommodate wastewater from commercial development Re-zoning of potential commercial sites has not begun AREA MAP OF OIL AND GAS PIPELINES Scenario #2 Residential Only Smaller 450 m3 reservoir would be constructed. Reservoir would be designed to accommodate future expansion if/when needed. A bulk water system would be available at the reservoir/pumphouse Proposed pipe sizing would range from 50mm to 100mm Would include a pumphouse with two pumps 2 distribution pumps with VFD. (Capable of 5.5 L/s) Would provide the water system users with the potential maximum of 4 igpm at 40 psi. This would be the same service provided to other rural water users within the County Would accommodate for development around Horseshoe Canyon MAP OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ONLY OPTION PROPOSED RESERVOIR FILL LINE SCENARIOS Option 1 –Connection to Aqua 7 •Would be most desirable option for a feed line due to the fact of the availability of the water to the County, as well, the Kirkpatrick reservoir would be able to accommodate a pumping system to be used and operated by the County to distribute to the new Churchill reservoir Option 2 –Provide a Dedicated Feed Line or Extend The Current Distribution Line From the Booster Station •Does not address the concerns of maintaining adequate supply pressure when users on the Drumheller distribution are drawing water before the booster station •The agreement in place with Drumheller for supplying water to the Churchill system has a limit of 10,000 igpd would not satisfy the residential demand and commercial use is unknown at this time. A new supply agreement would be necessary. Option 3 –Connection to Kneehill County Phase II Pipeline •Was determined to be the least desirable as it would negatively impact 80% of users connected to the Grainger water system during times when the Churchill system is drawing water PROPOSED RESERVOIR TIE-IN OPTIONS COST ESTIMATIONS DESCRIPTION (RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL) SUPPLY AND INSTALL 1 3,000m3 RESERVOIR, PUMP STATION AND TRUCK FILL $ 6,100,000 2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE, INCLUDING 300mm SUPPLY LINE FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. (all pipe directionally drilled) $ 12,300,00 3 DEDICATED RESERVOIR FILL LINE, CONNECTED TO AQUA 7 $ 735,000 4 PROPOSED ESTIMATED LAND COSTS $ 250,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE $ 19,385,000 DESCRIPTION (RESIDENTIAL ONLY) SUPPLY AND INSTALL 1 450m3 RESERVOIR, PUMP STATION AND TRUCK FILL $ 2,000,000 2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM UPGRADE (all piped directionally drilled)$ 11,300,000 3 DEDICATED RESERVOIR FILL LINE, CONNECTED TO AQUA 7 $ 735,000 4 PROPOSED ESTIMATED LAND COSTS $ 150,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE $ 14,185,000 The Distribution portion of the project design phase is close to being completed, the plans will just need to be finalized to incorporate the described information and prepare them for tendering. Multiple approvals are still required before the final design can be finalized, such as Alberta Transportation and CPR right of way approval o Alberta Transportation has explained that they do not see any issue with the waterline being installed in there right of way, but they will require additional information in order to gain full approval. o CPR will need to be contacted, currently there is no confirmation that they will allow the waterline in their right of way. There is a small area for the proposed fill line as well as some commercial line that will require easement on private land this can be time consuming depending on the negotiations with the land owners. Geotechnical drilling that is required for the distribution system will need to be finalized. * A minimum of 12 weeks from project approval would be required in order to finalize and prepare the project for tendering. It would be recommended that the tender be out for a minimum of 4 weeks in order to give contractors enough time to prepare their bids. ** This schedule of 12 weeks could change if the scope of the project changes or the land acquisitions take longer than estimated. TIMELINES FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 1)Current Allocation of Project →B1606 Churchill Water Engineering = $967,000 approximately →B1747 Churchill Water Storage = $99,000 approximately ** Funds remaining for these projects can be applied directly to the new project if Council approved 2) Reserves →Current unrestricted funds available approximately up to $11.2 million coming from reserves (Water-$6.8 mill. and Water Service Area-$4.4 mill.) →Current Water Service Area reserve ($4.4 million approx.) accumulation from unrestricted general taxation as interim financing from previous WSA project. →Reserves currently backed by cash but will need to look at overall cash financial position when heavy project expenditures occur and consider 2019 overall budget →$6.8 million in Water reserve accumulated from net operating and surplus funds 3) Local Improvement Taxes →Used If landowner expected to pay portion of cost →Rules to impose this tax outlined in Section 391, Part 10, Division 7 of the Municipal Government Act, including requirement of Local Improvement Plan →A Local Improvement Tax is subject to a petition right in Section 396 of the MGA if residents in that area are opposed → Question For Council To Consider: Is the amount to charge Churchill residents to be the same for those charged in the other WSA project ($6,000 up front/resident) or ($563 annually paid over 15 years) ? →Of the previous WSA project expenditures of approx. $49.3 million, this source contributed approx. $6.8 million of total (approximately 14%) →On estimated $14.2 million project total = (14%) $2,000,000 in revenue raised / 78 residents = $25,500 per resident –approximately. With assumption made the 37 existing treated the same as new *** Scenario: At $10,000 per resident, that would generate $780,000 if paid up front. *** Scenario: Another option would be to allow residences to pay annually approximately $840 over 15 years, similar to the amortization schedule of the other WSA project. Interest rate would be used as ACFA rate as of date approved FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 4) Grants –MSI Capital →No allocation of funds towards 2019 project →Not yet confirmed by Province, approval only on year by year basis. Although according to Provincial plan notes, MSI expected to carry forward into 2019 →Estimated funds = $2.6 million 5) Special Tax →Rules apply as per Section 382 Part 10, Division 5 of the MGA, and are very specific. →Total assessment in that designated area that is not already on the WSA = approximately $12,934,050. If same tax rate used as WSA (.00022) total taxation would be $2,845 (@ 20 years = $56,900 projected revenue) *** Scenario: Continue to apply special tax rate (.007) to all non-residential properties and (.0022) to residential/farmland properties within the designated water service area which has been done in prior years. The annual by-law included “WHEREAS a special tax bylaw authorizes the Council to impose the tax in respect of property in any area of the municipality that will benefit from the specific service or purpose stated in the bylaw” 6) Operating Funds –General Taxation →This option would mean every taxable property in the County would pay for this water project →Used in the old Water Service Area (WSA) as an interim method to raise revenue before grant revenue funds were sourced. When those grant funds were received, those general tax dollars were allocated to other projects →In the end, zero general taxation dollars were intended to be paid for the old Water Service Area (WSA) project. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 7) Short Term Borrowing →This is NOT a revenue source, but is a cash flow tool →Cash is not anticipated to be an issue, but wont know for sure until the 2019 budget deliberations →Servus Line of Credit available = $2.5 million →Would be paid back using any of the revenue sources in options 1-6 8) Long Term Debt →This is NOT a revenue source, but is a cash flow tool →Cash is not anticipated to be an issue, but wont know for sure until the 2019 budget deliberations →Alberta Capital Finance Authority (ACFA) published rate as of Feb 1, 2018 on 10 year term is 2.937% **** Scenario: 10 years at 2.937% on 10,000,000 principle equals 1,634,797.80 total interest payable and on 5,000,000 principle equals 817,399.00 total interest payable. On the old Water Service Area (WSA) project $17.3 million was borrowed through debentures ($11 million for 10 years, $6.3 million for 5 years). Cashflow never ended up being issue as grants were available that were not anticipated in the original project planning →Would be paid back using revenue sources in options 1-6 Document Last Updated March 3, 2015    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  6.5.1    SUBJECT:    Peace Officer Rural Crime Deterrent Initiative Proposal MEETING DATE:    2018-02-27 PRESENTED BY:    Debra Grosfield, Manager of Protective Services, Communications Officer BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    At the Kneehill County Council Strategic Planning Session in February 2018, Council set as a significant priority, a strategy to assist in deterring rural crime, by the addition of one or more Community Peace Officers to patrol rural areas on a regular and frequent basis. We currently have two Level 1 Community Peace Officers at 37.5 hours per week. Winter and summer shifts will vary in order to cover longer hours. CURRENT ALLOCATIONS PROPOSED (Addition of two Level 2 CPO’s) Duties    CPO 1 CPO 2 CPO 3 CPO 4  Municipal Contract Patrols  10    Hamlet Patrols  2.5 5 5  Road Patrols Highway(s)  10    Road Patrols local  3 28 28  Bylaw, Contact Reports with Public  5 1 1  Administrative Functions 1 1.5 1.5 1.5  Assisting Other Departments  .5 1.5    Park Patrols 1 1.5 2 2  Community Related (Parades, Events) 5 2.5    School Resource (In Schools) 15       School Program Administration 15     Total Weekly Hours per CPO 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5  Community Peace Officers cannot engage in enforcing criminal code violations. Level 1 Community Peace Officer can enforce moving traffic violations, a Level 2 Officer cannot. REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item # 6.5.1 2 | Page  DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    There are a several options: 1. Hire ONE Level 2 Peace Officer 2. Hire TWO Level 2 Peace Officers 3. Hire ONE Level 1 Peace Officer 4. Hire ONE Level 1 Peace Officer and ONE Level 2 Peace Officer 5. Hire TWO Level 1 Peace Officers The Protective Services Department Organizational Chart should two Community Peace Officers be approved: With a two Community Peace Officer scenario we would assign roles and duties differently to ensure there is a reporting structure. Also it should be noted that by approving two Community Peace Officers, there would be added ability to create the Community Resource Officer role, expanding our visibility in the schools and in the community. Scenario with four Officers: 1. Community Resource Officer – Level 1 (school programs, community engagement and public engagement, patrols) 2. Community Peace Officer Supervisor – Level 1 (bylaw enforcement, patrols, organize patrol