HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-10 Council MinutesCOUNCIL MEETING AND OPERATIONAL REVIEW WITH M D OF
KNEEHILL EMPLOYEES
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 10th, 1992
The February 7th meeting of Council which adjourned until
9.00 A M , Monday, February 10th, 1992, reconvened at that
time. Council had general discussions and also met with
various employees who wished to discuss any concerns and or
matters with Council
The following were present.
Reeve Richard A Marz
Councillors.
J Finlay Code
Robert E Boake
Harold Mueller
Richard M Vickery
Lawrence Hogg
Division Four
Division One
Division Three
Division Five
Division Six
Division Seven
John C Jeffery, Municipal Administrator
Reeve Marz took charge of the meeting
The following concerns and or comments were expressed by
the various employees
First Employee-
Should only be council present for this review as employees
feel uncomfortable asking staff to leave
Would like gravel trucks ordered with AM /FM radios,
passenger doors with electric window (so it could be easily
opened when dirty i.e at intersections - safety factor)
and Turbo boost gauge
Prefer Goodyear tires to Bridgestones on gravel trucks
T -37 has 609,000 KM and its average
bottom end overhauled at 350,000 km
10 Speed Transmissions preferred in
as 4 wheel differential lockups
Gravel trucks greased at pit in the
at 5000 KM and oil change at 15,000
trucks to the shop to grease when c
speed is 42 KM /h -
gravel trucks as well
summer time - (grease
KM) Feel should bring
Lose to town
New end dump trailers excellent in workmanship and
stability and weight is only 600 pounds more
Production - front line workers - subject to public
scrutinty while shop personnel spends much time sitting
• around and scrutinized by no -one
Would like more information on Local Authorities Pension
Second Employee
With regard to mechanic on the main crew have reviewed work
orders and start up time and total possible hours
Discussed the need for same with Oris and Keith and when
looked at in terms of overhead would like to try a year
without a mechanic to see what the true savings would be
Propose to use Laurie Ross for start up of the equipment,
and use labourer as well for safety
This would put more onus on the operators to look after
their machines
Could utilize mechanic to look at servicing paving crew and
grader operators and gravel crew as well
Preventive Maintenance was discussed - how far should they
go - perhaps shop could work over time to get a machine out
Discussed mechanics supervising other unskilled people
Third Employee-
Talked about on going comunication with Council
With regard to foremen' meeting feel a department
head meeting would be more valuable perhaps 10 to 15
minutes prior to Executive Committee meeting twice a month,
or at least once per month
Put a time limit on each foremen to have his
say at the meeting Very quick executive type meeting
and 3 or 4 foremens meetings a year
Perhaps every two weeks is too many
Request comments and suggestions from Council
Would welcome opportunity to meet with Council when
A S B minutes are approved
Some Councillors feel we do not give A S B enough
consideration
Feel joint meeting of Council would be advantageous
Asked about including an A.S.B. page in with the tax
notices - Advertise farm show?
7
Discussed use of round up on road sides - no postive answer
as yet
Discussed road maintenance priority - feel graders not
out their enough.
Perhaps shifting or work sharing should be looked at
i e replacement for holidays
Feel very strongly should use graders for grading
Asked about use of flex hours
Wants to fine tune his department with what is in
place and not go looking to go off in new directions for
awhile
Hosting the A S B conference November 5th, 1992
Liked the follow up done after last's year operational
review.
Fourth Employee.
Discussed pipeline relocation or lowering and alternate
is a concrete pad over top
Considerable cheaper then relowering or relocating
Pipeline approvals - no fee structures - some areas
charge up to $100 00 per crossing
Building permit fees - if the M D. has no by -law do
not issue permit - Province charges $150 00 to issue a
permit
The M D does not carry through with inspections - perhaps
should consider doing away with the by -law
Perhaps should charge $100.00 for development permits
that are now not required - Just building permit only
M.P.C. should review this suggestion and advise
Possibly charge for rumpus rooms or additions, etc.
Is receiving some complaints about the cost for filing
an appeal with the D A B Fee is $100 00
Safety Code Act - requires quality management plan
Likely should drop building permit by -law
Discussed need for safety officer re- work site safety
Alberta Health and Safety Organization
Discussed road approaches - maybe should be 600 foot
sight distance on local roads and 800 on secondary roads
What about fee for .inspection and approval of approaches -
perhaps $25 00?
Like Council minutes being distributed to all staff
Communication should be looked at re- disaster services
There is a need to co- ordinate equipment and frequencies on
the radio system to make them compatabile
This would be emergency disaster operations headquarters
Discussed RRAP program fee payable for each application
is $775 00 paid by CMHC
Has been asked to do this work for Linden as well
Feel should have someone named as Assistant Development
Officer
Possibly should have management meetings - very short time
required
Mr Boake moved this meeting do now adjourn 4.25 P.M.
Reeve Munici al mi i strator