services to ensure goals are being met, safety, back up for resource officer) 3. Community Peace Officer – Level 1 or 2 (patrols, bylaw enforcement) 4. Community Peace Officer – Level 1 or 2 (patrols, bylaw enforcement) The Protective Services Department Organizational Chart should ONE Peace Officer be approved: Document Last Updated March 3, 2015  COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    Option 1: LEVEL 2 PEACE OFFICER: TOTAL $256,770 (Annually)(2018 impact $198,380) Wage level 6 ($56,972-70,068), plus benefits Computer, cell phone: $9,350 Camera equipment (per officer): $5,500 Uniforms, PPE, Radio: $6,000 Capital: $50,000 (truck with decals, radios, lights) Fuel: $6,000 Equipment/Vehicles Repair and Maintenance: $4,750 Option 2: LEVEL 1 PEACE OFFICER: TOTAL $293,680 (Annually)(2018 impact $224,987) Wage level 8 ($67,025-82,432), plus benefits Computer, cell phone: $9,350 Camera equipment (per officer): $5,500 Uniforms, PPE, Radio: $6,000 Capital: $50,000 (truck with decals, radios, lights) Radar: $6,000 Fuel: $6,000 Equipment/Vehicles Repair and Maintenance: $4,750 *Note: Option 1 2018 budget impact reduced by $58,390 due to reduced year. Option 2 2018 budget impact reduced by $68,693 due to reduced year. Funding options: 1. Collapse the Economic Development Budget ($207,491 budgeted in 2018 and currently not staffed) and redistribute the funds to the Enforcement specific GL’s. 2. Amend the 2018 Operating Budget to reflect the increase. (funded through new tax dollars) 3. Fund through the Contingency budget ENGAGEMENT:    Consultative: Within Protective Services Department, Public Education Informative: Municipalities in area, as well as shared information with Kneehill County staff, Public Education, Schools LINK TO  STRATEGIC PLAN:  Priority 3 of February 2018 Strategic Plan Safe and Viable Communities, Strategic Plan 2015-2018 ATTACHMENTS:  RECOMMENDED  ACTION:  1. Kneehill County Council adds two Level 2 Peace Officers in 2018 budget. 2. Amend the 2018 Operating Budget and fund through tax dollars. COUNCIL  OPTIONS:  1. Approve the recommendation as presented. 2. Amend the recommendation as presented. 3. Administration to research other options. MOTION:    Kneehill County Council directs Administration to add two Level 2 Community Peace Officers for the Kneehill County Rural Crime Deterrent Initiative and to amend the 2018 Operating and Capital Budget.        Prepared By: Debra Grosfield Approved By: Laurie Watt Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Manager of Protective Services and Communications Officer Director of Municipal Services Chief Administrative Officer   Document Last Updated March 3, 2015    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  6.5.2    SUBJECT:  Kneehill County Rural Fire Strategy- Fire Chief Proposal MEETING DATE: 2018-02-27 PRESENTED BY: Debra Grosfield, Manager of Protective Services, Communications Officer BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    At the Kneehill County Council Strategic Planning Session in February 2018, Council set the priority to create a Rural Fire Strategy through the hiring of a Fire Chief to accomplish this task and other duties. DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:  The Fire Chief position description has been attached, including key duties of developing a long term strategy for County rural fire services, managing Kneehill County’s Fire Department, working with our municipally contracted fire departments, managing the regional fire training structure, and emergency management roles. COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    Fire Chief Wage Grid Proposal: $136,367.50 (Salary including benefits) Fire Services vehicle: $32,500 (capital budget) utilizing existing vehicle up for replacement Fire Services equipment: uniform, firefighting gear, cell phone, computer: 9,000 Fuel: $6,000 Vehicle Repair and Maintenance: $4,500 Total: $188, 367.50 Funding Options: 1. Collapse the Economic Development Budget (currently not staffed) and transfer funds to the Fire Chief specific budget 2. Amend the 2018 Operating Budget to fund position out of tax dollars. 3. Fund the position out of the contingency fund. ENGAGEMENT:    Consultative: Within Protective Services Department, Torrington Fire Informative: FMC committee and all other Fire Departments/Municipalities in area, as well as shared information with Kneehill County staff. LINK TO STRATEGIC  PLAN:  Priority 2 of February 2018 Strategic Plan Safe and Viable Communities, Strategic Plan 2015-2018 ATTACHMENTS: Fire Chief Position Profile RECOMMENDED  ACTION:  Kneehill County adds a Fire Chief to the Organizational Chart, and funds the position through collapsing the Economic Development Budget and transferring the funds to the appropriate budget line items.    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item # 6.5.2 2 | Page    COUNCIL OPTIONS:  1. Approve the recommendation as presented. 2. Amend the recommendation as presented. 3. Administration to research other options. MOTION:    Kneehill County Council directs Administration to add a Fire Chief to the Organizational Chart, and funds the position through collapsing the Economic Development budget and transferring the funds to the appropriate budget line items.          Prepared By: Debra Grosfield Approved By: Laurie Watt Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Manager of Protective Services and Communications Officer Director of Municipal Services Chief Administrative Officer   Position Description POSITION TITLE: Fire Services Coordinator DEPARTMENT: Protective Services GRID PLACEMENT: Level 10 REPORTS TO: Manager Protective Services POSITION SUMMARY Under the direction of the Manager Protective Services, this position is accountable for the effective planning, development, coordination, implementation and delivery of fire programs and services to the County. This position will play a key role in the development and implementation of a rural fire service strategy for the County. KEY DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES a. Key Responsibilities  Creation of a long-term rural fire service strategy for Council approval.  Administers Fire Service Agreements, Mutual Aid Agreements and other associated contracts and agreements.  Enforces the Alberta Fire Code as required by the Safety Codes Act and the Joint Quality Management Plan. Conducts fire investigations and site inspections as required.  Provide input to the Manager of Protective Services in the preparation of annual operation and capital budgets for fire services; assists in the administration of annual operating budget along with capital projects and purchases.  Coordinates required inspections and performance testing for fire apparatus and equipment owned by the County.  When required, provides fire service and emergency scene command including scene evaluation, strategy and tactics to be employed, direction of emergency personnel and resources to effectively and efficiently bring the situation to a safe conclusion, while ensuring compliance with the standard operating guidelines of the County. May be required to assume the role of Director of Emergency Management or other positions as required.  Administers the emergency 911 contract for the County and partnering member fire departments.  Processes requests for fire permits, oversees and monitors enforcement and ensure provisions of the fire Bylaw are enacted.  Maintains records as required to meet OH&S regulatory requirements and the statistical reporting requirements of the Office of the Fire Commissioner.  Acts as Chairperson of the Fire Management Committee. Promotes and maintains harmonious and cooperative working relationships between the fire departments as well as with other public safety agencies, other municipal and provincial department, and the public in general.  Coordinates the use of the Regional Fire Training Facility; associated policies and guidelines for use by fire departments within our boundaries.  Coordinate training opportunities for member departments and provides guidance with pre-incident planning and fire prevention activities.  Work with County CAO to set County fire bans when appropriate.  Provides administrative direction and leadership to by way of policy and bylaw recommendations and the development of standard operating guidelines of the service. Provides ongoing support in the development and implementation of the County’s rural fire service strategy.  Promote awareness of fire prevention programs, and work with member fire departments in the delivery of programs to the communities. b. Decision Making and Accountability This position reports directly to the Manager of Protective Services. It requires the ability to work independently, yet cooperatively in addressing the fire service obligations of the municipality while working with the partnering member fire departments throughout the County. c. Administrative Responsibility This position is also responsible for providing fire services leadership and guidance to Kneehill County public and volunteer members of the Torrington Fire Department. Key attributes include demonstrated liaison experience, strategic thinker and history of promoting a collaborative approach. d. Contact Works closely with the partnering member Fire Chiefs in coordinating and planning activities in addition to required training. Develops and maintains external relationships with public and private sector professionals and colleagues, including that of the Provincial Fire Commissioners Office and the Alberta Fire Chief’s Association. e. Working Conditions This position can involve extensive outside travel in addressing the needs and requirements of rural fire services. This includes attendance at emergencies located throughout the County and conducting inspections and investigations under the Safety Codes Discipline. POSITION REQUIREMENTS  NFPA 10-01 Firefighter Level 2  NFPA 10-21 Fire Officer Level 1 Certificate or combination of relevant experience  NFPA 10-41 Fire Service Instructor Level 2 desired  Alberta Safety Codes Officer in Fire Discipline Level B2 and C2 desired  NFPA 10-51 Wildland Firefighting desired  Proven training and operational experience of not less than 5 years with firefighting experience.  ICS 300 Incident Command System  Class 3 Alberta Driver’s License with Q (air brake) endorsement  Working knowledge of the AB Building Code, AB Safety Codes Act and the Forest and Prairie Protection Act.  Strong cognitive ability to balance the big picture while focusing on the details of process and systems, demonstrates commitment to public service  Strong communication, problem solving, interpersonal and conciliatory skills.  Commitment to building a strong team-oriented corporate culture. For Office Administration Use Only Last updated: February 12, 2018 Current Incumbent: 1 Carolyn Van der Kuil From:Al Hoggan Sent:Thursday, February 08, 2018 12:36 PM To:Carolyn Van der Kuil Subject:Fwd: Drumheller RCMP Mayor Report - January 2018 Attachments:Drumheller Provincial January 2018.pdf; ATT00001.htm Al Hoggan, CLGM Chief Administrative Officer Kneehill County Begin forwarded message: From: Kevin CHARLES <Kevin.Charles@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> Date: February 8, 2018 at 12:35:38 PM MST To: Margaret McClarty <carbon.cao@gmail.com>, <al.hoggan@kneehillcounty.com>, <cao.delia@netago.ca>, <morrin@netago.ca>, "munson@netago.ca" <munson@netago.ca>, <shirley@starlandcounty.com>, Alan Parkin <alan.parkin@wheatlandcounty.ca> Subject: Drumheller RCMP Mayor Report - January 2018 Good afternoon, January 2018 shows crime to be at the one of the lowest when compared to January over the past 5 years. There is a reduction in both crimes against persons and substantially in crimes against property compared to previous years. There was a rise in false alarm calls to police and motor vehicle collisions remain consistent. I am pleased to see an increase in suspicious persons/property/vehicles being reported for us to investigate. There was also a substantial increase in traffic tickets handed out in the rural areas. We continue to strive to change driving behaviours for the better and keep our roads safe. I am pleased to announce Cpl Trent Sperlie was the successful candidate for the Hanna Detachment Commander competition. I am currently working with Staffing to fill his pending vacant position in Drumheller as the rural supervisor. Cst Daryn Pysklywyc will be transferring into Drumheller very soon. He brings with him eight years of policing experience. We anticipate he will be joining us around mid-March. As always, please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Kevin S/Sgt. Kevin Charles Detachment Commander 2 Royal Canadian Mounted Police P.O. Box 1030; 75 Riverside Drive East Drumheller, AB T0J 0Y0 Admin Tel: (403) 823-7590 Complaints: (403) 823-2630 Fax: (403) 823-7505 Email: Kevin.Charles@rcmp-grc.gc.ca This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen. This Report is generated from the PROS database and current scoring of files. All homicide files are not included in this report. All categories contain "Attempted" and/or "Completed" CATEGORY Trend 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Homicides & Offences Related to Death 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Assaults 0 0 1 0 0 Other Sexual Offences 0 0 1 0 0 Assault 2 0 0 1 0 Kidnapping/Hostage/Abduction 0 0 0 0 0 Extortion 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Harassment 1 0 0 3 1 Uttering Threats 0 0 0 0 0 Other Persons 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PERSONS 3 0 2 4 1 Break & Enter 0 1 0 4 2 Theft of Motor Vehicle 0 0 0 1 1 Theft Over $5,000 1 0 0 1 0 Theft Under $5,000 0 2 2 20 2 Possn Stn Goods 0 1 0 0 0 Fraud 0 1 2 2 1 Arson 0 0 0 0 0 Mischief To Property 0 3 3 3 2 TOTAL PROPERTY 1 8 7 31 8 Offensive Weapons 0 0 0 0 0 Public Order 0 0 0 0 0 Disturbing the peace 2 0 2 0 0 OTHER CRIMINAL CODE 4 0 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER CRIMINAL CODE 6 0 2 0 0 TOTAL CRIMINAL CODE 10 8 11 35 9 February-08-18 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Statistical Comparison January to January: 2014 - 2018 This Report is generated from the PROS database and current scoring of files. All homicide files are not included in this report. All categories contain "Attempted" and/or "Completed" CATEGORY Trend 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Drug Enforcement - Production 0 0 0 0 0 Drug Enforcement - Possession 0 0 0 0 0 Drug Enforcement - Trafficking 0 0 0 0 0 Drug Enforcement - Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Drugs 0 0 0 0 0 Federal - General 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FEDERAL 0 0 0 0 0 Liquor Act 2 0 0 0 0 Other Provincial Stats 2 4 3 4 1 Total Provincial Stats 4 4 3 4 1 Municipal By-laws Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 Municipal By-laws 0 0 0 0 0 Total Municipal 0 0 0 0 0 Fatals 0 1 0 0 0 Injury MVC 0 2 0 0 0 Property Damage MVC (Reportable)14 14 17 15 16 Property Damage MVC (Non Reportable)6 2 2 3 2 TOTAL MVC 20 19 19 18 18 Provincial Traffic 26 14 18 12 66 Other Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Code Traffic 2 1 2 0 1 Common Police Activities False Alarms 2 1 0 2 5 False/Abandoned 911 Call and 911 Act 1 12 2 5 1 Suspicious Person/Vehicle/Property 0 1 0 0 4 Persons Reported Missing 0 0 0 1 0 Spousal Abuse - Survey Code 0 1 0 2 1 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Statistical Comparison January to January: 2014 - 2018 This Report is generated from the PROS database and current scoring of files. All homicide files are not included in this report. All categories contain "Attempted" and/or "Completed" CATEGORY Trend 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Homicides & Offences Related to Death 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery 0 0 0 0 0 Sexual Assaults 0 0 1 0 0 Other Sexual Offences 0 0 1 0 0 Assault 2 0 0 1 0 Kidnapping/Hostage/Abduction 0 0 0 0 0 Extortion 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Harassment 1 0 0 3 1 Uttering Threats 0 0 0 0 0 Other Persons 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL PERSONS 3 0 2 4 1 Break & Enter 0 1 0 4 2 Theft of Motor Vehicle 0 0 0 1 1 Theft Over $5,000 1 0 0 1 0 Theft Under $5,000 0 2 2 20 2 Possn Stn Goods 0 1 0 0 0 Fraud 0 1 2 2 1 Arson 0 0 0 0 0 Mischief To Property 0 3 3 3 2 TOTAL PROPERTY 1 8 7 31 8 Offensive Weapons 0 0 0 0 0 Public Order 0 0 0 0 0 Disturbing the peace 0 0 2 0 0 OTHER CRIMINAL CODE 6 0 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER CRIMINAL CODE 6 0 2 0 0 TOTAL CRIMINAL CODE 10 8 11 35 9 February-08-18 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Statistical Comparison January: 2014 - 2018 This Report is generated from the PROS database and current scoring of files. All homicide files are not included in this report. All categories contain "Attempted" and/or "Completed" CATEGORY Trend 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Drug Enforcement - Production 0 0 0 0 0 Drug Enforcement - Possession 0 0 0 0 0 Drug Enforcement - Trafficking 0 0 0 0 0 Drug Enforcement - Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Drugs 0 0 0 0 0 Federal - General 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FEDERAL 0 0 0 0 0 Liquor Act 2 0 0 0 0 Other Provincial Stats 2 4 3 4 1 Total Provincial Stats 4 4 3 4 1 Municipal By-laws Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 Municipal By-laws 0 0 0 0 0 Total Municipal 0 0 0 0 0 Fatals 0 1 0 0 0 Injury MVC 0 2 0 0 0 Property Damage MVC (Reportable)14 14 17 15 16 Property Damage MVC (Non Reportable)6 2 2 3 2 TOTAL MVC 20 19 19 18 18 Provincial Traffic 26 14 18 12 66 Other Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Code Traffic 2 1 2 0 1 Common Police Activities False Alarms 2 1 0 2 5 False/Abandoned 911 Call and 911 Act 1 12 2 5 1 Suspicious Person/Vehicle/Property 0 1 0 0 4 Persons Reported Missing 0 0 0 1 0 Spousal Abuse - Survey Code 0 1 0 2 1 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Statistical Comparison January: 2014 - 2018 1 Carolyn Van der Kuil From:Al Hoggan Sent:Thursday, February 15, 2018 3:30 PM To:Carolyn Van der Kuil Subject:Fwd: Drumheller Rural Detachment 2017 Year End CompStat Report Attachments:Drumheller Provincial Detachment CompStat Report - January - December 2017.pdf; ATT00001.htm Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Al Hoggan, CLGM Chief Administrative Officer Kneehill County (403)-443-5541 (403)-443-1643 (cell) Begin forwarded message: From: Kevin CHARLES <Kevin.Charles@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> Date: February 15, 2018 at 3:18:40 PM MST To: Margaret McClarty <carbon.cao@gmail.com>, <al.hoggan@kneehillcounty.com>, <cao.delia@netago.ca>, <morrin@netago.ca>, "munson@netago.ca" <munson@netago.ca>, <shirley@starlandcounty.com>, Alan Parkin <alan.parkin@wheatlandcounty.ca> Subject: Drumheller Rural Detachment 2017 Year End CompStat Report Good afternoon everyone, Attached please find our 2017 year-end CompStat Report for Drumheller RCMP Rural Detachment. A few highlights: - We had 1021 calls for service in 2017, an increase of 17% from 2016. - October had the most files; April had the least. - Mondays are our busiest days; Sundays are our quietest. - Approximately 25% of our files are received at the front counter or self-generated by members. This report will be considered heavily when I am determining our Annual Priorities for this upcoming fiscal year. Should you or anyone else have any questions about the report, please let me know. Thanks Kevin 2 S/Sgt. Kevin Charles Detachment Commander Royal Canadian Mounted Police P.O. Box 1030; 75 Riverside Drive East Drumheller, AB T0J 0Y0 Admin Tel: (403) 823-7590 Complaints: (403) 823-2630 Fax: (403) 823-7505 Email: Kevin.Charles@rcmp-grc.gc.ca This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen. Date: C o m p S t a t Strategic and Performance Planning February 14, 2018 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Operations Strategy Branch "K" Division January - December, 2017 Drumheller Provincial Detachment File Counts In 2017 October had the most files generated (2016: September) , while April had the least. (2016: January). Based on PROS data, the Drumheller Provincial Detachment generated 1,021 files between January - December, 2017. This includes calls for service from the public as well as self-generated and proactive files. There was an increase of 17.2% in 2017 when compared to 2016. 997 860 822 871 1,021 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Drumheller Provincial Detachment -PROS Files by Year 0 50 100 150 200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Drumheller Provincial Detachment -PROS Files by Month 2016 2017 "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 2 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Generated file times: Monday had the most files generated, while Sunday had the least. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total 0 1 3 8 7 1 3 11 34 1 2 1 2 0 4 1 8 18 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 9 24 3 4 0 3 2 0 5 5 19 4 1 2 5 2 1 0 2 13 5 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 6 6 2 3 3 1 6 1 1 17 7 1 12 10 3 5 7 0 38 8 5 15 8 9 6 4 7 54 9 8 8 16 7 11 7 5 62 10 4 8 19 7 5 10 3 56 11 3 14 9 16 15 5 6 68 12 6 15 8 7 6 7 3 52 13 4 19 14 12 6 3 8 66 14 1 13 10 13 8 14 5 64 15 10 6 10 16 9 7 9 67 16 7 12 9 7 7 6 4 52 17 9 13 13 7 7 11 5 65 18 6 6 8 4 5 10 12 51 19 2 13 4 8 4 5 11 47 20 7 5 4 11 5 7 8 47 21 5 5 5 5 4 13 7 44 22 6 8 7 5 3 5 2 36 23 4 5 2 4 2 2 2 21 Total 102 191 181 156 122 136 133 Day H o u r o f t h e D a y The following chart illustrates when all PROS files were generated. The chart ranges from least calls for service/files generated (green) to the highest number of calls for service/files generated (red) and is broken down by day (columns) and each hour of the day (rows). "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 3 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment File Generation by Zone: Zone 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 SC 517 424 363 411 460 KC 178 130 155 185 230 WHC 211 210 193 195 197 Other 66 87 91 57 101 SA2 21 5 17 20 30 C6 4 4 3 3 3 The following graph and table shows a break-down of where files were generated in 2017 as well as a comparison to previous years for how many files were generated in each. The zone 'Other' is used for files that were improperly zoned. In 2017 the zone 'SC' had the most files generated. Drumheller Provincial Detachment - PROS Files by Zone SC 45.1% KC 22.5% WHC 19.3% Other 9.9% SA2 2.9%C6 0.3% Drumheller Provincial Detachment -PROS Files by Zone -2017 "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 4 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Public Calls for Service (CIIDS Files): 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total 0 1 1 2 3 0 1 5 13 1 2 1 2 0 4 1 4 14 2 4 2 3 2 1 1 3 16 3 3 0 3 2 0 5 3 16 4 1 2 4 2 1 0 2 12 5 0 3 1 1 0 1 0 6 6 2 3 3 1 6 1 1 17 7 1 12 8 3 4 6 0 34 8 5 10 7 8 4 4 7 45 9 7 5 11 4 8 5 4 44 10 3 6 8 4 4 7 2 34 11 2 11 6 8 9 3 5 44 12 4 13 6 4 5 4 3 39 13 4 15 11 7 4 1 7 49 14 0 7 3 6 3 6 5 30 15 5 6 1 1 6 7 9 35 16 5 7 7 4 6 6 4 39 17 8 11 12 7 6 11 4 59 18 6 6 8 4 5 9 11 49 19 2 13 4 7 4 5 8 43 20 7 5 4 8 5 5 8 42 21 4 4 5 5 3 13 5 39 22 4 7 7 5 3 5 2 33 23 4 5 2 3 2 1 2 19 Total 84 155 128 99 93 108 104 Day H o u r o f t h e D a y When just OCC calls for service are considered, Monday had the most calls for service while Sunday had the least. The following chart shows calls for service for 2017 broken down by day and hour of the day. There were 250 self-generated, front counter and proactive files created in 2017 accounting for 24.5% of all files generated. There were 771 calls for service from the public through the OCC in 2017. "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 5 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Top Ten File Types by Workload and by File Count: The two graphs below show the top 10 files types that were generated in 2017 both by estimated workload and by frequency. 18.01% 11.19% 5.43% 5.20% 4.78% 3.41% 3.41% 3.13% 2.62% 2.48% Murder 1st Degree MVC - Property Damage - Reportable Criminal Harassment Other theft under $5000 Mental Health Act - Other Activities Animal Calls Abandoned Vehicles Other Moving Traffic Violations Other Prov Statutes - Other Activities Break and Enter - Business Drumheller Provincial Detachment -Top Ten File Types by Workload (2017) 161 62 61 60 52 49 33 31 31 30 MVC - Property Damage - Reportable Other Moving Traffic Violations Other theft under $5000 Suspicious Person/ Vehicle/ Property 911 Act - Other Activities Assistance to General Public Moving Traffic - Speeding Violations False Alarms Other Non-Moving Traffic Animal Calls Drumheller Provincial Detachment -Top Ten File Types by Count (2017) "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 6 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment Distribution of Files 0 50 100 150 200 Ja n Fe b Ma r Ap r Ma y Ju n Ju l Au g Se p Oc t No v De c PROS Files by Month 0 50 100 150 200 250 Sun Mon Tues Weds Thurs Fri Sat PROS files by Day of the Week 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96 10 4 11 2 12 0 12 8 13 6 14 4 15 2 16 0 PROS Files by Hour of the Week 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 PROS Files Week of the Year "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 7 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment - Files by Day 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Sunday -PROS Files by Hour of Day 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Monday -PROS Files by Hour of Day 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Tuesday -PROS Files by Hour of Day 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Wednesday -PROS FIles by Hour of Day 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Thursday -PROS Files by Hour of Day 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Friday -PROS Files by Hour of Day 0 5 10 15 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Saturday -PROS Files by Hour of Day 0 20 40 60 80 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 PROS Files by Hour of Day "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 8 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment - Criminal Code Traffic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 10 0 11 1 1 2 12 0 13 1 1 2 14 0 15 1 1 2 16 0 17 1 1 18 1 1 19 0 20 1 1 21 0 22 1 1 23 0 Total 2 1 0 1 1 3 3 Criminal Code Traffic - Day of the Week H o u r o f t h e D a y 0 1 2 3 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 1 2 0 3 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 Criminal Code Traffic -Drumheller Provincial Detachment (2017) "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 9 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment - Assaults (Excluding Sexual Assaults) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 1 1 9 1 1 10 0 11 1 1 12 0 13 1 1 14 1 1 2 15 0 16 1 1 2 17 0 18 1 1 19 1 1 20 1 1 2 21 1 1 22 0 23 0 Total 2 5 1 4 2 2 1 Assaults (Excluding Sexual Assaults) - Day of the Week H o u r o f t h e D a y 0 5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 1 0 0 5 3 0 3 2 1 2 Assaults (Excluding Sexual Assaults) -Drumheller Provincial Detachment (2017) "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 10 of 11 Drumheller Provincial Detachment - Injury & Fatal MVCs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Total 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 1 1 9 1 1 10 0 11 0 12 0 13 0 14 0 15 1 1 16 1 1 17 0 18 0 19 0 20 0 21 0 22 0 23 0 Total 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 Injury & Fatal MVCs - Day of the Week H o u r o f t h e D a y 0 1 1 2 2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 Injury & Fatal MVCs -Drumheller Provincial Detachment (2017) "K" Division OSB - CompStat Report Page 11 of 11 Document Last Updated April 15, 2014    REQUEST FOR DECISION   Agenda Item #  11.0    SUBJECT:    Council Follow-Up Action List   MEETING DATE:    2018-02-27   PRESENTED BY:    Al Hoggan, CAO   BACKGROUND/  PROPOSAL    To request Council’s acceptance of the Council Follow-Up Action List.   DISCUSSION/  OPTIONS/  BENEFITS/  DISADVANTAGES:    Please find attached the Council Follow-Up Action List. The Council Follow- up Action list is a list of items from Council meetings that require follow-up. This document is regularly updated after each Council meeting.   COSTS/SOURCE OF  FUNDING:    N/A   COMMUNICATIONS:    N/A   LINK TO STRATEGIC PLAN:    N/A   ATTACHMENTS:    February 27, 2018 Council Follow-Up Action List   RECOMMENDED ACTION:    Receive as information.     COUNCIL OPTIONS:  1. Receive as information 2. Council provide further direction or required changes/amendments. MOTION:    That Council receive for information the February 27, 2018 Council Follow-Up Action List as presented.              Prepared By: Carolyn Van der Kuil Approved By: Al Hoggan Reviewed By: Al Hoggan Executive Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Chief Administrative Officer    Meeting Date Motion #Description/Motion Action Required Assigned To Due Date Status 23-Jan-18 27-18 Councillor McGhee moved that Council direct Administration to draft a letter, signed by the Reeve, to the Minister of Municipal Affairs regarding the Assessment Year Modifiers for Wells and Pipeline Assessments. 23-Jan-18 32-18 Councillor McGhee moved that Council direct Administration to create a draft Communications policy to better define the parameters of the Coffee with Council meetings, and to present it at the last Council meeting in February.In Progress 13-Feb-18 42-18 Councillor McGhee moved to appoint Councillor Christie to replace Deputy Reeve King on the IDP Committee with the Town of Trochu.COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 43-18 Reeve Wittstock moved to accept Policy #15-13, Rural Community Halls with the removal of the Crossroads Community Centre and Funding Level C as presented.COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 44-18 Councillor Penner moved to receive for information the Elected Officials Education Program Opportunity being held on March 19, 2018, as part of the pre-conference program at the AAMDC Convention.COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 45-18 Councillor Christie moved that Council donate $1,000.00 per year for the next four years beginning in the 2018 budget year, to the Three Hills Arts Academy. COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 46-18 Reeve Wittstock moved to authorize the attendance of Councillors wishing to attend the Kneehill Area Community Discovery Nights 2018. COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 48-18 Councillor Christie moved to amend the motion to have the Rural Fire Strategy timeline moved from March 2018 to June 2018 in the Strategic Priorities Chart. DEFEATED COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 49-18 Deputy Reeve King moved to amend the motion to move the Wimborne Hamlet Strategy from the “Later Column” to “Next Column” and rename it Hamlet Strategy.COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 47-18 amended 50-18 Original Motion 47/18 Amended Reeve Wittstock moved that Council approves the amended 2018-2021Strategic Priorities Chart.COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 51-18 Reeve Wittstock moved that Council directs Administration to enter into the hybrid model contract with the Province of Alberta in regards to Designated Industrial Properties Assessment COMPLETED 13-Feb-18 52-18 Councillor Christie moved that Council approve to signing of the Community Futures Petition.COMPLETED Council Action Items STRATEGIC PRIORITIES CHART February 2018 CORPORATE PRIORITIES (Council/CAO)  NOW TIMELINE  1. CHURCHILL WATER LINE: Council Direction Feb.  2. 2018 BUDGET: Scenarios  April  3. RURAL FIRE STRATEGY: Position Proposal  March  4. COMMUNITY PEACE OFFICER: Position Proposal  March  5. USER FEE REVIEW: Targeted Services Feb.  NEXT   INTER‐MUN. COLLABORATION FRAMEWORKS   ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY   TOURISM & RECREATION MASTER PLAN:  Review   INTER‐MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS (IDP)  HAMLET STRATEGY    ADVOCACY   Three Hills Water   GFL: Aerator Evaluation   Regional Partnership Forum   Trochu Senior Housing   Doctor Recruitment & Retention: Support    LATER  ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN   LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN   MDP/LUB: Review    INDUSTRIAL AREA: Zoning   THREE HILLS EAST WATER: Options   INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING STRATEGY   HUMAN RESOURCE POLICY   RURAL FIRE SERVICE STRATEGY   COMMUNITY STANDARDS BYLAW: Update   YOUTH SPONSORSHIP: Policy Review  OPERATIONAL STRATEGIES (CAO/STAFF)  CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER  1. CPO: Position Proposal – Mar.  2. ICF Program: Approach – Mar.  3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY: ToR – Apr.   YOUTH SPONSORSHIP: Policy Review    Regional Partnership Forum  CORPORATE 1. 2018 BUDGET: Scenarios – April   2. HUMAN RESOURCE POLICY: Update – Mar.  3. USER FEE REVIEW: Targeted Services – Mar.   LONG TERM FINANCIAL PLAN   ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN  PROTECTIVE SERVICES   1. RURAL FIRE STRATEGY: Position Proposal – Mar.  2. COMMUNITY STANDARDS BYLAW: Update  3. OH & S: Legislative Compliance ‐ May   RURAL FIRE SERVICE STRATEGY     PLANNING 1. IDP: Completion – May  2. MDP/LUB: Review ‐ June  3. INDUSTRIAL AREA: Zoning – June    HAMLET STRATEGY      TRANSPORTATION & ENVIRONMENT 1. CHURCHILL WATER LINE: Council Direction – Feb.  2.  HAMLET STRATEGY – Sept.  3. SOLID WASTE STRAEGY – Sept.    THREE HILLS EAST WATER: Options    AGRICULTURE & PARKS  1. TOURISM & RECREATION MASTER PLAN: Review –  Apr.  2. HORSESHOE CANYON ENHANCEMENTS – Aug.        CODES: BOLD CAPITALS = NOW Priorities; CAPITALS = NEXT Priorities; Italics = Advocacy; Regular Title Case = Operational Strategies